Abstract
If mathematics and power are interrelated in a globalised world, what does that mean for a mathematical literacy to be either functional or critical? The discussion of this question is organised in three steps:
First, different processes of globalisation are outlined. The thesis of indifference – that mathematics is a pure science without any socio-political or technological significance – is contrasted with the thesis of significance – that mathematics in action can operate in powerful ways, and power can be exercised though mathematics in action
Second, the processes of constructing, operating, consuming and marginalising are analysed. Here mathematics is operating, and mathematical literacy might be either functional or critical: (1) Processes of construction include advanced systems of knowledge and techniques, by means of which technology, in the broadest interpretation of the term, is maintained and further developed. (2) Processes of operation refer to work practices and job functions where mathematics may operate, although without surfacing in the situation. (3) Processes of consuming refer to situations in which one is addressed as a receiver of goods, information, services, obligations, etc. (4) Processes of marginalising turn out to be an aspect of globalisation, governed by a neo-liberal economy, which is far from being inclusive
Third, as conclusion, I get to the aporia, which questions the very distinction: functional-critical. On the one hand, I find this distinction important with respect to mathematical literacy. On the other hand, the distinction is vague, maybe illusive. Being both important and vague-illusive indicates the aporia we have to deal with, with respect to any critical mathematics education
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alrø, H., & Skovsmose, O. (2002). Dialogue and learning in mathematics education: Intention, reflection, critique. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Archibugi, D., & Lundvall, B. -Å. (Eds.) (2001). The globalizing learning economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Apple, M. (1992). Do the standards go far enough? Power, policy and practice in mathematics Education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23, 412–431.
Bauman, Z. (1998). Globalization: The human consequences. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bauman, Z. (2001). Community: Seeking safety in an insecure world. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: SAGE Publications.
Beck, U. (1999): World risk society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Beck, U. (2000). What is globalization? Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bell, D. (1980). The social framework of the information society. In T. Forrester (Ed.), The microelectronics revolution (pp. 500–549). Oxford: Blackwell.
Castells, M. (1996). The information age: Economy, society and culture. volume I: The rise of the network society. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Castells, M. (1997). The information age: Economy, society and culture. volume II, The power of identity. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Castells, M. (1998). The information age: Economy, society and culture. volume III, End of millennium. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
FitzSimons, G. E. (2002). What counts as mathematics? Technologies of power in adult and vocational education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books. (First French edition 1975.)
Foucault, M. (1989). The archeology of knowledge. London: Routledge. (First French edition 1969.)
Foucault, M. (1994). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. New York: Vintage Books. (First French edition 1966.)
Frankenstein, M. (1989). Relearning mathematics: A different third R – Radical Maths. London: Free Association Books.
Frankenstein, M. (1998). Reading the world with maths: Goals for a critical mathematical literacy curriculum. In P. Gates (Ed.), Proceedings of the first international mathematics education and society conference (pp. 180–189). Nottingham: Centre for the study of Mathematics Education, Nottingham University.
Gutstein, E. (2003). Teaching and learning mathematics for social Justice in an urban, latino school. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(1), 37–73.
Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2004). Multitude. New York: The Penguin Press.
Hardy, G. H. (1967). A mathematician’s apology. With a Foreword by C. P. Snow. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (1st edition 1940.)
Ihde, D. (1993). Philosophy of technology: An introduction. New York: Paragon House Publishers.
Jablonka, E. (2003). Mathematical literacy. In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 75–102). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Mehrtens, H. (1993). The social system of mathematics and national socialism: A survey. In S. Restivo, J. P. van Bendegem & R. Fisher, R. (Eds.), Math worlds: Philosophical and social studies of mathematics and mathematics education (pp. 219–246). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-Thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Powell, A. (2002): Ethnomathematics and the challenges of racism in mathematics education. In P. Valero & O. Skovsmose (Eds.), Proceedings of the third international mathematics education and society conference (pp. 15–28). Copenhagen, Roskilde and Aalborg: Centre for Research in Learning Mathematics, Danish University of Education, Roskilde University and Aalborg University.
Skovsmose, O. (1994). Towards a philosophy of critical mathematical education. Dordrect: Kluwer.
Skovsmose, O. (2005a). Foregrounds and politics of learning obstacles. For the Learning of Mathematics, 25(1), 4–10.
Skovsmose, O. (2005b). Travelling through education: Uncertainty, mathematics, responsibility. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Skovsmose, O., & Yasukawa, K. (2004). Formatting power of ‘mathematics in a package’: A challenge for social theorising? Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal. (http://www.ex.ac.uk/∼ PErnest/pome18/contents.htm)
Teknologirådet (1995): Magt og modeller: Om den stigende anvendelse af edb-modeller i de politiske beslutninger. Copenhagen: Teknologirådet.
Tomlinson, M. (2001). New roles for business services in economic growth. In D. Archibugi & B. -Å. Lundvall (Eds.), The globalizing learning economy (pp. 97–107). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vithal, R., Christiansen, I. M., & Skovsmose, O. (1995). Project work in univeristy mathematics education: A danish experience: Aalborg university. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 29(2), 199–223.
Wedege, T. (2002). Numeracy as a basic qualification in semi-skilled jobs. For the Learning of Mathematics, 22(3), 23–28.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Skovsmose, O. (2008). Mathematical Literacy and Globalisation. In: Atweh, B., et al. Internationalisation and Globalisation in Mathematics and Science Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5908-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5908-7_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8790-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5908-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)