Skip to main content

Effects of landscape elements on the distribution of the rare bumblebee species Bombus muscorum in an agricultural landscape

  • Chapter
Arthropod Diversity and Conservation

Part of the book series: Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation ((TOBC,volume 1))

Abstract

The regional distribution pattern of Bombus muscorum was studied in an agricultural landscape of central Germany, one of two remaining areas with the occurrence of this nationally endangered species in the Land Hesse. To determine the landscape characteristics that facilitate the occurrence of B. muscorum, grid-based observation records were analysed in a GIS environment at a regional scale. A significantly negative effect of the number of trees on the occurrence of B. muscorum and a significantly positive one of the proportion of arable land, strongly support the species’ preference for open landscapes. Yet, apart from open landscapes additional landscape features were shown to be important. A significantly positive effect of ditches in the final model revealed the importance of this landscape element for the occurrence of B. muscorum. This finding was additionally supported by recordings of nest-searching queens, nests, and flower visits along dithes. The positive effects of clover and fallow land indicate the species’ need for suitable food resources throughout the season. Because B. muscorum exhibits small foraging ranges, it is essential that landscape elements that provide nesting sites, foraging habitats and undisturbed hibernation structures are next to each other. The low numbers of individuals of B. muscorum recorded indicate that the supply of these habitat elements may have reached a critical threshold in the study region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Backman J.P.C. and Tiainen J. 2002. Habitat quality of field margins in a Finnish farmland area for bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Bombus and Psithyrus). Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 89: 53–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya M., Primack R.B. and Gerwein J. 2003. Are roads and railroads barriers to bumblebee movement in a temperate suburban conservation area? Biol. Conserv. 109: 37–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchmann S.L. and Nabhan G.P. 1996. The Forgotten Pollinators. Island Press/Shearwater Books, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvell C. 2002. Habitat use and conservation of bumblebees (Bombus spp.) under different grassland management regimes. Biol. Conserv. 103: 33–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croxton P.J., Carvell C., Mountford J.O. and Sparks T.H. 2002. A comparison of green lanes and field margins as bumblebee habitat in an arable landscape. Biol. Conserv. 107: 365–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dylewska M. 1957. The distribution of the species of the genus Bombus Latr. in Poland. Acta Zool. Cracov. 2: 259–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Free J.B. 1993. Insect Pollination of Crops. Academic Press, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frommer U. 2001. Bestandsaufnahme der Bienenfauna im Mittleren Hessen (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Naturwissenschaftliche Veröffentlichungen Darmstadt/Bericht N.F. 24: 129–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulson D. 2003. Bumblebees. Their Behaviour and Ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goverde M., Schweizer K., Baur B. and Erhardt A. 2002. Small-scale habitat fragmentation effects on pollinator behaviour: experimental evidence from the bumblebee Bombus veteranus on calcareous grasslands. Biol. Conserv. 104: 293–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagen E. von 1994. Hummeln: Bestimmen, Ansiedeln, Vermehren, Schützen. Naturbuch Verlag, Augsburg, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauck W.W. and Donner A. 1977. Wald’s test as applied to hypotheses in logit analysis. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 72: 851–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich B. 1979. Bumblebee Economics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hessisches Statistisches Landesamt 2000. Statistisches Handbuch Hessen 1999/2000. Landesamt, Wiesbaden, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jedicke E. (ed.), 1997. Die Roten Listen: Gefährdete Pflanzen, Tiere, Pflanzengesellschaften und Biotope in Bund und Ländern. Ulmer, Stuttgart, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennersten O., Loman J., Møler A.P., Robertson J. and Widén B. 1993. Conservation biology in agricultural habitat islands. In: Hansson L. (ed.), Ecological Principles of Nature Conservation: Applications in Temperate and Boreal Environments. Elsevier Applied Science, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kells A.R. and Goulson D. 2003. Preferred nesting sites of bumblebee queens (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in agroecosystems in the UK. Biol. Conserv. 109: 165–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreyer D., Oed A., Walther-Hellwig K. and Frankl R. 2004. Are forests potential landscape barriers for foraging bumblebees? Landscape scale experiments with Bombus terrestris agg. and Bombus pascuorum (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Biol. Conserv. 116/1: 111–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meeus J.H.A. 1993. The transformation of agricultural landscapes in Western Europe. Sci. Total Environ. 129: 171–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne J.L., Clark S.J., Morris R.J., Williams I.H., Riley J.R., Smith A.D., Reynolds D.R. and Edwards A.S. 1999. A landscape-scale study of bumblebee foraging range and constancy, using harmonic radar. J. Appl. Ecol. 36: 519–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne J.L. and Corbet S.A. 1994. Managing habitats for pollinators in farmland. Aspects Appl. Biol. 40: 207–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole C. (ed.), 1993. Diversity of Native Bees and Agroecosystems. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pekkarinen A. and Teras I. 1993. Zoogeography of Bombus and Psithyrus in Northwestern Europe (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Ann. Zool. Fennici 30: 187–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters G. 1972. Ursachen für den Rückgang der seltenen heimischen Hummelarten (Hym., Bombus et Psithyrus). Entomol. Berichte 85–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plowright C.M.S., Plowright R.C. and Williams P.H. 1997. Replacement of Bombus muscorum by Bombus pascuorum in northern Britain. Can. Entomol. 