Abstract
Geographical space matters for economics in at least two fundamental ways. First, space is a factor of production and a consumption good. Second, it separates economic agents, thereby imposing constraints on their interaction. For example, an urban economic model contains both: residential land is a good while urban transportation must be used to overcome the friction of distance. A third way in which space matters arises in the context of public economics. There, introducing geographical space generates interaction between private and local public sectors which can be affected by the way political jurisdictions are drawn. For example, in economies with public goods, the location of a political boundary determines the very nature of spillovers and thus affects public policy. At a more basic level, drawing political boundaries over a resource-diversified territory can determine jurisdictions with unequal resource endowments and production capabilities. It follows that a political boundary creates public wealth inequalities which may affect the distribution of welfare over the land. For example, the recent split of the former Soviet Union into smaller political entities will sharpen wealth inequalities. In the opposite direction, Western Europe has moved a long way towards removing political boundaries.
Chapter prepared for a Festschrift in honour of M. Greenhut. We thank J. R. Melvin for helpful discussions. Research support from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada Grants 410-91-1851 and 410-91-0906 is gratefully acknowledged.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Boadway, R. W. (1982) ‘On the Method of Taxation and the Provision of Local Public Goods: Comment’, American Economic Review, vol. 72, pp. 846–51.
Boadway, R. W. and D. E. Wildasin (1984) Public Sector Economics, 2nd edn (Boston, Mass.: Little, Brown).
Burbidge, J. B. and G. M. Myers (1991) ‘Redistribution Within and Across the Regions of a Federation’, Working Paper 9107, Waterloo Economic Series (Waterloo, Ontario University of Waterloo ).
Flatters, F., J. V. Henderson and P. Mieszkowski (1974) ‘Public Goods, Efficiency and Regional Fiscal Equalization’, Journal of Public Economics, vol. 3, pp. 99–112.
Hercowitz, Z. and D. Pines (1991) ‘Migration with Fiscal Externalities’, Journal of Public Economics, vol. 46, pp. 163–80.
Mansoorian, A. and G. M. Myers (1992) ‘Attachment to Home and Efficient Purchases of Population in a Fiscal Externality Economy’, Journal of Public Economics (forthcoming).
Myers, G. M. (1990) ‘Optimality, Free Mobility, and the Regional Authority in a Federation’, Journal of Public Economics, vol. 43, pp. 107–21.
Myers, G. M. and Y. Y. Papageorgiou (1993) ‘Fiscal Inequivalence, Incentive Equivalence and Pareto Efficiency in a Decentralised Urban Context’, Journal of Urban Economics, vol. 33, pp. 29–47.
Starrett, D. A. (1980) ‘On the Method of Taxation and the Provision of Local Public Goods’, American Economic Review, vol. 70, pp. 380–92.
Starrett, D. A. (1982) ‘On the Method of Taxation and the Provision of Local Public Goods: Reply’, American Economic Review, vol. 72, pp. 852–3.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1993 Hiroshi Ohta and Jacques-François Thisse
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Myers, G.M., Papageorgiou, Y.Y. (1993). On the Economic Impact of Political Boundaries Over a Resource-Diversified Territory. In: Ohta, H., Thisse, JF. (eds) Does Economic Space Matter?. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22906-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22906-2_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-22908-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-22906-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)