Abstract
“Wicked” problems emerge from the cross-disciplinary and multi-objective reality of current environmental challenges. Significant ecological risks and their uncertainty combine with conflicting stakeholder objectives and values to create a need for systematic risk and decision integration methods. Comparative Risk Assessment and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis provide useful methods for integrating these diverse, decision-relevant factors. A typical wicked problem is realized in the combination of risk and decision factors within contaminated sediment challenges, such as those found in New York/New Jersey Harbor. In a larger context, we identify three essential decision ingredients, People, Process and Tools that should be carefully considered before prematurely embarking on a decision path.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Belton, V. and Steward, T. 2002. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis An Integrated Approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Boston USA.
Chapman, P.M., McDonald, B.G., and Lawrence, G.S. 2002. Weight-of-Evidence Issues for Sediment Quality (and Other) Assessments. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 8(7):1489–1515.
Checkland, P. 1999. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. John Wiley & Sons Inc. New York USA.
Clemen, R.T. and Riley, T. 2000. Making Hard Decisions. Duxbury Press. California, USA.
Cura, J.J., Bridges, T.S., McAdrle, M.E. 2004. Comparative risk assessment methods and their applicability to dredged material management decision-making. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 10:485–503.
Conklin, J. 2004. Wicked Problems and Social Complexity. http://cognexus.org/wpf/wickedproblems. pdf (last accessed 3/1/2005)
Daniels, S.E. and Walker, G.B. 2001. Working Through Environmental Conflict: the Collaborative Learning Approach. Praeger Publishers. Westport USA.
Figueira, J., Greco, S., and Ehrgott, M. 2005. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. Springer New York.
Gunderson, L.H. and Holling, C.S. 2002. Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press. Washington. USA.
Gunderson, L.H., Holling, C.S. and Light, S.L. 1995. Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions. Columbia University Press. New York. USA.
Hammond, J.S., Keeney, R.L. and Raiffa, H. 1999. Smart Choices: a practical guide to making better life decisions. Broadway Books. New York. USA.
Keeney, R.L and Raiffa, H. 1976. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoff. John Wiley & Sons. New York. USA.
Kane Driscoll, S.B., W.T. Wickwire, J.J. Cura, D.J. Vorhees, C.L. Butler, D.W. Moore, T.S. Bridges. 2002. A comparative screening-level ecological and human health risk assessment for dredged material management alternatives in New York/New Jersey Harbor. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 8: 603–626.
Kangas, J., Kangas, A., Leskinen, P., Pykalainen, J., 2001, MCDM Methods in strategic planning of forestry on state-owned lands in Finland: Applications and Experiences. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 10:257–271.
Kiker, G.A., Bridges T.S., Linkov, I., Varghese, A., and Seager, T. (2005). Application of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in Environmental Decision-Making. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 1(2):1–14.
Larichev, O.I., and Olson, D.L. (2001). Multiple Criteria Analysis in Strategic Siting Problems. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Boston. USA.
Menzie, C., Hope Henning, M., Cura, J., Finkelstein, K., Gentile, J., Maughan, J., Mitchell, D., Petron, S., Potocki, B., Svirsky, S., and Tyler, P. 1996. Special Report of the Massachusetts Weight-of-Evidence Workgroup: A Weight-of-Evidence Approach for Evaluating Ecological Risks. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 2(2):277–304.
National Research Council, 1996. Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. National Academy of Science, Washington, DC).
National Academy of Sciences (NAS), 2004. Adaptive Management for Water Resources Planning. National Academy of Science, Washington, DC).
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) (2004). DLTR Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Manual. Available at http://www.odpm.gov.uk/stellent/groups/odpm_about/documents/page/-odpm_about_608524-02.hcsp. Downloaded March 3, 2005.
Rittel, H. and M. Webber. 1973. Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences. Vol.4: 155–169.
Seager, T.P. 2004. Understanding industrial ecology and the multiple dimensions of sustainability. In Strategic Environmental Management by O’Brien and Gere Engineers. John Wiley & Sons: New York USA.
Suter, G. 1993. Ecological Risk Assessment. CRC Press. Boca Raton. USA.
USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) 1997. Guiding Principles for Monte Carlo Analysis. EPA-630-R-91-001. Risk Assessment Forum. Washington DC, USA.
Vorhees, D.J., Kane Driscoll, S.B., von Stackelberg, K., Cura, J.J. and Bridges, T.S. 2002. An Evaluation of Sources of Uncertainty in a Dredged Material Assessment. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 8(2): 369–389.
Wakeman, T.H. and Themelis, N.J. 2001. A basin-wide approach to dredged material in New York/New Jersey Harbor. Journal of Hazardous Materials 85:1–13.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kiker, G.A., Linkov, I., Bridges, T.S. (2007). Integrating Comparative Risk Assessment and Multicriteria Decision Analysis. In: Linkov, I., Kiker, G.A., Wenning, R.J. (eds) Environmental Security in Harbors and Coastal Areas. NATO Security through Science Series. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5802-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5802-8_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5800-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5802-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)