129: 985–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranta E. and Vepsalainen K. 1981. Why are there so many species — spatio-temporal heterogeneity and Northern bumblebee communities. Oikos 36: 28–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmont P. 1988. Monographie écologique et zoogéographique des bourdons de France et de Belgique (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Bombinae). Facultédes Science Agronomique de l’Ètat, Gembloux, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmont P., Leclercq J., Jacob-Remacle A., Pauly A. and Gaspar C. 1993. The faunistic drift of Apoidea in Belgium. In: Bruneau E. (ed.), Bees for Pollination. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, pp. 65–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinig W.F. 1970. Ökologische Studien an mittel-und südosteuropäischen Hummeln (Bombus Latr., 1802) (Hym., Apidae). Mitteilungen der Münchner Entomologischen Gesellschaft 60: 1–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riemann H. 1987. Bienen, Wespen und Ameisen (Hymenoptera Aculeata) als Besiedler von Böschungen an tiefliegenden Entwässerungsgräben. Abh. Naturwiss. Ver. Bremen 40: 333–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittweger H. 1997. Spätquartäre Sedimente im Amöneburger Becken — Archive der Umweltgeschichte einer mittelhessischen Altsiedellandschaft. In: Hermann F.-R. (ed.), Materialien zur Vor-und Frühgeschichte von Hessen. Selbstverlag des Landesamt für Denkmalpflege, Wiesbaden, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Söderström B., Svensson B., Vessby K. and Glimskär A. 2001. Plants, insects and birds in semi-natural pastures in relation to local habitat and landscape factors. Biodiv. Conserv. 10: 1839–1863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sotherton N.W. and Self M.J. 1999. Changes in plant and arthropod biodiversity on lowland farmland: an overview. In: Aebischer N.J., Evans A.D., Grice P.V. and Vickery J.A. (eds), Ecology and Conservation of Lowland Farmbirds. British Ornithologists’ Union, Tring, pp. 26–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistisches Bundesamt (ed.), 2002. Statistisches Jahrbuch 2002 für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Neuster Verlag, Stuttgart, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffan-Dewenter I., Munzenberg U., Burger C., Thies C. and Tscharntke T. 2002. Scale-dependent effects of landscape context on three pollinator guilds. Ecology 83: 1421–1432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoate C. 1996. The changing face of lowland farming and wildlife, Part 2 1945. Brit. Wildlife 7: 162–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoate C., Boatman N.D., Borralho R.J., Carvalho C.R., de Snoo G.R. and Eden P. 2001. Ecological impacts of arable intensification in Europe. J. Environ. Manage. 63: 337–365.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson B., Lagerlöf J. and Svensson B.G. 2000. Habitat preferences of nest-seeking bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in an agricultural landscape. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 77: 247–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas C.D., Cameron A., Green R.E., Bakkenes M., Beaumont L.J., Collingham Y.C., Erasmus B.F.N., de Siqueira M.F., Grainger A., Hannah L., Hughes L., Huntley B., van Jaarsveld A.S., Midgley G.F., Miles L., Ortega-Huerta, M.A., Peterson A.T., Phillips O.L. and Williams S.E. 2004. Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427: 145–148.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson J.D. 1996. Trapline foraging by bumblebees. 1. Persistence of flight-path geometry. Behav. Ecol. 7: 158–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tischendorf S. 2001. Wildbienen und Wespen (Hymenoptera: Apidae) im Oberrheinischen Auwaldgebiet “Kühkopf-Knoblauchsaue” (Hessen). Hessische Faunistische Briefe 20: 21–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiber R. 1998. Verbreitung und Ökologie der Hummeln (Hymenoptera: Apidae) im Landkreis Freudenstadt (Baden-Württemberg). Mit. bad. Landesver. Naturkunde und Naturschute, N.F. 17: 155–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner R. 1971. Die Veränderung der Hummelfauna Cuxhavens in diesem Jahrhundert. Der Versuch einer Deutung. Entomologische Mitteilungen des Zoologischen Museums Hamburg 4: 207–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walther-Hellwig K. 2001. Untersuchungen zu Sammelflugweiten und Dichteverteilung von Honigbienen. Unveröffentlichte Auftragsarbeit für den Landesverband Hess. Imker e.V., Kirchhain in Zusammenarbeit mit d. Hess. Dienstleistungszentrum f. Landwirtschaft, Gartenbau u, Gartenbau u. Naturschutz (HDLGN), Kirchhain, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walther-Hellwig K. and Frankl R. 2000. Foraging habitats and foraging distances of bumblebees, Bombus spp. (Hym., Apidae), in an agricultural landscape. J. Appl. Entomol. 124: 299–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe M.E. 1994. Pollination worries rise as honey bees decline. Science 256: 1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westrich P. 1990. Die Wildbienen Baden-Württembergs. Ulmer, Stuttgart, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westrich P., Schwenninger H.R., Dathe H.H., Riemann H., Saure C., Voith J. and Weber K. 1998. Rote Liste der Bienen (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Schriftenreihe für Landschaftspflege und Naturschutz 55: 119–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams P.H. 1986. Environmental change and the distributions of British bumble bees (Bombus Latr). Bee World 67: 50–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams P.H. 1989. Why are there so many species of bumble bees at Dungeness. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 101: 31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams I.H., Corbet S.A. and Osborne J.L. 1991. Bee-keeping, wild bees and pollination in the European Community. Bee World 72: 170–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf H. 1985. Veränderungen der Hummelfauna (Hymenoptera: Apidae) bei Frankfurt (Main) und Marburg (Lahn). Hessische Faunistische Briefe 5: 66–69.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

David L. Hawksworth Alan T. Bull

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Diekötter, T., Walther-Hellwig, K., Conradi, M., Suter, M., Frankl, R. (2006). Effects of landscape elements on the distribution of the rare bumblebee species Bombus muscorum in an agricultural landscape. In: Hawksworth, D.L., Bull, A.T. (eds) Arthropod Diversity and Conservation. Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5204-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics