Skip to main content

Determinants of Innovation: A Microeconometric Analysis of Three Alternative Innovation Output Indicators

  • Chapter
Determinants of Innovation

Abstract

Taking into account the shortcomings of R&D and patents mentioned in the introductory chapter, new indicators have been developed for the output side of the innovation process. Three of these new output indicators will be analyzed in this chapter, using data from The Netherlands. These indicators consist of:

  1. (i)

    a collection of new product announcements in 1989 from a large number of trade journals in The Netherlands; and

  2. (ii)

    the share of innovative products in a firm’s total sales, the latter being subdivided into:

    • products ‘new to the sector’ (that is, not introduced earlier by a competitor); and

    • products ‘new to the firm’ (that is, already known in the sector).

While products new to the sector may be conceived of as being ‘true’ innovations, products new to the firm will often be based on imitation of products introduced earlier by competitors. These two new indicators were obtained by asking innovative firms to subdivide their total product range into three types of product, namely:

  1. (i)

    products essentially unchanged during 1990–2;

  2. (ii)

    products incrementally improved during 1990–2; and

  3. (iii)

    products radically changed or newly introduced during 1990–2.

Firms were then asked to report the percentages of their 1992 sales which were related to each of the three categories of product named.

In this chapter we have drawn on the SEO databases on ‘Innovation in Dutch Manufacturing and Service Industries’ and on ‘Literature-based Innovation Output Indicators’. Our research has been supported by the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs, and by DG 12 and DG 13 of the European Commission. We wish to thank Kees Burger, Hans van Ophem and Geert Ridder for econometric advice, as well as participants of the workshop on innovation indicators, organised by DG 12 of the European Commission on 14 December 1994 at Brussels. The usual disclaimers apply.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Acs, Z. J. and D. B. Audretsch (1993) ‘Analyzing Innovation Output Indicators: The US Experience’, in A. Kleinknecht and D. Bain (eds), New Concepts in Innovation Output Measurement (London: Macmillan; New York: St Martin’s Press) pp. 10–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amemiya, T. (1985) Advanced Econometrics (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, E. and A. Kleinknecht (1994) ‘Innovation in Dutch Manufacturing and Service Industries (1992)’ (in Dutch), SEO Report to the Ministry of Economic Affairs, The Hague, Beleidsstudies Technologie Economie, vol. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G. (1988) ‘Sources, Procedures and Micro-economic Effects of Innovation’, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 26, pp. 1120–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geroski, P. A. and C. F. Walters (1995) ‘Innovative Activity Over the Business Cycle’, Economic Journal, vol. 105, pp. 916–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. (1990) ‘Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey’, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 28, pp. 1661–707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, G. G., W. E. Griffiths, R. Carter Hill, H. Lütkepohl and T.-C. Lee (1985) The Theory and Practice of Econometrics, 2nd edn (New York: John Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, K. (1986) Export and Technology (Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinknecht, A. and D. Bain (eds) (1993) New Concepts in Innovation Output Measurement (London: Macmillan; New York: St Martin’s Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinknecht, A. and J. O. N. Reijnen (1991) ‘New Evidence on the Undercounting of Small Firm R&D’, Research Policy, vol. 20, pp. 579–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinknecht, A. and B. Verspagen (1990) ‘Demand and Innovation: Schmookler Re-examined’, Research Policy, vol. 19, pp. 387–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinknecht, A., J. O. N. Reijuen and J. J. Verweij (1990) ‘Innovation in Dutch Manufacturing and Service Industries’ (in Dutch) SEO Report to the Ministry of Economic Affairs, The Hague, Beleidsstudies Technologic Economic, vol. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinknecht, A., T. P. Poot and J. O. N. Reijnen (1991) ‘Formal and Informal R&D and Firm Size: Survey Results from The Netherlands’, in Z. J. Acs and D. B. Audretsch, Innovation and Technological Change. An International Comparison. (London: Harvester Wheatsheaf) pp. 84–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G. S. (1983) Limited-dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics, (Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Manshanden, W. (1996) Commercial Services in a Regional Context (in Dutch), Ph. D. thesis, University of Amsterdam; Institute for Economic Geography.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Krahmer, F. (1984) ‘Recent Results in Measuring Innovation Output’, Research Policy, vol. 13, pp. 175–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullahy, J. (1986) ‘Specification and Testing of Some Modified Count Data Models’, Journal of Econometrics, vol. 33, pp. 341–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt, K. (1984) ‘Sectoral Patterns of Technological Change. Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory’, Research Policy, vol. 13, pp. 343–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. M. (1982) ‘Demand-pull and Technological Invention: Schmookler Revisited’, Journal of Industrial Economics, vol. 30, pp. 225–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmookler, J. (1966) Invention and Economic Growth (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. (1988) ‘Technological Change and the Nature of the Firm’, in G. Dosi et al. (eds), Technical Change and Economic Theory (London: Pinter) pp. 256–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, V. (1984) ‘Invention and Innovation in the Chemical Industry: Demand-pull or Discovery-push?’, Research Policy, vol. 13, pp. 211–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windmeijer, F. A. G. (1992) Goodness of Fit in Linear and Qualitative-choice Models, Ph. D. thesis, University of Amsterdam (Tinbergen Institute Research Series No. 29).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1996 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brouwer, E., Kleinknecht, A. (1996). Determinants of Innovation: A Microeconometric Analysis of Three Alternative Innovation Output Indicators. In: Kleinknecht, A. (eds) Determinants of Innovation. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13917-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics