Skip to main content

DISCOVER/TASC : An Approach to Teaching and Learning That Is Inclusive YetMaximises Opportunities for Differentiation According to Pupils’ Needs

  • Chapter
International Handbook on Giftedness

Abstract

June Maker has been developing DISCOVER (Discovering Strengths and Capabilities while Observing Varied Ethnic Responses); and Belle Wallace has been developing TASC (Thinking Actively in a Social Context). In their latest joint publication (Wallace and Maker, Thinking Skills and Problem-Solving: An Inclusive Approach, London: David Fulton Publishers, 2004), they have combined their work to make a powerful framework for curriculum development that accommodates the varying rates of pupil development. They maintain that although “intelligence” and “giftedness” may have a genetic base, these potentials are essentially developed and driven by the processes that are used in problem-solving; and that all learners are capable of improving their problem-solving processes across the ten human abilities: emotional, social, spiritual, somatic, visual/spatial, auditory, mathematical/symbolic, linguistic, mechanical/technical and scientific. In their joint work, they advocate an inclusive approach to the concept of giftedness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 669.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bandura, M., & Dweck, C. (1985). The relationship of conceptions of intelligence and achievement goals to achievement-related cognition, affect, and behaviour. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceci, S. J. (1996). On intelligence: A bioecological treatise on intellectual development (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covey, S. (2004) The 8th habit: From effectiveness to greatness. London: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • DfEE/QCA (Department for Education and Employment/Qualifications and Curriculum Authority) (1999) The national curriculum: Handbook for primary teachers. London: DfEE and QCA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C., & Leggett, E. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furedi, F. (2001). Paranoid parenting. London: Allen Lane, Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, S. A., Stepien, W. J., & Rosenthal, H. (1992). The effects of problem-based learning on problem-solving. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(4), 195–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1992). Assessment in context: The alternative to standardized testing. In B. Gifford & M. O’Connor (Eds.), Changing assessments: Alternative views of aptitude, achievement, and instruction. (pp. 77–120). Boston, MA: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1995). Reflection on multiple intelligences: Myths and messages. Phi Delta Kappa, 77, 200–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligences reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. NY, Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getzels, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1967). Scientific creativity. Science Journal,3(9), 80–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getzels, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problem finding in art. New York: Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxtable, M. (2006). Making public my embodied knowledge as an educational psychologist in the enquiry, How can (do) I improve my practice as a Senior Educational Psychologist? Presented at BERA conference, Warwick.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, L., & Chard, S. (1990). Engaging children’s minds. New Jersey, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maker, C. J. (1982a). Curriculum development for the gifted. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maker, C. J. (1982b). Teaching models in education of the gifted. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maker, C. J. (1992). Intelligence and creativity in multiple intelligences: Identification and development. Educating Able Learners: Discovering and Nurturing Talent, 27, 12–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maker, C. J. (1993). Creativity, intelligence, and problem-solving: A definition and design for cross-cultural research and measurement related to giftedness. Gifted Education International, 9, 68–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maker, C. J. (1994). Authentic assessment of problem solving and giftedness in secondary school students. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 2(1), 19–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maker, C. J. (1996). Identification of gifted minority students: A national problem, needed changes and a promising solution. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40(1), 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maker, C. J. (2001). DISCOVER: Assessing and developing problem solving. Gifted Education International, 15(3), 232–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maker, C. J. (2004). Creativity and multiple intelligences: The DISCOVER project and research. In S. Lau, N. N. Hui, & Y. C. Ng (Eds.) Creativity: When East Meets West. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maker, C. J. (2005a). The DISCOVER Project: Improving assessment and curriculum for diverse gifted learners. Senior Scholars Series Monograph. Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maker, C. J. (2005b). Integrating the concepts of creativity, intelligence, and problem solving: The DISCOVER project research and new directions. Psychology: The Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2(4) (Special Issue on Creativity), 102–112. [Published in the journal in Russian and available on the website in English]

    Google Scholar 

  • Maker, C. J., & Anuruthwong, U. (2003). The miracle of learning: The prism model. Proceedings of the 15th Biennial World Conference of the World Council for Gifted and Talented Students. Adelaide, Australia: World Council for Gifted and Talented Students.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maker, C. J., & King, M. A. (1996). Nurturing giftedness in young children. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maker, C. J., Muammar, O., Serino, L., Kuang, C. C., Mohamed, A., & Sak, U. (2006). The DISCOVER curriculum model: Nurturing and enhancing creativity in all children. Korean Educational Development Institute (KEDI) Journal of Educational Policy, 3(2), 99–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maker, C. J., & Nielson, A. B. (1995). Teaching/Learning models in education of the gifted (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maker, C. J., & Nielson, A. B. (1996). Curriculum development and teaching strategies for gifted learners (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maker, C. J., Nielson, A. B., & Rogers, J. A. (1994). Giftedness, diversity, and problem-solving: Teaching Exceptional Children, 27, 4–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maker, C. J., & Pease, R. (2008). DISCOVER and TASC in a summer program for gifted students. Gifted Education International, 24(2/3), 323–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maker, C. J., Rogers, J. A., Nielson, A. B., & Bauerle, P. (1996). Multiple Intelligences, problem solving, and diversity in the general classroom. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19(4), 437–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maker, C. J., & Schiever, S. W. (2005). Teaching/Learning models in education of the gifted (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maker, C. J., & Zimmerman, R. H. (2008). Problem solving in a complex world: Intergrating DISCOVER, TASC, and PBL in a teacher education project. Education International, 24(2/3), 160–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, C., & Dweck, C. (1997). Implicit theories of intelligence: Malleability beliefs, definitions, and judgements of intelligence. Unpublished data, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCC (National Curriculum Council) (1989a). A framework for the primary curriculum. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCC (National Curriculum Council) (1989b). A curriculum for all. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielson, A. B. (1994). Traditional identification: Elitist, racist, sexist? New evidence. CAG Communicator: The Journal of the California Association for the Gifted, 3, 18–19, 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofsted (Office for Standards in Education) (1991). Well-managed classes in primary schools: A case study of six teachers. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofsted (Office for Standards in Education) (1994). Primary matters. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. (1992). Smart schools: From training memories to educating minds’. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sainsbury, M. (1998) Making sense of baseline assessment. London: Hodder and Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sak, U., & Maker, C. J. (2005). Divergence and convergence of mental forces of children in open and closed mathematical problems. International Education Journal, 6(2), 252–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sammons, P., Hillman, J., & Mortimer, P. (1985) Key characteristics of effective schools. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarouphim, K. M. (2000). Internal structure of DISCOVER: A performance-based assessment. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23(3), 314–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarouphim, K. M. (2001). DISCOVER: Concurrent validity, gender differences, and identification of minority students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 45, 130–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarouphim, K. M. (2002). DISCOVER in high school: Identifying gifted Hispanic and Native American students. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 14, 30–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarouphim, K. M. (2004). DISCOVER in middle school: Identifying gifted minority students. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 10, 61–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiever, S. W., & Maker, C. J. (1991). Enrichment and acceleration: An overview and new directions. In G. Davis & N. Colangelo (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 99–110). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiever, S. W., & Maker, C. J. (1997). Enrichment & acceleration: An overview & new directions. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 113–125). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1986). Intelligence applied: Understanding and increasing you intelligence skills. San Diego: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Successful intelligence. New York, NY: Plume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1999). Intelligence as developing expertise. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 259–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taetle, L., & Maker, C. J. (in review) The effects of the DISCOVER problem-solving arts-infused curriculum model on state-mandated standardized test scores. Manuscript submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suschitzsky, W., & Chapman, J. (1998). Valued children: Informed teaching. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, B., & Adams, H. B. (1993). TASC: Thinking actively in a social context. Oxford: AB Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, B., & Adams, H. B. (Eds.) (1993). Worldwide perspectives on the gifted disadvantaged. Oxford: AB Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, B., Maker, C. J., Cave, D. & Chandler, S. (2004) Thinking skills and problem-solving: An inclusive approach. London: David Fulton Publishers (A NACE-Fulton Pub).

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, J. (2006). Living inclusional values in educational standards of practice and judgement, Onatario Action Researcher, Vol. 8.2.1. Retrieved 11 September 2007 from http://www.nipissingu.ca/oar/new_issue-V821E.htm

  • Whitehead, J., & McNiff, J. (2006) Action research living theory. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. (2003) Promoting independent learning in the primary classroom. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Wallace .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wallace, B., Maker, C. (2009). DISCOVER/TASC : An Approach to Teaching and Learning That Is Inclusive YetMaximises Opportunities for Differentiation According to Pupils’ Needs. In: Shavinina, L.V. (eds) International Handbook on Giftedness. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6162-2_57

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics