Skip to main content

The Potentials and Limits of the Market in Resource Allocation

  • Chapter
Issues in Contemporary Microeconomics and Welfare

Abstract

The prestige status of the purest of pure economic theory has never been higher; and yet there is now, as there has always been, a pervasive scepticism about the descriptive power and normative utility of Walrasian or other varieties of the theory of general competitive equilibrium.1 The mutual adjustment of prices and quantities represented by the neoclassical model is an important aspect of economic reality worthy of the serious analysis that has been bestowed on it; and certain dramatic historical episodes suggest that an economic mechanism exists that is capable of adaptation to radical shifts in demand and supply conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrow, K. J. (1951) (new edn 1963) Social Choice and Individual Values, New York; John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1969) ‘The Organization of Economic Activity: Issues Pertinent to the Choice of Market Versus Nonmarket Allocation’, in US Congress, Joint Economic Committee, The Analysis and Evaluation of Public Expenditures: The PPB System, vol. 1, Washington: GPO, pp. 47–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1971) Essays in the Theory of Risk-Bearing, Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1974a) ‘Limited Knowledge and Economic Analysis’, American Economic Review, 64 (March): 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1974b) ‘General Economic Equilibrium: Purpose, Analytic Techniques, Collective Choice’, American Economic Review, 64 (June): 253–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1978) ‘The Future and the Present in Economic Life’, Economic Inquiry, 16 (April): 157–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1981a) ‘Introduction: The Social Choice Perspective’, in ‘Symposium: The Implications of Social Choice Theory for Legal Decisionmaking’, Hofstra Law Review, 9 (Summer): 1373–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1981b) ‘Futures Markets: Some Theoretical Perspectives’, Journal of Futures Markets, 1 (2): 107–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J., and L. Hurwicz (eds) (1977) Studies in Resource Allocation Processes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J., and M. D. Intriligator (eds) (1982) Handbook of Mathematical Economics, 3 vols, Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1985 George R. Feiwel

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Arrow, K.J. (1985). The Potentials and Limits of the Market in Resource Allocation. In: Feiwel, G.R. (eds) Issues in Contemporary Microeconomics and Welfare. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06876-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics