Skip to main content

Stochastic Unfolding

  • Chapter
Sociometric Research

Abstract

In survey research we regularly encounter the following type of question: ‘Which of these stimuli do you prefer most?, which of the remaining ones do you now prefer most?’ etcetera. Sometimes a full rank order of preferences is asked in this way, more often only a partial rank order is obtained. Sometimes even only the question is asked: ‘Which k of these n stimuli do you prefer most?’, or, even more generally, ‘Which of these n stimuli do you prefer?’ These questions can be referred to as ‘rank n/n’, ‘rank k/n’, ‘pick k/n’, and ‘pick any/n’ data, respectively. Stimuli may be political parties, candidates, career possibilities or brand names of some consumer good. Rather than asking about ‘preference’ the questions may also be phrased in terms of other evaluative concepts like ‘sympathy’ or ‘importance’. In this chapter I will be concerned with analysing such data of the form ‘pick k/n’ or ‘pick any/n’ data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • BECHTEL, G. G., Multidimensional Preference Scaling (The Hague: Mouton, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • BENNETT, J. F. and HAYS W. L., ‘Multidimensional Unfolding: Determining the Dimensionality of Ranked Preference Data’, Psychometrika, 25 (1960) 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BISHOP, Y. M. M., FIENBERG, S. E. and HOLLAND, P. W., Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • CARROLL, J. D., ‘Individual Differences and Multidimensional Scaling’, in SHEPARD, R. N. et al (eds) Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications in the Behavioral Sciences, vol. I: Theory (New York: Seminar Press, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • COOMBS, C. H., ‘Psychological Scaling Without a Unit of Measurement’, Psychological Review, 57 (1950) 148–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——, A Theory of Data (New York: Wiley & Son, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • DAVISON, M. L., ‘Testing a Unidimensional, Qualitative Unfolding Model for Attitudinal or Developmental Data’, Psychometrika, 44 (1979) 179–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GOLD, E. M., ‘Metric Unfolding: Data Requirements for Unique Solutions and Clarifications of Schönemann’s Algorithm’, Psychometrika, 38 (1973) 555–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HEISER, W. J., ‘Unfolding Analysis of Proximity Data’, University of Leiden: unpublished dissertion, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • JANSEN, P. G. W. (1983). ‘Rasch Analysis of Attitudinal Data’, Catholic University of Nijmegen — Rijks Psychologische Dienst, Den Haag: unpublished dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  • KRUSKAL, J. B., YOUNG, F. W. and SEERY, J. B., ‘How to Use KYST: A Very Flexible Program to do Multidimensional Scaling and Unfolding’ (Murray Hill: Bell Labs, mimeo, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • LOEVINGER, J., ‘The Technique of Homogeneous Tests composed with Some Aspects of ‘Scale Analysis’ and Factors Analysis’; Psychological Bulletin, 45 (1948) 507–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MEERLING, F., Methoden en Technieken van Psychologisch Onderzoek, deel 2: Data-analyse en Psychometrie (Meppel: Boom, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • MOKKEN, R. J., A Theory and Procedure of Scale Analysis, with Application in Political Research (The Hague: Mouton, 1971).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ROSKAM, E. E., Metric Analysis of Ordinal Data (Voorschoten: VAM, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHÖNEMANN, P. H., ‘On Metric Multidimensional Unfolding’, Psychometrika, 35 (1970) 349–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VAN SCHUUR, H., Structure in Political Beliefs: A New Model for Stochastic Unfolding with Application to European Party Activists (Amsterdam: CT Press, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • ——, and MOLENAAR, I. W., ‘MUDFOLD, Multiple Stochastic Unidimensional Unfolding’, in CAUSSINUS, H., ETTINGER, P. and THOMASSONE, R. (eds) COMPSTAT 1982, part I: Proceedings in Computational Statistics (Vienna: Physica-Verlag, 1982) 419–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • SIXTL, F., ‘Probabilistic Unfolding’, Psychometrika, 38 (1973) 235–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TVERSKY, A., ‘Elimination by Aspects: A Theory of Choice’, Psychological Review, 79 (1972) 281–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • YOUNG, F. W., ‘A Model for Polynomial Conjoint Analysis Algorithms’, in SHEPARD, R. N. et al. (eds) Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications in the Behavioral Sciences, vol. I: Theory (New York: Seminar Press, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • ZINNES, J. L. and GRIGGS, R. A., ‘Probabilistic Multidimensional Unfolding Analysis’, Psychometrika, 39 (1974) 327–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1988 Willem E. Saris and Irmtraud N. Gallhofer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van Schuur, W.H. (1988). Stochastic Unfolding. In: Saris, W.E., Gallhofer, I.N. (eds) Sociometric Research. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19051-5_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics