Abstract
This paper defends and refines the claim that procreation can be wrongful. Procreation is wrongful first when the “nonexistence condition” is met: the person’s life will be filled with suffering that cannot be ameliorated or empty of all the things that make life worth living. Recognizing that this condition is rarely met, the paper then argues that it is wrong to create a person in less extreme circumstances: when the person is likely not to have a minimally decent life, one in which certain important interests cannot be satisfied. Although we must be very cautious about concluding that any particular impairment precludes a minimally decent life, there will be circumstances in which a future life is unlikely to hold a reasonable promise of containing the things that make human lives good. In these circumstances, and if reproduction is avoidable, we are required to forego reproduction altogether.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Press release on single embryo transfer. 2 Aug. 2005. <http://www.asrm.org/media/press/single_embryo.html>.
Archard, D. 2004. Wrongful life. Philosophy 79: 403–20.
Benatar, D. 2006. Better never to have been: The harm of coming into existence. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bettelheim, B. 1987. A good enough parent. New York: Alfred A Knopf, Inc.
Brock, D. W. 1995. The non-identity problem and genetic harms: The case of wrongful handicaps. Bioethics 9(3/4): 269–275.
Buchanan, A., D. Brock, N. Daniels, and D. Wikler, 2000. From chance to choice: Genetics and justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Article 9. 28 July 2005 <http://www.europarl.eu.int/comparl/libe/elsj/charter/art09/default_en.htm>.
Cohen, C. B. 1997. The morality of knowingly conceiving children with serious conditions: An expanded “wrongful” life standard. In Contingent future persons, eds. N. Fotion and J. C. Heller. New York: Kluwer Academic.
Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. 2006. Ethics committee report: Access to fertility treatment by gays, lesbians, and unmarried persons. Fertility and Sterility 86(5): 1333–1335.
Feinberg, J. 1987. Wrongful life and the counterfactual element of harming. Social Philosophy & Policy 4: 164.
The gift of life. 1991. Time Magazine. <http://www.time.com/time/covers/0,16641,19910617,00.html>.
Glover, J. 1992. Future people, disability, and screening. In Justice between age groups and generations, eds. P. Laslett and J. Fishkin, 127–43. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Goldberg, C. 2005. Experts debate age limits for childbearing; committee grapples with needs of kids vs. those of parents. Chicago Tribune 8 Apr. 2005: 14.
Harris, J. 1992. The wrong of wrongful life. In Wonderwoman and superman: The ethics of human biotechnology, ed. J. Harris, 91. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harris, J. 2007. Enhancing evolution: The ethical case for making better people. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Heyd, D. 1992. Genethics: Moral issues in the creation of people. California: University of California Press.
Human Fertilization & Embryology Authority, Chair’s letter CH(04)01a. 2 August 2005 <http://hfea.gov.uk/hfeaguidance/chairslettersarchive/2003–2004/ch0401a>.
Kamm, F. 1992. Creation and abortion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Liao, M. 2006. The right of children to be loved. The Journal of Political Philosophy 14(4): 420–40.
Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital at Stanford. Very low birthweight. 1 August 2005 <http://www.lpch.org/diseasehealthinfo/healthlibrary/hrnewborn/vlbw.html>.
McMahan, J. 2001. Wrongful life: Paradoxes in the morality of causing people to exist. In Bioethics, ed. J. Harris. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Morgan, D., and R. G. Lee. 1991. Blackstone’s guide to the Human Fertilization & Embryology Act 1990.
Parfit, D. 1976. On doing the best for our children. In Ethics and population, ed. M. Bayles. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Company.
Parfit, D. 1986. Reasons and persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Peters, P. G. 1989. Protecting the unconceived: Nonexistence, avoidability, and reproductive technology. Arizona Law Review 31: 487–548.
Peters, P. G. 1992. Rethinking wrongful life: Bridging the boundary between tort and family law. Tulane Law Review 67(2): 397–454.
Peters, P. G. 2004. How safe is safe enough? Obligations to the children of reproductive technology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Peters, P. G. 2009. Implications of the nonidentity problem for state regulation of reproductive liberty. In this collection.
The Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. 2004. Guidelines on the number of embryos transferred. Fertility and Sterility 82: 773–4.
Roberts, M. 1998. Child versus childmaker: Future persons and present duties in ethics and the law. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
Robertson, J. A. 1974–1975. Involuntary euthanasia of defective newborns: A legal analysis. Stanford Law Review 27: 254.
Robertson, J. A. 1994. Children of choice: Freedom and the new reproductive technologies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Steinbock, B. 1986. The logical case for “wrongful life.” Hastings Center Report 16(2): 15–20.
Steinbock, B. 1992. Life before birth: The moral and legal status of embryos and fetuses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Steinbock, B. 1998. Rethinking the right to reproduce. Working Paper Series Number 98.05 Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies: 13–14.
Steinbock, B. 1999. Why most abortions are not wrong. In Bioethics for medical education, Advances in bioethics; v. 5, eds. R. B. Edwards and E. Bittar, 245–267. Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
Steinbock, B. 2000. Disability, prenatal testing, and selective abortion. In Prenatal testing and disability rights, eds. E. Parens and A. Asch, 108–23. Washington, D.C: Georgetown University Press.
Steinbock, B. 2008. Using preimplantation genetic diagnosis to save a sibling: The story of Molly and Adam Nash. In Ethical issues in modern medicine: Contemporary readings in bioethics, eds. B. Steinbock, A. J. London and J. D. Arras. 8th ed. New York: McGraw Hill.
Steinbock, B. and R. McClamrock. 1994. When is birth unfair to the child? Hastings Center Report 24(6): 15–21.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights: 1948–1998. 28 July 2005 <http://www.un.org/overview/ rights.html>.
Woodward, J. 1986. The non-identity problem. Ethics 96: 804–831.
Other References
National Bioethics Advisory Commission. 1997. Cloning human beings: Report and recommendations v. 1, 2. Washington, D.C.
The President’s Council on Bioethics. 2005. Alternative sources of human pluripotent stem cells: A white paper, 57. Washington, D.C.
The President’s Commission on Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. 1982. Deciding to forego life- sustaining treatment: A report on the ethical and legal issues in treatment decisions. Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Steinbock, B. (2009). Wrongful Life and Procreative Decisions. In: Roberts, M.A., Wasserman, D.T. (eds) Harming Future Persons. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 35. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5697-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5697-0_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5696-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5697-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)