Skip to main content

Crime Mapping as a Tool for Security and Crime Prevention

  • Chapter
The Handbook of Security

Abstract

There is no doubt that crime mapping is now a mainstream practice in police organizations and the security industry more generally (Wartell and McEwen, 2001). For example, a Home Office survey (Weir and Bangs, 2007) conducted in 2005, with responses from 35 of the 43 UK police forces and many of the UK Crime and Disorder Reduction Partnerships (CDRPs), revealed that 90% of the 171 respondents used Geographic Information Systems (GIS), with three-quarters using them at least weekly. In terms of training, most respondents assessed themselves as competent or proficient users. Commonly used methods included point mapping of individual incidents of crime (86%) and the thematic mapping of data to boundaries such as local authority wards or police beats (80%). Only 50% of respondents used hotspot mapping and where used kernel density estimation (a smoothed risk surface over which crime risk is interpolated from a point pattern) and grid thematic mapping were employed. Of practical concern, when asked how the mapping they undertook informed operational decisions, only 29% felt that it was always or frequently used, with 25% stating that their analyses were very infrequently or never used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Boba, R. (2005). Crime Analysis and Crime Mapping. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, K.J. and Johnson, S.D. (2005). Domestic Burglary Repeats and Space-Time Clusters: The Dimensions of Risk.. European Journal of Criminology, 2(1), 67–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, K. J., Johnson, S. D., Guerette, R., Summers, L., and Poynton, S. (2011). Do Geographically Focussed Police Initiatives Displace Crime or Diffuse Benefits? A Systematic Review.. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7(4), 347–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, K.J., Johnson, S.D. and Pease, K. (2004). Prospective Hot-Spotting: The Future of Crime Mapping? The. British Journal of Criminology, 44(5), 641–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braga, A.A. (2005). Hot Spots Policing and Crime Prevention: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1(3), 317–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D.E., Liu, H. and Xue, Y. (2000). Mining Preferences from Spatial-Temporal Data. Paper presented at First SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, Chicago, IL, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chainey, S. and Ratcliffe, J. (2005). GIS and Crime Mapping. Chichester: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chainey, S. and Tompson, L. (2012). Engagement, Empowerment and Transparency: Publishing Crime Statistics Using Online Crime Mapping.. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice 6(3), 228–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamard, S. (2003). The Adoption and Discontinuance of Computerized Crime Mapping by Municipal Police Departments in New Jersey. Dissertation, School of Criminal Justice, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamard, S. (2006) The History of Crime Mapping and Its Use by American Police Departments. Alaska Justice Forum, 23(3), 1, 4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R.V. and Eck, J. (2003). Become a Problem Solving Crime Analyst in 55 Small Steps. London: Jill Dando Institute of Crime Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eck, J.E. and Spelman, W. (1987). Newport News Tests Problem-Oriented Policing. U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding, M. and Jones, V. (2012). ‘Disrupting the Optimal Forager’: Predictive Risk Mapping and Domestic Burglary Reduction in Trafford, Greater Manchester.. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 14(1), 30–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • (Goldstein, H. (1979) Improving Policing: A Problem-Oriented Approach. Crime and Delinquency, April 1979 25(2), 236–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorr, W.L and Olligschlaeger, A. (2001). Crime Hotspot Forecasting: Modeling and Comparative Evaluation. (Draft Final Report.) Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorr, W.L., A. Olligschlaeger, and Y. Thompson (2003). Short-Term Forecasting of Crime. International Journal of Forecasting, 19(4), 579–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groff, E.R. and LaVigne, N.G. (2002). Forecasting the Future of Predictive Crime Mapping, in Tilley, N. (ed.). Analysis for Crime Prevention. Volume. 13. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press. pp. 29–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groff, E., Kearley, B., Fogg, H., Beatty, P., Couture, H. and Wartell, J. (2005) A Randomised Experimental Study of Sharing Crime Data with Citizens: Do Maps Produce More Fear? Journal of Experimental Criminology 1, 87–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grubesic, T.H. and Mack, E.A. (2008). Spatio-Temporal Interaction of Urban Crime.. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 24, 285–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, A.G. (1971). Spectra of Some Self-Exciting and Mutually Exciting Point Processes.. Biometrika, 58(1), 83–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Home Office (2012.) Police.uk Website Analysis. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S.D. (2008). Repeat Burglary Victimization: A Tale of Two Theories.. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 4, 215–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S.D., Birks, D, McLaughlin, L., Bowers, K.J. and Pease, K. (2007). Prospective Mapping in Operational Context. Home Office Online Report 19/07. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S.D. and Bowers, K.J. (2004a). The Burglary as Clue to the Future: The Beginnings of Prospective Hot-Spotting.. European Journal of Criminology, 1(2), 237–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S.D. and Bowers, K.J. (2004b). The Stability of Space-Time Clusters of Burglary. The. British Journal of Criminology, 44(1), 55–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S.D. and Bowers, K.J. (2007). Burglary Prediction: Theory, Flow and Friction, in Farrell, G., Bowers, K., Shane, J.D. and Townsley, M. (eds.). Crime Prevention Studies. Volume. 21, 203–224. New York: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S.D. and Bowers, K.J. (2010). Permeability and Crime Risk: Are Cul-de-sacs Safer?. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26, 113–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S.D., Bowers, K. and Pease, K. (2005). Predicting the Future or Summarising the Past? Crime Mapping as Anticipation, in Smith, M. and Tilley, N. (eds.) Crime Science: New Approaches to Preventing and Detecting Crime. London: Willan. pp. 145–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S.D. and Braithwaite, A. (2009). Spatio-Temporal Modelling of Insurgency in Iraq. Crime Prevention Studies. Volume. 25. Cullompton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S.D., Summers, L. and Pease, K. (2009). Offender as Forager? A Direct Test of the Boost Account of Victimization.. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25, 181–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, L., Caplan, J. and Piza, E. (2011). Risk Clusters, Hotspots, and Spatial Intelligence: Risk Terrain Modeling as an Algorithm for Police Resource Allocation Strategies. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 27(3), 339–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohler, G.O., Short, M.B., Brantingham, P.J., Schoenberg, F.P. and Tita, G.E. (2011). Self-Exciting Point Process Modeling of Crime. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 106 (493), 100–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller, J. (2011). https://www.google.co.uk/?gws_rd=cr&ei=Smx7UojMPOPT0QW6q4GQCw#q=john+muller+(2011)+prediction&safe=active.

  • National Criminal Intelligence Service (2000). The National Intelligence Model. NCIS Corporate Communications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olligschlaeger, A.M. (1997). Artificial Neural Networks and Crime Mapping, in Weisburd, D. and McEwen, T. (eds.) Crime Mapping and Crime Prevention. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozdemir, H (2010). Compstat: Strategic Police Management for Effective Crime Deterrence in New York City. IPES/DCAF Working Paper No 30, March 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pease, K. (1998). Repeat Victimisation: Taking Stock (Home Office Crime Prevention and Detection Series, Paper No. 90). London, UK: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, W.L., McInnis, B., Price, C.C., Smith, S. and Hollywood, J.S. (2013). Predictive Policing: The Role of Crime Forecasting in Law Enforcement Operations. Washington, DC: Rand Corporation, xiii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitcher, A. and Johnson, S.D. (2011). Testing Theories of Victimization Using a Mathematical Model of Burglary.. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48(1), 83–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinton, P. (2011) The Impact of Information about Crime and Policing on Public Perceptions: The Results of a Randomised Controlled Trial. London: NPIA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe, J.H. and Rengert, G.F. (2008). Near-Repeat Patterns in Philadelphia Shootings.. Security Journal, 21(1), 58–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray, K., Davidson, R., Husain F., Vegeris, S., Vowden K. and Karn, J. (2012). Perceptions of the Policing and Crime Mapping ‘Trailblazers’. Home Office, Policing Research and Analysis, Research Report 67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, R., Ross, K., Finch, B., Luo, W. and MacEachren, A. (2013). Spatio-Temporal Crime Analysis in U.S. Law Enforcement Agencies: Current Practices and Unmet Needs.. Government Information Quarterly, 30(2013), 226–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, C. and Mueller-Johnson, K. (In preparation). ‘Super-Cocooning’ and the Prevention of Near Repeats in Domestic Burglary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, L., Johnson, S.D. and Rengert, G. (2010). The Use of Maps in Offender Interviews, in Bernasco, W. (ed.) Offender on Offending: Learning About Crime from Criminals. Cullompton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsley, M., Homel, R. and Chaseling, J. (2003) Infectious Burglaries: A Test of the Near Repeat Hypothesis. British Journal of Criminology, 43, 615–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsley, M.T., Johnson, S.D. and Ratcliffe, J.R. (2008). Space–Time Dynamics of Insurgent Activity in Iraq.. Security Journal, 21(3), 139–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Travis, L.F. and Hughes, K.D. (2002). Overcoming the Barriers: Crime Mapping in the 21st Century Number 2, August 2002. Police Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, W.F. (2001). Compstat: An Analysis of an Emerging Police Managerial Paradigm.. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 24(3), 347–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wartell, J. and McEwen, J.T. (2001). Privacy in the Information Age: A Guide for Sharing Crime Maps and Spatial Data Series: Research Report. Institute for Law and Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weir, R. and Bangs, M. (2007). The Use of Geographic Information Systems by crime Analysts in England and Wales. Home Office Online Report 03/07.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Kate Bowers and Shane D. Johnson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bowers, K., Johnson, S.D. (2014). Crime Mapping as a Tool for Security and Crime Prevention. In: Gill, M. (eds) The Handbook of Security. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-67284-4_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics