Abstract
Russian foreign policy at the turn of the twentieth century can perhaps best be understood in the context of what has been termed ‘conservative nationalism’.1 Under Witte the Ministry of Finance had presided over an economic policy designed to give Russia the wherewithal to take her full place as a European great power — a developed industry, a modern army and an efficient communication system. The theories behind the internal policies of the end of the nineteenth century, associated with the influential figure of Konstantin Pobedonostsev, were simultaneously concerned with the development of Russia as a powerful and united state. The autocracy was to be strong and centralised, ruling a nation unified in faith, government and, as far as possible, language. To Pobedonostsev and many of the bureaucracy in the 1890s Witte’s economic Westernisation did not promise political reform. On the contrary, it served as a method not of changing but of strengthening the autocracy and the state. Given unity and centralisation at home and a position as a great power in Europe, Russia would be in a position to fulfil her unique mission as a partially Asiatic power.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
E. C. Thaden, Conservative Nationalism in Nineteenth Century Russia (Seattle, 1964).
I. J. Lederer (ed.), Russian Foreign Policy (New Haven, 1962) pt I.
B. H. Sumner, Tsardom and Imperialism in the Far East and the Middle East, 1880–1914 (London, 1942).
D. J. Dallin, The Rise of Russia in Asia (New Haven, 1949). With regard to the Bosphorus, see Krasny Arkhiv, xvin (1926) 18–25.
J. A. White, The Diplomacy of the Russo-Japanese War (Princeton, 1964) pp. 26–8.
E. H. Zabriskie, American-Russian Rivalry in the Far East, 1895–1914 (Philadelphia, 1946) pp. 87–8; British Documents on the Origin of the War, 1898–1914, Iv, no. 181b (hereafter cited as B.D.).
See F. Kazemzadeh, Russia and Britain in Persia, 1864–1914 (New Haven, 1968) for a detailed study of Russian policy in Persia.
S. Witte, Vospominaniya (Berlin, 1922 ) II 407–8.
Kazemzadeh, Russia and Britain in Persia, pp. 401–2; P. C. Terenzio, La Rivalité anglo-russe en Perse et en Afghanistan (Paris, 1947) p. 81;
B. G. Martin, German-Persian Diplomatic Relations, 1873–1912 (The Hague, 1959) pp. 89–90.
G. Katkov and M. Futrell, ‘Russian Foreign Policy, 1880–1914’, in G. Katkov et al (eds.), Russia Enters the Twentieth Century (London, 1971) p. 27.
E. de Schelking, Recollections of a Russian Diplomat (New York, 1918) p. 168; C. L. Seeger (ed.), Memoirs of Alexander Iswolsky (London, n.d.) p. 178.
M. de Taube, La Politique russe d’avant-guerre et la fin de l’Empire des Tsars, 1904–17 (Paris, 1928) pp. 100–1.
R. E. Pipes, ‘Domestic Policy and Foreign Affairs’, in Lederer (ed.), Russian Foreign Policy, p. 154; for details, see A. Malozemoff, Russian Far Eastern Policy, 1881–1914 (Berkeley, 1958).
B. V. Anan’ich, ‘Krizis ekonomicheskoi politika tsarizma v Persil v 1904–6 gg’, Istoricheskie Zapiski, LXXIV (1963) 247.
White, The Diplomacy of the Russo-Japanese War, p. 206; B. Romanov, ‘Konets Russkoi-Yaponskoi voiny’, in Krasny Arkhiv, xxvLLL (3) (1928) 201.
R. Griault, ‘La Révolution russe de 1905 d’après quelques témoignages français’, Revue Historique, CCxxx (1963) 101.
F. Stieve, Isvolsky and the World War (London, 1926) p. 12; Bestuzhev, Bor’ba v Rossii, p. 25.
E. M. Rosental, Diplomaticheskaya istoriya russko- frantsuskogo soyuza v nachale XXv. (Moscow, 1960) p. 176; Taube, La Politique russe d’avant-guerre, pp. 100–1.
Rosental, Diplomaticheskaya istoriya, p. 4; H. Isvolsky, ‘The Fateful Years, 1906–11’, Russian Review (1969) pp. 194–6.
See B. Nolde, L’Alliance franco-russe (Paris, 1936) pp. 166–8; Pipes, in Lederer (ed.), Russian Foreign Policy, p. 150; Bestuzhev, Bor’ba v Rossii, p. 52.
Quoted in G. H. Bolsover, ‘Aspects of Russian Foreign Policy, 1815–1914’, in B. Pares and A. J. P. Taylor (eds.), Essays Presented to Sir Lewis Namier (London, 1956 ) p. 325.
H. H. Fisher (ed.), Memoirs of Count Kokovtsov: Out of My Past (Stanford, 1935) p. 215; Bestuzhev, Bor’ba v Rossii, p. 75.
Ibid., p. 157; H. Isvolsky (ed.), Alexandre Iswolsky. Au Service de la Russie. Correspondance diplomatique, 1906–11 (Paris, 1937) I 39–40.
H. Rogger, ‘The Formation of the Russian Right, 1900–6’, California Slavic Studies, in (1964) 78; Bestuzhev, Bor’ba v Rossii, p. 142; Isvolsky, Correspondance diplomatique, 192–3.
Bestuzhev, Bor’ba v Rossii, pp. 38, 44; A. V. Ignat’ev, Russko-angliiskie otnosheniya nakunune pervoi mirovoi voiny 1908–14 (Moscow, 1962) p. 16.
M. S. Miller, The Economic Development of Russia, 1905–14 (London, 1926).
O. Crisp, ‘Financial Aspect of the Franco-Russian Alliance, 1894–1914’, unpublished Ph.D. thesis (London, 1954) p. 384.
Dnevnik A. N. Kuropatkina, Krasny Arkhiv, II (1922) 83; White, The Diplomacy of the Russo-Japanese War, p. 47.
Note of French Minister of War, 28 July 1908, M. des A. E., N. S. (Eur.) 16; K. F. Shatsillo, ‘O disproportsii v razvitii voorushennykh sil Rossii nakanune pervoi mirovoi voiny 1906–14 gg.’, Istoricheskie Zapiski, LXXXNL (1969) 128.
Ignat’ev, Russko-angliiskie otnosheniya, p. 63; Bestuzhev, Bomba v Rossii, p. 137; A. M. Zaionchkovsky, Podgotovka Rossi k mirovoi voine v mezhdunarodnom otnoshenii (Leningrad, 1926) pp. 134–6.
K. F. Shatsillo, Ruskii imperializm i razvitie flora (Moscow, 1968) p. 48.
See R. P. Churchill, The Anglo-Russian Convention of 1907 (Cedar Rapids, Iowa, 1939), and B.D., Iv.
Spring-Rice to Lansdowne, 27 Apr 1904, no. 206, F.O. 1627; M. Bompard, Mon ambassade en Russie 1903–8 (Paris, 1937) p. 236.
Contemporary Review (July 1904) p. 41. See also E. J. Dillon, The Eclipse of Russia (London, 1918).
Gurko, Features and Figures of the Past, pp. 416–17. See also T. H. von Laue, ‘Sergei Witte and the Russian Revolution of 1905’, American Slavic and East European Review (1958).
Gurko, Features and Figures of the Past, pp. 455–7; G. P. Gooch, Studies in Diplomacy (London, 1942) p. 291. Witte, in fact, resigned.
Quoted in T. Riha, A Russian European (Notre Dame, Ind., 1969) pp. 123–4.
Baron Rosen, Forty Years of Diplomacy (New York, 1922) II 48.
H. Isvolsky, in Russian Review, p. 194. See also E. Chmielewski, ‘Stolypin and the Ministerial Crisis of 1909’, California Slavic Studies, IV (1967) 4, for Stolypin’s contacts with the Octobrists.
O. Crisp, ‘The Russian Liberals and the 1906 Anglo-French Loan’, Slavonic Review (1961) pp. 499–500; Krasny Arkhiv, xvi (12) (1925) 427, zaem 1906 g.
J. P. Sontag, ‘Tsarist Debts and Tsarist Foreign Policy’, American Slavic and East European Review, IV (1968) 538–40. See also the article by Pipes in Lederer (ed.), Russian Foreign Policy.
See B. J. Williams, ‘The Strategic Background to the Anglo-Russian Entente of 1907’, Historical Journal, IX 3 (1966).
Ignat’ev, Russko-angliiskie otnosheniya, p. 67; M. N. Pokrovsky, Vneshnyaya politika Rossii v XX veke (Moscow, 1926) pp. 37–8.
P. Renouvin, ‘Les Relations franco-russes à la fin du XIXe s.’, in Cahiers du monde russe et sovietique (1959–61) I 133.
Lamsdorff to Benckendorff, 31 Mar 1905, quoted in O. F. Solov’ev, ‘K voprosu ob otnoshenii Tsarskoi Rossii k Indii v XIX-nachale XX veke’, Voprosy Istorii, VI (1958) 105.
A. L. Sidorov, ‘Iz istorii podgotovki tsarizma k pervoi mirovoi voine’, Istoricheski Arkhiv, II (1962) 120.
Gurko, Features and Figures of the Past, p. 417; V. A. Petrov, Ocherki po istorii revolyutsionnogo dvizheniya v russkoi armii v 1905 g. (Moscow, 1964) pp. 383–4.
Gurko, Features and Figures of the Past, pp. 417–18; J. Keep, The Rise of Social Democracy in Russia (Oxford, 1963) p. 238.
E. Yaroslaysky, Istoriya VKP (Moscow, 1926–30) II 697. Keep, The Rise of Social Democracy in Russia, pp. 271–3, argues that the S.D.s had little real control over army mutinies in 1905.
D. Lang, A Modern History of Georgia (London, 1962) p. 164.
R. Pierce, Russian Central Asia, 1867–1917 (Berkeley, 1960).
See I. Spector, The First Russian Revolution: Its Impact on Asia (Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1962).
Quoted in P. N. Efremov, Vneshnaya politika Rossii 1907–14 (Moscow, 1961) pp. 78–9; Kazemzadeh, Russia and Britain in Persia, p. 528.
Meeting of 14/27 Apr 1907, Krasny Arkhiv, LXIX-LXX (1935) 26. See E. W. Edwards, ‘The Far East Agreements of 1907’, Journal of Modern History (1954).
B. von Siebert, Entente Diplomacy and the World, 1909–14 (London, 1921) pp. 25–7.
F. Hudson, The Far East in World Politics (London, 1939) pp. 158–9.
C. Vevier, The United States and China, 1906–13 ( New Brunswick, N.J., 1955 ) pp. 143–4.
H. Coly, Willard Straight (New York, 1924) pp. 306–8; Vevier, The United States and China, pp. 32–4; Nicolson to Grey, 29 Nov 1909, no. 682, F.O. 371/842.
E. B. Price, Russo-Japanese Treaties of 1907–16 concerning Manchuria and Mongolia (Baltimore, 1933) p. 44.
See F. Lindberg, Scandinavia in Great Power Politics, 1905–8 (Stockholm, 1958) pp. 95–101.
Rosental, ‘Frantsuskaya diplomatiya i anglo-russkoe sblizhenie v 1906–7 gg’, Istoriya SSSR, V (1958) 136; Bestuzhev, in Istoricheskie Zapiski, p. 139; Isvolsky, Correspondance diplomatique, i 293–5.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 1974 Beryl J. Williams
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Williams, B.J. (1974). The Revolution of 1905 and Russian Foreign Policy. In: Abramsky, C. (eds) Essays in Honour of E. H. Carr. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-01725-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-01725-6_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-01727-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-01725-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)