This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Chang, N., Gildea, D.and Narayanan, S.: 1998, ‘A dynamic model of aspectual composition.’ In Proc. CogSci 98.
Davidson, D.: 1967, ‘The logical form of action sentences.’ In N. Rescher, ed., The Logic of Decision and Action, pages 81–95. University of Pittsburgh Press.
Dowty, D.: 1979, ‘Word Meaning and Montague Grammar’. Reidel.
Fernando, T.: 2002, ‘A finite-state approach to event semantics.’ In Proc. of the 9th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME-2002), pages 124–131. IEEE CS Press. Section 2 of this chapter is elaborated in http://www.cs.tcd.ie/Tim.Fernando/jlc.pdf.
Jackendoff, R.: 1991, ‘Parts and boundaries.’ In B. Levin and S. Pinker, eds., Lexical and Conceptual Semantics, pages 9–45. Blackwell.
Krifka, M.: 1989. ‘Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics.’ In R. Bartsch, J. van Benthem, and P. van Emde Boas, eds., Semantics and Contextual Expressions, pages 75–115. Foris.
Moens, M. and Steedman, M.: 1988, ‘Temporal ontology and temporal reference.’ Computational Linguistics, 14(2):15–28.
Muskens, R.: 2001, ‘Talking about trees and truth-conditions.’ Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 10(4):417–455.
Naumann, R.: 2001, ‘Aspects of changes: a dynamic event semantics.’ J. Semantics, 18:.27–81.
Parsons, T.: 1990, ‘Events in the Semantics of English: A Study in Subatomic Semantics. MIT Press.
Pinker, S.: 1989, ‘Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure’. MIT Press.
Pustejovsky, J.: 1991, ‘The generative lexicon.’ Computational Linguistics, 17(4): 409–441.
Ramsay, A.: 1994, ‘The co-operative lexicon.’ In H. Bunt, R. Muskens, and G. Rentier, eds., Proc. International Workshop on Computational Semantics, pages 171–180. ITK, Tilburg.
Ramsay, A.: 1999, ‘Dynamic and underspecified interpretation without dynamic or underspecified logic.’ In H. Bunt and R. Muskens, eds., Computing Meaning, pages 57–72. Kluwer.
Steedman, M.: 2000, ‘The Productions of Time’. Draft, ftp://ftp.cogsci. ed.ac.uk/pub/steedman/temporality/temporality.ps.gz.
Tenny, C. and Pustejovsky, J.: 2000, ‘A history of events in linguistic theory.’ In C. Tenny and J. Pustejovsky, eds., Events as Grammatical Objects, pages 3–37. CSLI, Stanford.
Ter Meulen A.: 1990, ‘English aspectual verbs as generalized quantifiers.’ In J. Carter et al., eds., Proc. NELS 20. GLSA, Department of Linguistics, University of Massachusetts, 378–390.
Tojo, S.: 1999, ‘Event, state and process in arrow logic.’ Minds and Machines, 9:81–103.
Vendler, Z.: 1967, ‘Linguistics in Philosophy’. Cornell University Press.
Verkuyl, H.: 2000, ‘Events as dividuals.’ In J. Higginbotham, F. Pianesi, and A.C. Varzi, eds., Speaking of Events, pages 169–205. Oxford University Press.
Westerståahl, D.: 1989, ‘Quantifiers in formal and natural languages.’ In D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner, eds., Handbook of Philosophical Logic, volume IV, pages 173–209. Reidel.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fernando, T. (2008). Finite-State Descriptions For Temporal Semantics. In: Bunt, H., Muskens, R. (eds) Computing Meaning. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 83. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5958-2_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5958-2_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5957-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5958-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)