Skip to main content

The History of Giftedness Research

  • Chapter
International Handbook on Giftedness

Abstract

Perceptions of giftedness have, over the course of history, developed from a theological through a metaphysical to an empirical approach. This chapter will offer an overview of the latter approach, which has guided giftedness research since the end of the 19th century. First, the historical development of the concept of intelligence and its significance for giftedness research will be delineated. This will be followed by a historical review of studies based on multi-dimensional models of giftedness and the expertise approach. Following a rendering of investigations on gene/environment interactions, a historical outline will focus on educational studies and studies on individual differences and subgroups of gifted students. As a conclusion, factors that had an influence on giftedness research over the course of history will be submitted for discussion, also addressing the significance of cultural differences and relevant research in this area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 669.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ackerman, P. L. (1987). Individual differences in skill learning: An integration of psychometric and information processing perspectives Psychological Bulletin, 102, 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, P. L. (1988). Determinants of individual differences during skill acquisition: Cognitive abilities and information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 288–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skills. Psychological Review, 89, 369–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R. (1990). Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Applbaum, M. J. (1961). A special guidance program for gifted underachievers of the tenth grade. The Bulletin, 45, 20–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbe, W. B. (1955). Evaluation of special classes for gifted children. Exceptional Children, 22, 60–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1905). Sur la nécessité d’établir un diagnostic scientifique des états inférieurs de l’intelligence [Upon the necessity of establishing a scientific diagnosis of inferior states of intelligence]. L’Anne Psychologique, 11, 163–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1916). The intelligence of the feeble-minded. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, W. E. (1975). Characteristics of teachers judged successful by intellectually gifted, high achieving high school students. In W. B. Barbe & J. S. Renzulli (Eds.), Psychology and education of the gifted(pp. 449–459). New York: Irvington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1985). Developing talent in young people. New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bongartz, K., Kaisser, U., & Kluge, K. (1985). Die verborgene Kraft: Hochbegabung -Talentierung – Kreativität. [The hidden strength: Giftedness– talent – creativity]. Berichte zur Erziehungstherapie und Eingliederungshilfe, 35, Schriftreihe des EREW Institutes Viesen. München, Germany: Minerva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borland, J. H., & Wright, L. (2000). Identifying and educating poor and underrepresented gifted students. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik. (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 587–594). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brix, E. (1988). Mathematik und Begabung [Mathematics and giftedness]. Hamburg, Germany: Krämer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler-Por, N. (1993). Underachieving gifted students. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International Handbook of Research and Development of Giftedness and Talent (pp. 649–668). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. R. Tirri, K., Rouhotie, P., & Walberg, H. (2004). Cross-cultural research: Basic issues, dilemmas and strategies. Tampere, FL: Hame Polytechnic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities. A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, K. R., & Swanson, H. L. (1990). An analysis of the most frequently cited gifted journal articles since the Marland Report: Implications for research. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34, 116–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattel, J. (1903). A statistical study of eminent men. Popular Science Monthly, 56, 359–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceci, S. J., Ramey, S. L., & Ramey, C. T. (1990). Framing intellectual assessment in terms of a person-process-context model. Educational Psychologist, 25, Special issue: Intelligence and intelligence testing, 269–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). The mind’s eyes in chess. In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 215–281). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colangelo, N., & Davis, G. A. (1997). Handbook of gifted education. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. G., Croft, L. J., Baldus, C. M., & Ihrig, D. (2003). Young inventors. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), The international handbook of innovation (pp. 281–292). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, C. M., (1926).Genetic studies of genius. Vol. II. The early mental traits of the three hundred geniuses. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craven, R. G., Marsh, H. W., & Print, M. (2000). Selective Streamed and Mixed-Ability Programs for Gifted Students: Impact on Self-Concept, Motivation, and Achievement. Australian Journal of Education, 44, 51–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species. London, UK: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Groot, A. (1946). Het denken van den schaker [The thinking of chess players]. Amsterdam, NL: Noord-Hollandsche Uit.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Groot, A. (1978). Thought and choice and chess. The Hague, NL: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeHaan, R. F., & Havighurst, R. J. (1957). Educating the gifted. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dienstbach, W. M. (1925). Zur Förderung der besonders begabten Volksschüler [Fostering extraordinarily gifted students in public schools]. Frankfurt/Main, Germany: Diesterweg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, F. A., Gentry, M. L., Mathews, D. J., McCoach, D. B., & Worrell, F. C. (2005). Size does matter: To what extent and in what manner have researchers in gifted education reported effect sizes during the last decade? Symposium at the 87th Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA) in San Francisco, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, F. A., & Moon, S. M. (Eds.). (2006). The handbook of secondary gifted education. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörner, D. (1986). Diagnostik der operativen Intelligenz [Diagnosis of operative intelligence]. Diagnostica, 32, 290–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drews, E. M. (1957). A four-year study of 150 gifted adolescents. Report presented to the American Psychological Association, December 1957. Printed in Goldberg, M. L. (1958). Recent research on the talented. Teachers College Record, 60, 150–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drews, E. M. (1959). The effectiveness of homogeneous and heterogeneous ability grouping in 9thgrade English classes with slow, average, and superior students Washington: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durr, W. K. (1960). Characteristics of gifted children: Ten years of research. Gifted Child Quarterly, 4, 75–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekstrom, R. B. (1961). Experimental studies of homogeneous grouping: A critical review. School Review, 69, 216–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elo, A. E. (1978). The rating of chess players, past and present. New York: Arco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elwell, C. (1958). Acceleration of the gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 2, 21–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A. (1996). The acquisition of expert performance: An introduction to some of the issues. In. K. A. Ericsson (Ed.), The road to excellence – the acquisition of expert performance in the arts and science, sports and games (pp. 1–50). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A. (1998). The scientific study of expert levels of performance: General implications for optimal learning and creativity: High Ability Studies, 9, 75–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N. F., Feltovich, P. J., & Hoffmann, R. R. (Eds.). (2006). The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge UniversityPress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., & Crutcher, R. J. (1990). The nature of exceptional performance. In P. B. Baltes, D. L. Featherman, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Life-span development and behavior (pp. 187–217). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., & Delaney, P. (1999). Long-term working memory as an alternative to capacity models of working memory in everyday skilled performance. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control(pp. 257–297). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. Th., & Tesch-Roemer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., & Lehmann, A. (1996). Expert and exceptional performance: Evidence of maximal adaptations on task constraints. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 273–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., Roring, R. W., & Nandagopal, K. (2007). Giftedness and evidence for reproducibly superior performance: An account based on the expert-performance framework. High Ability Studies, 18, 3–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., & Staszewski, J. J. (1989). Skilled memory and expertise: Mechanisms of exceptional performance. In D. Klahr & K. Kotovsky (Eds.), Complex information processiong: the impact of Herbert A. Simon (pp. 235–267). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feger, B. (1988). Hochbegabung: Chancen und Probleme [Gifted: Chances and problems]. Bern, Switzerland: Hans Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feger, B. (1991). William Sterns Bedeutung für die Hochbegabtenforschung [William Stern’s role in giftedness research]. In W. Deutsch (Ed.), Über die verborgene Aktualität von William Stern (pp. 93–108). Frankfurt/Main, Germany: Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fels, C. (1999). Identifizierung und Förderung Hochbegabter in den Schulen der Bundesrepublik Deutschland [Identifying and fostering gifted students in Germany]. Stuttgart, Germany: Haupt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitts, P., & Posner, M. I. (1967). Human performance. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, J. R. (1984). The mean IQ of Americans: Massive gains 1932 to 1978. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 29–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, J. R. (1998). IQ gains over time: Toward finding the causes. In U. Neisser (Ed.), The rising curve: Long-term gains in IQ and related measures (pp. 25–66). Washington: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D. Y., Moore, J. L., & Whiting, G. W. (2006). Eliminating deficit orientations: Creating classrooms and curricula for gifted students from diverse cultural backgrounds. In M. G. Constantine, & W. Derald, (Eds.), Addressing racism: Facilitating cultural competence in mental health and educational settings (pp. 173–193). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J., & Urban, K. (1983). Über Probleme des Identifizierens und Etikettierens von hochbegabten Kindern [Problems concerning the identifying and labeling of gifted children]. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 30, 67–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J. (2004). Cultural influences on gifted gender achievement. High Ability Studies, 15, 7–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, J. L. (Ed.). (1959). Educating the gifted. A book of readings. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, F. (1985). Giftedness and talent: Re-examination of the definitions. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29, 103–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, F. (1993). Constructs and models pertaining to exceptional human abilities. In K. A. Heller, F. Mönks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International Handbook of Research and Development of Giftedness and Talent (pp. 69–87). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, F. (2004). Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a developmental theory. High Ability Studies, 15, 119–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, F. (2007). Predictably, an unconvincing second attempt. High Ability Studies, 18, 67–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, J. J. (1988). National agenda for educating gifted students: Statement of priorities. Exceptional Children, 55, 107–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, F. (1869). Hereditary genius: An inquiry into its laws and consequences. New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, F. (1874). English men of science: Their nature and nurture. London, UK: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, F. (1883). Inquiry into human faculty and its development. London, UK: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1985). Frames of mind. The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goertzel, V., & Goertzel, M. G. (1962). Cradles of eminence. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goff, M., & Ackerman, P. (1992). Personality-intelligence relations: Assessment of typical intelligence engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 537–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, M. L. (1959). Recent research on the talented. Teachers College Record, 60, 150–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg M. L., & Passow, A. H. (1962). The effects of ability grouping. Education, 82, 482–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, M. L., Passow, A. H., Camm, D. W., & Neill, R. D. (1966). A comparison of mathematics programs for able junior high school students (Project No. S-0381). Washington: Office of Education, Bureau of Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence. Why it can matter more than IQ. London, UK: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, E. W., & Bridglall, B. L. (2005). Nurturing talent in gifted students of color. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness. (pp. 120–146). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowan, J. C. (1955). The underachieving gifted child – a problem for everyone. Exceptional Children, 21, 247–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowan, J. C. (1957). Dynamics of the underachievement of gifted students. Exceptional Children, 24, 98–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigorenko, E. L., Meier, E., Lipka, J., Mohatt, G., Ynez, E., & Sternberg, R. J. (2004). Academic and practical intelligence: A case study of the Yup’ik in Alaska. Learning and Individual Differences, 14, 183–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinder, R. E. (1985). The gifted in our midst: By their divine deeds, neuroses, and mental test scores we have known them. In F. D. Horowitz & M. O’Brian (Eds.), The gifted and the talented: Developmental perspective (pp. 5–35). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grupp, H., Dominguez-Lacasa, I., & Friedrich-Nishio, M. (2002). Das deutsche Innovationssystem seit der Reichsgründung: Indikatoren einer nationalen Wissenschafts- und Technikgeschichte in unterschiedlichen Regierungs- und Gebietsstrukturen [The German innovation system since the foundation of the empire: Indicators of a national history of knowledge and technology in different governmental structures and domains]. Heidelberg, Germany: Physica-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, T. (1956). Gifted children: The Cleveland story. Cleveland, OH: World Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, J., Harrington, C., & Karns, E. (1991). The Marland report: Twenty years later. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 15, 31–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. (1988). Working memory, comprehension and aging: A review and a new view. In G. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 193–225). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasher, L., Zacks, R., & May, C. (1999). Inhibitory control, circadian arousal, and age. In D. Gopher & A. Koriat (Eds.), Attention and performance XVII (pp. 653–675). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauck, B. B., & Freehill, M. F. (1972). The gifted – case studies. Dubuque, IA: Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, K. A. (1989). Perspectives on the diagnosis of giftedness. German Journal of Psychology, 13, 140–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, K. A. (1990). Goals, methods and first results from the Munich Longitudinal Study of Giftedness in West Germany. In C. W. Taylor (Ed.), Expanding Awareness of Creative Potentials Worldwide (pp. 538–543). New York: Trillium Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, K. A. (Ed.). (1992) Hochbegabung im Kindes- und Jugendalter. [High ability in childhood and adolescence]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, K. A. (1993). Structural tendencies and issues of research on giftedness and talent. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, & H. A. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 49–67). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, K. A., & Hany, E. (1986). Identification, development and achievement analysis of talented and gifted children in West Germany. In K. A. Heller & J. Feldhusen (Eds.), Identifying and nurturing the gifted (pp. 67–82). Toronto, Canada: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, K. A., Mönks, F. J., Sternberg, R. J., & Subotnik, R. F. (Eds.). (2000). International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, K. A., & Schofield N. (2000). In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 123–137). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández de Hahn, E. L. (2000). Cross-cultural studies in gifted education. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik. (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 549–561). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildreth, G. H. (1938). Characteristics of young gifted children. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 53, 287–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildreth, G. H. (1952). Education of gifted children at Hunter College Elementary School. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holahan, C. K., Sears, R. R., & Cronbach, L. J. (1995). The gifted group in later maturity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingworth, L. S. (1914). Variability as related to sex differences in achievement. A critique. The American Journal of Sociology, 19, 510–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingworth, L. S. (1916a). Sex Differences in mental tests. Psychological Bulletin, 13, 377–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingworth, L. S. (1916b). Social devices for impelling women to bare and rear children. The American Journal of Sociology, 22, 19–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingworth, L. S. (1916c). The vocational aptitudes of women. In H. L. Hollingworth (Ed.), Vocational psychology. New York: Appleton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingworth, L. S. (1926). Gifted children. Their nature and nurture. New York. Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, J., & Cattell, R. (1966). Refinement and test of the theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 57, 253–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, M. (1982). Biographical evidence and the development of outstanding individuals. American Psychologist, 37, 1071–1081.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, M. J. A., Davidson, J. E., & Sloboda, J. A. (1998). Innate gifts and talents: Reality or myth? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 399–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle, E., & Wilks, J. (1975). Gifted children and their education. London, UK: Department of Education and Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jäger, A. (1982). Mehrmodale Klassifikation von Intelligenzleistungen. Experimentell kontrollierte Weiterentwicklung eines deskriptiven Intelligenzstrukturmodells [Multimodal classification of intelligence performances: Experimentally controlled development of a descriptive model of intelligence structure]. Diagnostica, 28, 195–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, M. D. (1948). The upper limit of ability among American Negroes. Science, 66, 399–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, A. (1982). The chronometry of intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 1, pp. 255–310). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, J. L. (2005). The women question: An historical overview of the education of gifted girls. In S. K. Johnsen & J. W. Kendrick (Eds.), Teaching and counseling gifted girls (pp. 3–8). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Justman, J. (1953). Personal and social adjustment of intellectually gifted accelerants and non-accelerants in Junior High Schools. School Review, 61, 468–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karnes, M. B., & Johnson, L. J. (1991). Gifted handicapped. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of Gifted Education (pp. 428–437). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khaleefa, O. (1999). Research on creativity, intelligence and giftedness: The case of the Arab world. Gifted and Talented International, 14, 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klausmeier, H. J., & Ripple, R. E. (1962). Effects of accelerating bright older pupils from second to fourth grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 53, 93–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, A. G. (2000). Fitting the school to the child: The mission of Leta Stetter Hollingworth, founder of gifted education. Roeper Review, 23, 97–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krogius, N. V. (1976) Psychology in chess. New York: RHM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. C. (1992). Meta-analytic findings on grouping programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 73–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz, J. J., & Svenson, E. J. (1951). Factors related to over-achievement and underachievment in school. School Review, 59, 472–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyllonen, P., & Christal, R. (1990). Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity? Intelligence, 14, 389–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippa, R., Martin, L., & Friedman, H. (2000). Gender-related individual differences and mortality in the Terman longitudinal study: Is masculinity hazardous to your health? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1560–1570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1993). The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioural treatment: Confirmation from meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 48, 1181–1209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombroso, C. (1895). The men of genius. London, UK: Scott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovell, K., & Shields, J. (1967). Some aspects of a study of the gifted child. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 37, 201–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupart, J. L. (1992). The hidden gifted: Current state of knowledge and future research directions. In F. J. Mönks & W. A. M. Peters (Eds.), Talent for the future: Social and personality development of gifted children (pp. 177–190). Assen-Maastricht, NL: Van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maker, C. J. (1975). Training teachers for the gifted and talented: A comparison of models. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maker, C. J. (1996). Identification of gifted minority students: A national problem, needed changes and a promising solution. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 41–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marland, S. P. (1971). Education of the gifted and talented (Vol. 2). Washington: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marland, S. P. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented: Report to the congress of the United States by the U. S. Commissioner of Education. Washington: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinson, R. A. (1960). The California study of programs for gifted pupils. Exceptional Children, 26, 339–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, R., Appelbaum, M. J., & Hogarty, P. (1973). Developmental changes in mental performance. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 38, 1–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mönks, F. J. (1963). Beiträge zur Begabtenforschung im Kindes- und Jugendalter [Contributions to giftedness research in childhood and adolescence]. Archiv für die gesamte Psychologie, 115, 362–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mönks, F. J. (1981). Entwicklungspsychologische Aspekte der Hochbegabtenforschung [Aspects of developmental psychology in giftedness research]. In W. Wieczerkowski & H. Wagner (Eds.), Das hochbegabte Kind (pp. 38–51). Düsseldorf, Germany: Schwann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mönks, F. J., & Katzko, M. W. (2005). Giftedness and gifted education. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness. (2nd ed., pp. 187–200). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, S. M., & Rosselli, H., C. (2000). Developing gifted programs. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 499–521). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, H. H. (1952). A psychometric comparison of achieving and non achieving college students of high ability. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 16, 292–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J. B., & Cleland, D. L. (1971). The role of the teacher of gifted and creative children. In P. A. Witty (Ed.), Reading for the gifted and creative student. Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neubauer, A. (1995). Intelligenz und Geschwindigkeit der Informationsverarbeitung [Intelligence and speed of information processing]. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, J. (1891). The insanity of genius, and the general inequality of human faculty, physiologically considered. London, UK: Ward & Downey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Turner, D. (2002). Gender differences among elementary school-aged gifted students in achievement, perceptions of ability, and subject preference. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 25, 233–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, W. A., & Johnson, W. C. (1949). Some measured personality traits of collegiate underachievers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 40, 41–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passow, A. H. (1993). National/State policies regarding education of the gifted. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 29–48). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passow, A. H., Goldberg, M., Tannenbaum, A. J., & French, W. (1955). Planning for talented youth. Oxford, UK: Bureau of Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passow, A. H., Mönks, F., & Heller, K. A. (1993). Research and education of the gifted in the year 2000 and beyond. In K. A. Heller, F. Mönks, & A. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 883–903). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino, J., & Glaser, R. (1979). Cognitive correlates and components in the analysis of individual differences. Intelligence, 3, 187–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perleth, Ch., Lehwald, G., & Browder, C. S. (1993). Indicators of high ability in young children. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 283–310). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perleth, Ch., Schatz, T., & Mönks, F. J. (2000). Early indicators of high ability. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 297–316). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, W. A. M., Grager-Loidl, H., & Supplee, P. (2000). Underachievement in gifted children and adolescents: Theory and practice. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Moenks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik, (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 609–621). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, P. (1916). Der Aufstieg der Begabten [Rise of the gifted]. Leipzig, Germany: Teubner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillipson, S. N. (2007). A framework for the study of socio-cultural perspectives of giftedness. In S. N. Phillipson & M. McCann (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness: Socio-cultural perspectives (pp. 1–35). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillipson, S. N., & McCann, M. (2007). Conceptions of giftedness: Socio-cultural perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plomin, R. (1994). Nature, nurture, and social development. Social Development, 3, 37–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressey, S. L. (1964). Concerning the nature and nurture of genius. In J. L. French (Ed.), Educating the gifted (pp. 11–23). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Wilson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyryt, M. C. (1988). The gifted child quarterly as database. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Gifted Children in Orlando, FL, November 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyryt M. C. (2005). Quantitative research methods in giftedness research. Symposium at the World Council for Gifted and Talented Children in New Orleans, LA, August 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahn, H. (1985). Talente finden – Talente fördern [Finding talents – Fostering talents]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahn, H. (1986). Jugend forscht [Youth research]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raph, J. B., Goldberg, M. L., & Passow, A. H. (1966). Bright underachievers. New York: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis, S. M. (2003). Gifted girls, twenty-five years later: Hopes realized and new challenges found. Roeper Review, 25, 154–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis, S. M. (2006). Gender, Adolescence, and Giftedness. In Dixon, F. A., & Moon, S. M. (Eds.), The handbook of secondary gifted education (pp. 87–111). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (2003). Developing high potentials for innovation in young people through the school wide enrichment model. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), The international handbook of innovation (pp. 333–346). New York: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 180–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of Giftedness (pp. 53–78). Cambridge, UK: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, J. S. (2003). The Three-Ring Conception of Giftedness: Its implications for understanding the nature of innovation. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of Giftedness (pp. 79–96). Cambridge, UK: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripple, R. E. (1961). A controlled experiment in acceleration from the second to the fourth grade. Gifted Child Quarterly, 5, 119–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, H. B. (1979). Early identification and intervention. In. A. H. Passow (Ed.). The gifted and talented: Their education and development (pp. 138–154). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roe, A. (1952). The making of a scientist. New York: Dodd, Mead.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roe, A. (1953). A psychological study of eminent psychologists and anthropologists and a comparison with biological and physical scientists. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 67, 1–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, K. B. (1989). A content analysis of the literature on giftedness. Journal of the Education of the Gifted, 13, 78–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rost, D. H. (Ed.). (1993). Lebensumweltanalyse hochbegabter Kinder. Das Marburger Hochbegabtenprojekt[Analysis of the environment of gifted children. The Marburg Giftedness Project]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rost, D. H. (2000a). Grundlage, Fragestellungen, Methode [Foundations, research questions and method]. In D. H. Rost (Ed.), Hochbegabte und hochleistende Jugendliche. Neue Ergebnisse aus dem Marburger Hochbegabtenprojekt (pp. 1–91). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rost, D. H. (2000b). Hochbegabte und hochleistende Jugendliche. Neue Ergebnisse aus dem Marburger Hochbegabtenprojekt [Gifted and high achieving adolescents. New results of the Marburg Giftedness Project]. Münster, Germany: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, H. (1957). Pädagogische Psychologie des Lehrens und Lernens [Educational psychology of teaching and learning]. Berlin, Germany: Schroedel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (2005). Creative giftdness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 295–311). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samson, G. E., Grane, M. E., Weinstein, T., & Walberg, H. J. (1984). Academic and occupational performance: A quantitative synthesis. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 311–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sattler, J. (1988). Assessment of children. San Diego, CA: Jerome M. Sattler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarr S., & McCartney, K. (1983). How people make their own environments: A theory of environment effects. Child Development, 54, 424–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W. (1993). Domain-specific knowledge and memory performance in children. Educational Psychology Review, 5, 257–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W. (2000). Lebenslanges Lernen aus der Sicht der (kognitiven) Entwicklungspsychologie [Lifelong learning from the perspective of cognitive developmental psychology]. In W. Lempert (Ed.), Lebenslanges Lernen im Beruf – seine Grundlegung im Kindes- und Jugendalter (pp. 76–89). Opladen, Germany: Leske + Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W., Bullock, M., & Sodian, B. (1998). Die Entwicklung des Denkens und der Intelligenzunterschiede zwischen Kindern [The development of thinking und intelligence differences among children]. In F. Weinert (Ed.), Entwicklung im Kindesalter (pp. 53–75). Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scripp, L., & Subotnik, R. F. (2003). Directions for innovation in music education: Integrating conceptions of musical giftedness into general educational practice and enhancing innovation on the part of musically gifted students. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), The international handbook of innovation (pp. 485–512). New York: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seagoe, M. V. (1975). Terman and the gifted. Los Altos, CA: William Kaufman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears, P. S. (1979). The Terman studies of genius, 1922–1972. In A. H. Passow (Ed.), The gifted and talented: Their education and development (pp. 75–96). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears, R. R. (1977). Sources of life satisfaction of the Terman gifted men. American Psychologist, 32, 119–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears, R. R. (1984). The Terman Gifted Children Study. In S. A. Mednick, M. Harway, & K. M. Finello (Eds.), Handbook of longitudinal research (Vol. 1). New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, B., Palmer, F., Antell, S., Bilker, S., Ross, A., & Capute, A. (1989). Giftedness. Can it be predicted in infancy? Clinical Pediatrics, 28, 205–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavinina, L. V. (2003). The international handbook of innovation. New York: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavinina, L. V. (2006). Micro-social factors in the development of entrepreneurial giftedness: The Case of Richard Branson. High Ability Studies, 17, 225–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, M. C., & McCuen, J. T. (1960). The onset of academic underachievement in bright children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 103–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, L. K. (1989). It all began with Leta Hollingworth: The story of giftedness in women. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 12, 86–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, L. K. (1996). Giftedness and gender in historical context. In K. D. Arnold, K. D. Noble, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), Remarkable women: Perspectives on female talent development (pp. 23–48). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A., & Gilmartin, K. (1973). A simulation of memory for chess positions. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 29–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (2003). Expertise, competence, and creative ability: The perplexing complexities. In. R. J. Sternberg & E. L. Grigorenko (Eds.), The psychology of abilities, competencies, and expertise (pp. 213–238). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (2005). Giftedness and genetics: The emergenic-epigenetic model and its implications. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28, 270–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosniak, L. A. (1985). Learning to be a concert pianist. In B. S. Bloom (Ed.), Developing talent in young people (pp. 19–67). New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solzbacher, C. (2002). Keine Angst vor klugen Kindern. Geschichte und Hintergründe der Diskussion um Hochbegabung in Deutschland [Don’t be afraid of smart children. History and background of the discussion about giftedness in Germany]. In C. Solzbacher & A. Heinbokel (Eds.), Hochbegabte in der Schule – Identifikation und Förderung. Münster, Germany: LIT-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, J. C. (1976). Study of mathematically precocious youth. Gifted Child Quarterly, 20, 246–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, J. C. (1990). A toast October 19, 1989. Roeper Review, 12, 236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, J. C., & Benbow, C. (1986). Youths who reason exceptionally well mathematically. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of Giftedness (pp. 361–387). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, W. (1911). Intelligenzproblem und Schule [Intelligence problem and school]. Leipzig, Germany: Teubner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1977). Intelligence, information processing, and analogical reasoning: A componential analysis of human abilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1984). A contextualist view of the nature of intelligence. International Journal of Psychology, 19, 307–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1988). The nature of creativity. Contemporary psychological perspectives. Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1990). What constitutes a ‘Good’ definition of giftedness? Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14, 96–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1993). Procedures for identifying intellectual potential of the gifted: A perspective on alternative “Metaphors of the Mind”. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 185–208). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1999). Handbook of intelligence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., (2003). Wisdom, intelligence, and creativity, synthesized. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (2004). The international handbook of intelligence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (2007). Why a cultural approach to giftedness? In S. N. Phillipson & M. McCann (Eds.), Conceptions of Giftedness: Socio-cultural perspectives (pp. 15–18). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Berg, C. (1986). Quantitative integration. Definitions of intelligence: A comparison of the 1921 and 1986 symposia. In R. J. Sternberg & D. Detterman (Eds.), What is intelligence? Contemporary viewpoints on its nature and definition (pp. 155–162). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R.J., & Davidson, J. E. (Eds.). (2005). Conceptions of giftedness. (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., Nokes, K., Geissler, P. W., Prince, R., Okatcha, F., Bundy, D. A., et al., (2001). The relationship between academic and practical intelligence: A case study in Kenya. Intelligence, 29, 401–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., Pretz, J. E., & Kaufman, J. C. (2003). In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), The international handbook of innovation (pp. 158–169). New York: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Wagner, R. (1986). Practical intelligence: Nature and origins of competence in the everyday world. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoeger, H. (Ed.). (2004). Gifted females in mathematics, the natural sciences and technology. High Ability Studies, Special Issue, 15, 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoeger, H. (2007). Berufskarrieren begabter Frauen [Career paths of gifted women]. In K. A. Heller & A. Ziegler (Eds.), Begabt sein in Deutschland. (pp. 265–293) Berlin, Germany: Logos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, K. M. (2002). A cross-cultural comparison of the perceived traits of gifted behavior. Gifted and Talented International, 17, 61–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumption, M. R., & Luecking, E. N. (1960). Education of the gifted. New York: Ronald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Süß, H. M. (2003). Intelligenztheorien [Intelligence theories]. In K. D. Kubinger & R. S. Jäger (Eds.), Schlüsselbegriffe der Psychologischen Diagnostik [Key concepts of psychological diagnostics] (pp. 217–223). Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Süß, H. M., Oberauer, K., Wittmann, W., Wilhelm, O., & Schulze, R. (2002). Working-memory capacity explains reasoning ability – and a little bit more.Intelligence, 30, 261–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, A. J. (1986). Giftedness: A psychosocial approach. In R. J. Sterberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of Giftedness (pp. 21–52). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, A. J. (1993). History of Giftedness and “Gifted Education” in World Perspective. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook for research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 3–28). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, A. J. (2000). A history of giftedness in school and society. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 23–53). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, L. C., Clayton, J. D., & Rowley, S. J. (2004). Academic socialization: Understanding parental influences on children’s school related development in the early years. Review of general psychology, 8, 163–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terman L. M., & Miles, C. C. (1936). Sex and personality: Studies in masculinity and femininity. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terman, L. M., & Oden, M. (1947). Genetic studies of genius. Vol IV: The gifted child grows up. Twenty-five years follow-up of a superior group. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terman, L. M., & Oden, M. (1959). Genetic studies of genius. Vol V: The gifted group at mid-life, thirtyfive years follow-up of the superior child. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L. J. (1971). Language disabilities in men of eminence. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 4(1), 34–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L., & Plomin, R. (1993). Genetic influence on cognitive ability. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 103–113). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L., & Plomin, R. (2000). Genetic tools for exploring individual differences in intelligence. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 141–267). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhlinger, C. A., & Stephens, M. A. (1960). Relation of achievement motivation to academic achievement in students of superior ability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 259–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, K. K. (1981). Zur Geschichte der Hochbegabtenforschung [History of giftedness research]. In W. Wieczerkowski & H. Wagner (Eds.), Das hochbegabte Kind (pp. 15–37). Düsseldorf, Germany: Schwann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, K. K.(1982). Vom Genie zu den Hochbegabten [From the genius to the gifted]. In K. K. Urban (Ed.), Hochbegabte Kinder: Psychologische, pädagogische, psychatrische und soziale Aspekte (pp. 17–31). Heidelberg, Germany: Schindele.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, K. K. (2004). Hochbegabung und Störungen der sozialen und emotionalen Entwicklung [Giftedness and disturbances in the social and emotional development]. In B. Gasteiger Klicpera, & H. Julius (Eds.), Förderschwerpunkt soziale und emotionale Entwicklung (pp. 112–134). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, K. K., & Sekowski, A. (1993). Programs and practices for identifying and nurturing giftedness and talent in Europe. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 779–808). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanTassel-Baska, J., Feng, A. X., Quek, C., & Struck, (2004). A study of educators’ and students’ perceptions of academic success for underrepresented populations identified for gifted programs. Psychology Science, 46, Special issue: Identification of gifted students, 363–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, V. L., Feldhusen, J. F., & Asher, J. W. (1991). Meat-analyses and review of research on pull-out programs in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35, 92–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, P. (1987). Speed of information processing and general intelligence. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vialle, W. J. (1993). Current theories in intelligence and the practice of gifted education. Gifted Education International, 77, 11–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, B. D. (1960a). Highly intelligent children Part I: The psychology of the gifted. Educational Research, 2, 101–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, B. D. (1960b). Highly intelligent children Part II: The psychology of the gifted. Educational Research, 2, 207–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, J. D. (2007). The Flynn effect in gifted samples: Status as of 2007. Unpublished manuscript available online at http://www.gifteddevelopment.com/Whats_New/Flynn.htm.

  • Wechsler, D. (1939). The measurement of adult intelligence. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitmore, J. R. (1981). Gifted children with handicapping conditions: A new frontier. Exceptional Children, 48, 106–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willerman, L., & Fiedler, M. (1974). Infant performance and intellectual precocity. Child Development, 45, 483–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, F. T. (1953). Some special ability test scores of gifted children. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 32, 59–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuttke, A. (1900). Der deutsche Volksaberglaube der Gegenwart. [The German superstition of the present] Berlin, Germany: Wiegandt & Grieben.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yewchuk, C. & Lupart, J. (1993). Gifted handicappes: A desultory duality. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 709–725). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoder, G. (1894). A study of the boyhood of great men. Pedagogical Seminary, 3, 134–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahng, L. F., & Sternberg, R. J. (1998). The pentagonal implicit theory of giftedness revisited: A cross-validation in Hon Kong. Roeper Review, 22, 149–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zettel, J. J. (1979). Gifted and talented education over a half-decade of change. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 3, 14–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, A. (2005). The Actiotope model of giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness. (pp. 411–436). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, A., & Heller, K. A. (2000). Conceptions of giftedness from a meta-theoretical perspective. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 3–21). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, A., & Perleth, C. (1997). Schafft es Sisyphos, den Stein den Berg hinaufzurollen? Eine kritische Bestandsaufnahme der Diagnose- und Fördermöglichkeiten von Begabten in der beruflichen Erstaus- und Weiterbildung vor dem Hintergrund des Münchner Begabungsmodells [Will Sisyphos be able to roll the stone up the mountain? A critical examination of the status of diagnosis and fostering opportunities of the gifted in occupational training set against the Munich Talent Model]. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 44, 152–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, A., & Raul T. D. (2000). A review of empirical studies on giftedness. High Ability Studies, 10, 113–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, A., & Stoeger, H. (2007). The Germanic view of giftedness. In N. S. Phillipson & M. McCann (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness: Socio-cultural perspectives (65–98). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heidrun Stoeger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stoeger, H. (2009). The History of Giftedness Research. In: Shavinina, L.V. (eds) International Handbook on Giftedness. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6162-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics