Skip to main content

Dream and Fantasy in Goncharov’s Oblomov

  • Chapter
From Pushkin to Palisandriia

Abstract

Discussing the processes of literary creation, Goncharov placed his own writing firmly in the category of ‘unconscious creativity’, as opposed to art that stemmed from an idea or concept.1 By this he meant that when his creative imagination was stirred, he saw images and scenes which flowed fluently from his pen. A consequence of Goncharov’s artistic method was that he tended not to write his novels from beginning to end, but to tackle a work piecemeal as his imagination dictated (VIII, 70–71). This spontaneous method, which drew on the unconscious via the imagination, had the effect in his most famous novel, Oblomov (1859), of transforming the character of Il’ia Il’ich Oblomov from a specific social type, a landowner of a particular time and place, into an archetype, something that Goncharov himself realised fully only after the book had appeared (VIII, 71). At the same time he stressed that the roots of his unconscious creativity lay not in fancy but in life: ‘I wrote only what I had experienced, what I thought and loved, and what I saw close at hand and knew, — in a word, I described both my own life and what had become part of it’ (VIII, 113). While the insistence on life as the source of his creativity is typical of contemporary demands that literature reflect life, there is here at the same time an implied disapproval of imagination unfettered by reality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. ‘Luchshe pozdno chem nikogda’ (‘Better late than never’, 1879), in I. A. Goncharov, Sobranie sochinenii v vos’mi tomakh (Moscow, 1952–55), Vol. VIII (1955), pp. 69–70, 113. Future references to Goncharov’s work will be to this edition, in the form of volume number and page only.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Curiously, this aspect of the novel has been underplayed by critics. For example N. I. Prutskov, Masterstvo Goncharova-romanista (Moscow-Leningrad, 1962) is concerned to place the novel in the context of the traditions of Russian realism.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. G. Tseitlin, I. A. Goncharov (Moscow, 1950) examines the novel’s characters and structure in a sociological and socio-historical context. Vsevolod Setchkarev, Ivan Goncharov. His Life and Works (Würzburg, Jal-Verlag, 1974), is primarily interested in the novel as a philosophical rather than sociological work. Jean Blot, Ivan Goncharov, ou le réalisme impossible (Paris, Editions de l’Age de l’Homme, 1986) pays close attention to the main nostalgic dream, but ignores the others.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Alexandra Lyngstad and Sverre Lyngstad, Ivan Goncharov (Twayne WAS200, New York, 1971), pp. 81–2, 89, do touch on the importance of Oblomov’s other dreams as well, but the fullest treatment is in

    Google Scholar 

  5. Milton Ehre, Oblomov and his Creator. The Life and Art of Ivan Goncharov (Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1973) who subordinates this aspect of the novel to a consideration of pervasive patterns, rhythms, motifs and structures.

    Google Scholar 

  6. V. S. Pritchett, The Living Novel (London, Chatto & Windus, 1976), p. 239.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kenneth E. Harper, ‘Under the Influence of Oblomov’, in Vladimir Markov and Dean S. Worth (eds), From Los Angeles to Kiev. Papers on the Occasion of the Ninth International Congress of Slavists, Kiev, September, 1983 (Columbus, Slavica, 1983), pp. 105–18, makes a cogent case for the novel as one in which the author is not really in control, that it is Oblomov himself who rules over ‘the telling of the tale’ (p. 107), and as a result this novel is much better than the other two by Goncharov where authorial control is tighter.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Medved’ na lipovoi noge, no. 161 A* in A. Aarne, The Types of the Folk Tale, 2nd edition revised by S. Thompson, Folklore Fellows Communications 184 (Helsinki, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  9. On the Tale of Bova Korolevich, see V. D. Kuzmina, Rytsarskii roman na Rusi (Moscow, 1964); on Eruslan Lazarevich, see

    Google Scholar 

  10. L. N. Pushkarev, Skazka o Eruslane Lazareviche (Moscow, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1990 School of Slavonic and East European Studies, University of London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wigzell, F. (1990). Dream and Fantasy in Goncharov’s Oblomov. In: McMillin, A. (eds) From Pushkin to Palisandriia. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21065-7_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics