Skip to main content

Abstract

In this chapter we will be concerned to identify the nature of the values implicit in the development of leisure policy, and their implications for the role of the leisure professional. The setting of management goals and the choice of means for their attainment are rarely purely technical issues. Such decisions take place within, and are often directly influenced by, the context of political values, attitudes and decisions. Political debates concerning the most appropriate division of responsibility between the public, voluntary and commercial sectors in leisure, the most effective role for local government (i.e., direct provision, subsidy, regulation, contract management) and the proper balance between income maximisation and catering for disadvantaged groups, all serve to emphasise the political dimensions of management decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bacon, W. (1980) Social Planning, Research and the Provision of Leisure Services, Centre for Leisure Studies, University of Salford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennington, J. and White, J. (1986) The Future Role and Organisation of Local Government Leisure, Institute of Local Government Studies, University of Birmingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennington, J. and White, J. (1988) The Future of Local Government Leisure Services, London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramham, P. and Henry, I. (1985) ‘Political Ideology and Leisure Policy in the United Kingdom’, Leisure Studies, 4 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramley, G. (1985) Grant-Related Expenditure and Recreation, SAUS Working Paper, 51, School of Advanced Urban Studies, Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, J. and Leaman, O. (1982) ‘Work for Some and Sport for All’, Youth and Policy, 1 (3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J. and Critcher, C. (1985) The Devil Makes Work: Leisure in Capitalist Britain, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coalter, F. (1986) ‘A Leisure Profession? Definitions and Dilemmas’, Local Government Policy Making (December).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coalter, F. (1988) ‘Leisure Policy: An Unresolvable Dualism?’ in Rojek, C. (ed.), Leisure for Leisure, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coalter, F., with Long J. and Duffield B. (1986) The Rationale for Public Sector Investment in Leisure, London: Sports Council/ESRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R. (1986a) ‘The Politics of Women’s Leisure’, in Coalter, F. (ed.), The Politics of Leisure, London: Leisure Studies Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R. (1986b) All Work and No Play? The Sociology of Women and Leisure, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of the Environment (1975) Sport and Recreation, London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of the Environment (1984) Recreation Management Training Committee Final Report (The Yates Committee), London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of the Environment (1987) Competition in the Management of Local Authority Sport and Leisure Facilities, London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dower, M. et al. (1981) Leisure Provision and People’s Needs, London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunleavy, P. (1980) Urban Political Analysis, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1962) Capitalism and Freedom, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, V. and Wilding, P. (1976) Ideology and Social Welfare, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gratton, C. and Taylor, P. (1985) Sport and Recreation: an Economic Analysis, London: E & F. N. Spon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haywood, L. and Henry, I. (1986) ‘Policy Developments in Community Leisure and Recreation’, Leisure Management, 6 (7) and 6 (8).

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, I. (1986) Alternative Futures for Leisure, Working Paper 4:1, Institute of Local Government Studies, University of Birmingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, I. and Bramham, P. (1986) ‘Leisure the Local State and Social Order’, Leisure Studies, 5 (2) May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M. and Bramley, G. (1986) Analysing Social Policy, London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoggett, P. and Bishop, J. (1985) The Social Organisation of Leisure: A Study of Groups in their Voluntary Sector Context, London: Sports Council/ESRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, E. (1986) ‘Management Development and Women in Leisure and Recreation’, Local Government Policy Making, 13 (3) (December).

    Google Scholar 

  • Limb, M. (1986) ‘Community Involvement in Leisure Provision — Private Enterprise or Public Interest?’ in Coalter, F. (ed.), The Politics of Leisure, London: Leisure Studies Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. (1954) Motivation and Personality, New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mennell, S. (1979) ‘Theoretical Considerations on Cultural Needs’, Sociology, 13 (2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, D. (1979) ‘The Concept of Recreational “Need”’, Journal of Leisure Research, 5 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, R. (1977) Society and Social Policy: Theoretical Perspectives on Welfare, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, W. (1986) ‘Professionalism and Recreation Provision in Local Government and Industry’, in Coalter, F. (ed.)., The Politics of Leisure, London: Leisure Studies Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry, N. and Johnson, D. (1974) Leisure and Social Strucutre, Hatfield Polytechnic, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigg, M. (1986) Action Sport: An Evaluation, London: Sports Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, K. (1978) Contemporary Society and the Growth of Leisure, London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scraton, S. (1987) ‘“Boys Muscle in Where Angels Fear to Tread” — Girls’ Subculture and Physical Activities’, in Horne, J. et al. (eds.), Sport, Leisure and Social Relations, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slade, T. (1985) ‘A Sociological Analysis of the Representation of Women Public Sports Centre Managers in England’, unpublished undergraduate dissertation, West Sussex Institute of Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sports Council, Greater London and South East (1988) A Capital Prospect: A Strategy for London Sport, London: London Council for Sport and Recreation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimbush, E. (1986) Women, Leisure and Well-Being. An Edinburgh-based study of the role and meaning of leisure in the lives of mothers with pre-school age children, Scotland: Centre for Leisure Research.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1990 Fred Coalter

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Coalter, F. (1990). Analysing Leisure Policy. In: Henry, I. (eds) Management and Planning in the Leisure Industries. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-10647-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics