Skip to main content

Terminal Sedation: A Substitute for Euthanasia?

  • Chapter
Terminal Sedation: Euthanasia in Disguise?

Abstract

By ‘terminal sedation’ I denote, in the present chapter, a procedure where through heavy sedation a terminally ill patient is put into a state of coma, where the intention of the doctor is that the patient should stay comatose until he or she is dead. No extraordinary monitoring of the medical state of the patient is undertaken. Normal hydration is ignored. All this means that in some cases where patients are being terminally sedated, death is hastened; if the disease does not kill the patient, some complication in relation to the sedation, or the withdrawal of treatment and hydration, or the combination of these, does.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. The example is presented in, and is followed by, a discussion in several issues of the journal. See also the selective bibliography of the literature since 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gillian M. Craig, ‘On withholding nutrition and hydration in the terminally ill: has palliative medicine gone too far?’, Journal of medical ethics, Vol. 20, 1994: 139–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. R.J. Dunlop, J.E. Ellershaw, M.J. Baines, N. Sykes, and C.M. Saunders, ‘On withholding nutrition and hydration in the terminally ill: has palliative medicine gone too far? A reply’, Journal of Medical Ethics, Vol. 21. 1995: 141–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lawrence J. Schneiderman, ‘Is it morally justifiable not to sedate this patient before ventilator withdrawal’ The Journal of Clinical Ethics Vol 2 1991: 129–130

    Google Scholar 

  5. Many philosophers have attempted to make this kind of distinction, most ingenious among them all, Jonathan Bennett. But in my opinion even Bennett fails. Those who want to check this assessment of mine should read his most recent treatment of the subject, which can be found in his book, The Act Itself (Oxford: Oxford UP, 1995), chapters 4 through 8.

    Google Scholar 

  6. An authoritative statement of the principle of double effect can be found in New Catholic Encyclopedia, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Airedale NHS Trust v. Bland (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  8. ‘The Additive Fallacy’, Ethics, 1988:5–31

    Google Scholar 

  9. American Association for Hospice and Palliative Medicine, Position statement on the end-of-life, Appendix of this volume, p. 128.

    Google Scholar 

  10. ‘Palliative Options of Last Resort’, JAMA, Vol. 278, 1997. In this book reprinted as Chapter 1. p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ibid., p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ibid., pp. 7–8.

    Google Scholar 

  13. ‘Is Sedation Without Hydration or Nourishment in Terminal Care Lawful?’, Medico-Legal Journal, Vol. 62, 1994:200.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  15. At a meeting held at The National Board of Health and Welfare on Oct. 29. 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Håkan Samuelsson and Eva Thornberg, ‘Symptomlindring inte dödshjälp’ (Symptom control is not euthanasia), Göteborgs-Posten. January 1. 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  17. This description it taken from M. O’Connor, D.W. Kissane, and O. Spruyt, ‘Sedation of the terminally ill — a clinical perspective’ Monash Bioethics Review. Vol 18 1999 n 22

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dag Lundberg, Psykologiska och etiska aspekter’ (Psychological and Ethical Aspects), in Matts Halldin and Sten G. Lindahl (eds.), Anestesi (Anaesthesia) (Stockholm: Liber, 1999), p 190. My own translation.

    Google Scholar 

  19. ‘Sedation Before Ventilator Withdrawal: Medical and Ethical Considerations’, The Journal of Clinical Ethics, Vol. 2, 1991:127.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Guidelines on palliative sedation adopted by the Norwegian Medical Association, Appendix of this volume, p. 132–133.

    Google Scholar 

  21. ‘Morphine Drips, Terminal Sedation, and Slow Euthanasia: Definitions and Facts, Not Anecdotes’, Journal of Palliative rare Vnl 1 1996.3d

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tännsjö, T. (2004). Terminal Sedation: A Substitute for Euthanasia?. In: Tännsjö, T. (eds) Terminal Sedation: Euthanasia in Disguise?. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2124-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2124-4_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6594-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2124-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics