Skip to main content

Goffman on Power, Hierarchy, and Status

  • Chapter
The View from Goffman

Abstract

Among the most commonly overlooked set of insights offered by Erving Goffman is his commentary, comprised of both explicit and implicit elements, on the interrelationship among power, hierarchy, and status in everyday life. In fact, Goffman has been subject to criticism for his apparent failure to treat these sorts of stratification-related phenomena. To date the most detailed critique of Goffman along these lines is Alvin Gouldner’s analysis.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Chapter Endnotes

  1. Alvin W. Gouldner, The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology, ( New York; Avon Books, 1970 ) pp. 378–90.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ibid., p. 379; related criticisms have been advanced by Harold Garfinkel, Studies in Ethnomethodology, (Englewood Cliffs; Prentice-Hall, 1967) p. 174; and by J. R. Young and Garth Massey, ‘The Dramaturgical Society: A Macro Analytic Approach to Dramaturgical Analysis’, Unpublished paper, (The Red Feather Institute, Colorado State University, n.d.).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alvin W. Gouldner, For Sociology, ( New York, Basic Books, 1973 ) p. 347.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mary F. Rogers, ‘Instrumental and Infra-Resources: The Bases of Power’, American journal of Sociology, Volume 79, (May, 1974) pp. 1418–33. Briefly put, instrumental resources are the means of influence, those attributes, circumstances, and possessions which can be activated or invoked to reward, punish, and/or persuade others. Infra-resources, on the other hand, are those attributes, circumstances, and/or possessions which relative to a given situation must be had before one’s relevant instrumental resources can be activated or invoked.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. See, for example, Dorwin Cartwright, ‘Influence, Leadership, Control’, pp. 147, in James G. March (ed) Studies in Social Power, ( Ann Arbor; University of Michigan Press, 1965 ) p. 4

    Google Scholar 

  6. Terry N. Clark, ‘The Concept of Power’, pp. 1–47, in Terry N. Clark (ed) Community Structure and Decision-Making, ( San Francisco; Chandler, 1968 ) p. 47

    Google Scholar 

  7. William Gamson, Power and Discontent, ( Homewood, Illinois; Dorsey, 1968 ) p. 60

    Google Scholar 

  8. Andrew S. McFarland, Power and Leadership in Pluralist Systems, (Stanford; Stanford University Press, 1969) p. 6

    Google Scholar 

  9. Talcott Parsons, ‘On the Concept of Political Power’, pp. 251–284, in Roderick Bell, David V. Edwards, and R. Harrison Wagner, (eds) Political Power, ( New York; Free Press, 1969 ) p. 226

    Google Scholar 

  10. William H. Riker, ‘Some Ambiguities in the Notion of Power’, pp. 110–19, in Bell Edwards, and Wagner, (eds), op. cit., p. 117

    Google Scholar 

  11. Herbert A. Simon, ‘The Nature of Authority’, pp. 123–127, in William A. Glaser and David L. Sills (eds) The Government of Associations, ( Totowa, New Jersey; Bedminster Press, 1966 ) p. 123.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See John O’Neill, Sociology as a Skin Trade, ( New York; Harper and Row, 1972 ) p. 216.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sensitive to that profundity, Ernest Becker, in Escape from Evil, (New York; Free Press, 1975) pp. 15, 13, acknowledges that, ‘many people have scoffed at Goffman’s delineation of the everyday modern rituals of face-work and status forcing’, and yet Becker maintains that Goffman has shown with, ‘consumate art how people impart to one another the daily sense that each needs, not with rivalry and boasting, but rather with elaborate rules for protecting their insides against social damage and deflation.’

    Google Scholar 

  14. Harold Garfinkel, ‘Studies of the Routine Grounds of Everyday Activities’, pp. 1–30, in David Sudnow, (ed) Studies in Social Interaction, ( New York; Free Press, 1972 ) p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  15. See, C. Wright Mills, White Collar, (New York; Oxford University Press, 1956 ).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Max Lerner, America as a Civilisation, Volume II, Culture and Personality, (New York; Clarion Books, Simon and Schuster, 1957) p. 488.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kurt B. Meyer, ‘The Changing Shape of the American Class Structure’, pp. 62–69, in Holger R. Stub (ed), Status Communities in Modern Society, ( Hinsdale, Illinois; Dryden Books, 1972 ) pp. 66–7.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hans Gerth and C. Wright Mills, Character and Social Structure, (New York; Harcourt, Brace and World, 1953) p. 321; and Lerner, 1957, op. cit., P. 475.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Richard Sennett and Jonathan Cobb, The Hidden Injuries of Class, ( New York; Vintage Books, 1973 ).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Jason Ditton

Copyright information

© 1980 Mary F. Rogers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rogers, M.F. (1980). Goffman on Power, Hierarchy, and Status. In: Ditton, J. (eds) The View from Goffman. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16268-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics