Skip to main content

Adult Numeracy for Work and Life: Curriculum and Teaching Implications of Recent Research

  • Chapter
International Handbook of Education for the Changing World of Work

In recent years there have been calls from business and political leaders of diverse countries for them to become ‘knowledge economies’, to make the most of their human capital. One significant area to emerge is research into adult numeracy practices, for citizenship rights and responsibilities and personal development, as well as in restructuring workplaces. However, there continue to be many and often contested definitions of adult numeracy, according to the various interests and perspectives adopted. Definitions in the technical and vocational education and training (TVET) fields are likely to be closely related to intended outcomes and, after an opening discussion of definitions, this chapter continues with a brief review of research into workplace numeracy which has informed conceptualizations of adult numeracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bernstein, B. 2000. Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: theory, research, critique, rev. ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, A.J. 1988. Mathematical enculturation: a cultural perspective on mathematics education. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, A. et al. No date. International comparisons of adult literacy. <www.ioe.ac.uk/hgpersonal/international-comparisons-of-adult_literacy.pdf>

  • Brown, M. et al. 1998. Is the national numeracy strategy research based? British journal of educational studies, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 362–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coben, D. 2000. Mathematics or common sense? Researching ‘invisible’ mathematics through adults’ mathematics life histories. In: Coben, D.; O’Donoghue, J.; FitzSimons, G.E., eds. Perspectives on adults learning mathematics: research and practice, pp. 53–66. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coben, D. 2002. Use value and exchange value in discursive domains of adult numeracy education. Literacy and numeracy studies, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 25–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coben, D. 2006. The social-cultural approach to adult numeracy: issues for policy and practice. In: Tett, L.; Hamilton, M.; Hillier, Y., eds. Adult literacy, numeracy and language: policy, practice and research. Columbus, OH: Open Universities Press/McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coben, D. et al. 2003. Adult numeracy: review of research and related literature. London: National Research and Development Centre for Adult Literacy and Numeracy. <www.nrdc.org.uk>

  • Engeström, Y. 1987. Learning by expanding: an activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit. <lchc. ucsd. edu/MCA/Paper/Engeström/expanding/toc. htm>

  • FitzSimons, G.E. 2000. Lifelong learning: practice and possibility in the pharmaceutical manufacturing industry. Education & training, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 170–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FitzSimons, G.E. 2002. What counts as mathematics? Technologies of power in adult and vocational education. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal, I. et al. 2005. Adult numeracy and its assessment in the ALL survey: a conceptual framework and pilot results. In: Murray, T.S.; Clermont, Y.; Binkley, M., eds. Measuring adult literacy and life skills: new frameworks for assessment, pp. 137–91. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. 1991. Looking for the maths in work. In: Harris, M., ed. Schools, mathematics and work, pp. 132–44. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyles, C. et al. 2002. Mathematical skills in the workplace. Final report to the Science, Technology and Mathematics Council. Foreword and executive summary. London: University of London Institute of Education/Science, Technology and Mathematics Council. <www.basic-skills.co.uk/>

  • International Association for Statistical Education—IASE. 2003. History of the ISLP and the World Numeracy Project. Auckland, New Zealand: IASE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanes, C. 2003. Developing numeracy. In: Stevenson, J., ed. Developing vocational expertise: principles and issues in vocational education, pp. 81–109. Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent, P. et al. 2004. Techno-mathematical literacies in workplace activity. (Paper presented at the International Seminar on ‘Learning and Technology at Work’, Institute of Education, University of London, March 2004.) <www.ioe.ac.uk/tlrp/technomaths>

  • Knijnik, G. 1996. Intellectuals and social movements: examining power relations. In: Kjærgård, T.; Kvamme, A.; Lindén, N., eds. Numeracy, race, gender, and class: proceedings of the third International Conference on the Political Dimensions of Mathematics Education (PDME-III), pp. 90–113. Landås, Norway: Caspar Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuutti, K. 1996. Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In: Nardi, B.A., ed. Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction, pp. 17–44. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenskov, L.; Wedege, T. 2001. Numeracy as an analytical tool in adult education and research. Roskilde, Denmark: Roskilde University. (Centre for Research in Learning Mathematics, publication no. 31.) <www.statvoks.no/emma/>

  • Ma, L. 1999. Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magajna, Z.; Monaghan, J. 2003. Advanced mathematical thinking in a technological workplace. Educational studies in mathematics, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 101–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, K. 2000. How can numeracy contribute to development? A case study of the REFLECT approach to adult education. London: University of London, London School of Economics. [Unpublished M.Sc. dissertation.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Office for Standards in Education. 2003. Literacy, numeracy and English for speakers of other languages: a survey of current practice in post-16 and adult provision. London: OfSTED/ALI. (HMI 1367.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; Statistics Canada. 2000. Literacy in the information age: final report of the International Adult Literacy Survey. Paris: OECD; Ottawa: Statistics Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, A.B.; Frankenstein, M., eds. 1997. Ethnomathematics: challenging Eurocentrism in mathematics education. Albany, NY: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. 2004. Making mathematics count: the report of Professor Adrian Smith’s Inquiry into Post-14 Mathematics Education. London: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steen, L.A. 2001. Epilogue: embracing numeracy. In: Steen, L.A., ed. Mathematics and democracy: the case for quantitative literacy, pp. 107–16. Washington, DC: National Council on Education and the Disciplines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, M. 2004. 14–19 Curriculum and qualifications reform: final report of the Working Group on 14–19 Reform. Annesley, UK: Department for Education and Skills. (The Tomlinson Report.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Trouche, L. 2004. Managing the complexity of human/machine interactions in computerized learning environments: guiding students’ command process through instrumental orchestrations. International journal of computers for mathematics learning, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 281–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Kingdom. Department for Education and Employment. 1999. A fresh start: improving literacy and numeracy. The report of the Working Group chaired by Sir Claus Moser. London: DfEE. (The Moser Report.)

    Google Scholar 

  • United Kingdom. Department for Education and Skills. 2003a. Skills for Life: the national strategy for improving adult literacy and numeracy skills. Focus on delivery to 2007. London: DfES.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Kingdom. Department for Education and Skills. 2003b. The Skills for Life Survey: a national needs and impact survey of literacy, numeracy and ICT skills. London: DfES.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. 1997. International Standard Classification of Education: ISCED. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wake, G.; Williams, J. 2001. Using college mathematics in understanding workplace practice: summative report of research project funded by the Leverhulme Trust. Manchester, UK: University of Manchester. <www.education.man.ac.uk/lta/publications/index.shtml>

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

FitzSimons, G., Coben, D. (2009). Adult Numeracy for Work and Life: Curriculum and Teaching Implications of Recent Research. In: Maclean, R., Wilson, D. (eds) International Handbook of Education for the Changing World of Work. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5281-1_179

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics