Skip to main content

Coase Theorem

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law

Abstract

It is always possible to modify by transactions on the market the initial legal delimitation of rights. And, of course, if such market transactions are costless, such a rearrangement of rights will always take place if it would lead to an increase in the value of production (Coase 1960: 15).

Is this statement profound, trivial, a tautology, false, revolutionary, wicked? Each of these has been claimed. A version was named the ‘Coase theorem’ by Stigler (1966: 113) and the accolade has undoubtedly helped publicize some of Coase’s ideas. Indeed, Coase’s 1960 article in which the approach is most fully developed, ‘The Problem of Social Cost’ (henceforth PSC), appears to have been cited more often between 1981 and 1996 than any other paper written by an economist (statistical tests excepted). Yet the word ‘theorem’ evokes a mathematical style which is alien to Coase’s taste and may have done a disservice in diverting attention from his broader message. It has also lured commentators into crude misrepresentation. As Coase rightly complains, ‘The world of zero transaction costs has often been described as a Coasian world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Aivazian, V.A. and Callen, J.L. 1981. The Coase theorem and the empty core. Journal of Law and Economics 24: 175–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. 1974. Are government bonds net wealth? Journal of Political Economy 82: 1095–1117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W.J. 1972. On taxation and the control of externalities. American Economic Review 62: 7–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierce, A. 1925. The Devil’s Dictionary. New York: A.&C. Boni.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calabresi, G. 1965. The decisions for accidents: an approach to nonfault allocation of costs. Harvard Law Review 78: 713–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, S.N.S. 1973. The fable of the bees: an economic investigation. Journal of Law and Economics 16: 11–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R.H. 1937. The nature of the firm. Economica n.s. 4: 386–405 (reprinted in Coase 1988a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R.H. 1959. The Federal Communications Commission. Journal of Law and Economics 2: 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R.H. 1960. The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics 3: 1–44 (reprinted in Coase 1988a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R.H. 1972. Durability and monopoly. Journal of Law and Economics 15: 143–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R.H. 1974a. The lighthouse in economics. Journal of Law and Economics 17: 357–76 (reprinted in Coase 1988a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R.H. 1974b. The market for goods and the market for ideas. American Economic Review 64: 384–91; (reprinted in Coase 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R.H. 1981. The Coase theorem and the empty core: a comment. Journal of Law and Economics 24: 183–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R.H. 1988a. The Firm, the Market, and the Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R.H. 1988b. The nature of the firm: influence. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 4: 33–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R.H. 1991. The institutional structure of production. Alfred Nobel Memorial Prize Lecture in Economic Sciences 1–12 (reprinted in Coase 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R.H. 1992. The institutional structure of production. American Economic Review 82(4): 713–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R.H. 1993. Law and economics at Chicago. Journal of Law and Economics 36(1): 239–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R.H. 1994. Essays on Economics and Economists. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R.H. 1996. Law and economics and A.W. Brian Simpson. Journal of Legal Studies 25: 102—19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooter, R. 1982. The cost of Coase. Journal of Legal Studies 11: 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Meza, D. and Gould, J.R. 1992. The social efficiency of private decisions to enforce property rights. Journal of Political Economy 100(3): 561–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, H. 1972. When does the rule of liability matter? Journal of Legal Studies 1: 13–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, H. 1996. The core disagreement between Pigou, the profession and Coase in the analysis of the externality question. European Journal of Political Economy 12: 565–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Serpa, A.C. 1993. Pigou and Coase in retrospect. Cambridge Journal of Economics 17: 27–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Serpa, A.C. 1994. Pigou and Coase: a mathematical reconciliation. Journal of Public Economics 54: 267–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgeworth, F.Y. 1881. Mathematical Psychics. London: C. Kegan Paul & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, J. 1987. Information and the Coase theorem. Journal of Economic Perspectives 1: 113–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg, D. and Tirole, J. 1983. Sequential bargaining with incomplete information. Review of Economic Studies 50: 221–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, S. and Hart, O. 1986. The costs and benefits of ownership: a theory of vertical and lateral integration. Journal of Political Economy 94: 691–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, G.W. and McKee, M. 1985. Experimental evaluation of the Coase theorem. Journal of Law and Economics 28: 653–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, O. 1995. Firms, Contracts, and Financial Structure. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, E. and Spitzer, M.L. 1982. The Coase theorem: some experimental tests. Journal of Law and Economics 25: 73–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, E. and Spitzer, M.L. 1985. Entitlements, rights and fairness: an experimental examination of subjects’ concepts of distributive justice. Journal of Legal Studies 14: 259–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, E. and Spitzer, M.L. 1986. Experimental tests of the Coase theorem with large bargaining groups. Journal of Legal Studies 15: 149–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahnemann, D., Knetsch, J.L. and Thaler, R.H. 1990. Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. Journal of Political Economy 98: 1325–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, R. and Lancaster, K. 1956. The general theory of second best. Review of Economic Studies 24: 11–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luenberger, D. 1995. Microeconomic Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAfee, R.P. and McMillan, J. 1996. Analysing the airwaves auction. Journal of Economic Perspectives 10(1): 159–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meade, J. 1952. External economies and diseconomies in a competitive situation. Economic Journal 62: 54–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medema, S.G. 1995. The Legacy of Ronald Coase in Economic Analysis. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P. and Roberts, J. 1992. Economics, Organization and Management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishan, E.J. 1967. Pareto optimality and the law. Oxford Economic Papers 19: 255–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modigliani, F. and Miller, M.H. 1958. The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. American Economic Review 48: 261—97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigou, A.C. 1932. The Economics of Welfare. 4th edn, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan, D.H. 1972. The problem of social cost revisited. Journal of Lam and Economics 15: 427—37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavell, S. 1980. Strict liability versus negligence. Journal of Legal Studies 9: 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidgwick, H. 1901. The Principles of Political Economy. 3rd edn, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, A.W.B. 1996. Coase vs. Pigou re-examined. Journal of Legal Studies 25: 53–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starret, D. 1972. Fundamental non-convexities in the theory of externalities. Journal of Economic Theory 4: 180–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G.J. 1966. The Theory of Price. 3rd edn, New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G.J. 1988. Memoirs of an Unregulated Economist. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Zandt, D. 1993. The lessons of the lighthouse: ‘government’ or ‘private’ provision of goods. Journal of Legal Studies 22: 47–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellisz, S. 1964. On external diseconomies and the government assisted invisible hand. Economica 31: 345–62.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2002 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this entry

Cite this entry

de Meza, D. (2002). Coase Theorem. In: Newman, P. (eds) The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-74173-1_57

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-74173-1_57

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-99756-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-74173-1

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History Collection

Publish with us

Policies and ethics