Skip to main content

Institutionalized Social Action: Control at the Program Level

  • Chapter
Purpose, Meaning, and Action

Abstract

In this chapter, we set out and illustrate the principle that institutionalized social action can be represented in cybernetic terms as systems of if-then rules that generate coordinated social actions by multiple interacting persons. We explain how this approach draws upon both sociology and cognitive science, and how it relates to the control hierarchy developed by Powers (1973).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, Andrew. 1995. “Sequence Analysis.” Annual Review of Sociology 21: 93–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abell, Peter. 1987. The Syntax of Social Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, John R. 1993. Rules of the Mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axten, Nick, and Thomas J. Fararo. 1977. “The Information Processing Representation of Institutionalized Social Action,” pp. 35–77 in Mathematical Models of Sociology, edited by P. Krishnan. Keele, UK: Sociological Review Monograph 24. Reprinted in 1979: Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axten, Nick, and John Skvoretz. 1980. “Roles and Role-Programs.” Quality and Quantity 14: 547–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bainbridge, William Sims, Edward E. Brent, Kathleen M. Carley, David R. Heise, Michael W. Macy, Barry Markovsky, and John Skvoretz. 1984. “Artificial Social Intelligence.” Annual Review of Sociology 20: 407–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balzer, Wolfgang. 1990. “A Basic Model of Social Institutions.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 16: 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Peter, and Thomas Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul J., and Walter W. Powell. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48: 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Emile. 1982 (1912). The Rules of Sociological Method. New York: Free Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Elster, Jon. 1989. The Cement of Society: A Study of Social Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fararo, Thomas J. 1989. The Meaning of General Theoretical Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fararo, Thomas J. 2001. Social Action Systems: Toundations and Synthesis in Sociological Theory. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fararo, Thomas J., and Carter T. Butts. 1999. “Advances in Generative Structuralism: Structured Agency and Multilevel Dynamics.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 24: 1–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fararo, Thomas J., and John Skvoretz. 1984. “Institutions as Production Systems.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 10:117–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fararo, Thomas J., and John Skvoretz. 1986. “Action and Institution, Network and Function: The Cybernetic Concept of Social Structure.” Sociological Forum 1: 219–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction Ritual. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heise, David. 1979. Understanding Events: Affect and the Construction of Social Action. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heise, David. 1989. “Modeling Event Structures.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 14: 139–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heise, David, and Alex Durig. 1992. “Qualitative Models,” pp. 1582–1586 in Encyclopedia of Sociology, edited by Edgar F. Borgatta and Marie L. Borgatta. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heise, David, and Alex Durig. 1997. “A Frame for Organizational Actions and Macroactions.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 22: 95–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heritage, John. 1984. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, Arlie Russell. 1979. “Emotion Work, Feeling Rules and Social Structure.” American Journal of Sociology 85: 551–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jepperson, Ronald L. 1991. “Institutions, Institutional Effects, and Institutionalism,” chapter 6 in The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by Walter W Powell and Paul J. DiMaggio. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jepperson, Ronald L. 2002. “The Development and Application of Sociological Neoinstitutionalism,” chapter 9 in New Directions in Contemporary Sociological Theory, edited by Joseph Berger and Morris Zelditch, Jr. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemper, Theodore D., ed. 1990. Research Agendas in the Sociology of Emotions. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, Kent. 1994. “Perceptual Control and Social Power.” Sociological Perspectives 37: 461–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, Kent. 1996. “The Collective Control of Perceptions: Toward a Person-Centered Sociology.” Paper presented at the 1996 Annual Meeting of the Control Systems Group. Flagstaff, AZ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, George A., Eugene Galanter, and Karl Pribram. 1960. Plans and the Structure of Behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, Alan, and Herbert A. Simon. 1972. Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Talcott. 1937. The Structure of Social Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Talcott. 1951. The Social System. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Talcott. 1961. “Afterword” in The Social Theories of Talcott Parsons: A Critical Examination, edited by Max Black. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, William T. 1973. Behavior: The Control of Perception. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, William T. 1979. “The Nature of Robots: Part 1. Defining Behavior.” Byte 4(June): 132–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, Richard J., and William T. Powers, eds. 1990. Introduction to Modern Psychology: The Control-Theory View. Gravel Switch, KT: Control Systems Group, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, William H. 1992. “A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency and Transformation.” American Journal of Sociology 98: 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skvoretz, John. 1984. “Languages and Grammars of Action and Interaction: Some Further Results.” Behavioral Science 29: 281–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skvoretz, John, and Thomas J. Fararo. 1980. “Languages and Grammars of Action and Interaction: A Contribution to the Formal Theory of Action.” Behavioral Science 25: 9–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skvoretz, John, and Thomas J. Fararo. 1989. “Action Structures and Sociological Action Theory.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 14: 111–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skvoretz, John, and Thomas J. Fararo. 1995. “The Evolution of Systems of Social Interaction,” pp. 275–299 in Current Perspectives in Social Theory, Vol. 15, edited by Ben Agger. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skvoretz, John, and Thomas J. Fararo. 1996. “Generating Symbolic Interaction: Production System Models.” Sociological Methods and Research 25: 60–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skvoretz, John, Thomas J. Fararo, and Nick Axten. 1980. “Role-Programme Models and the Analysis of Institutional Structures.” Sociology 101: 1366–1414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, Stephen. 1953. The Philosophy of Science. London: Hutchison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, Norbert. 1948. Cybernetics. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, H. Peyton. 1998. Individual Strategy and Social Structure: An Evolutionary Theory of Institutions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Kent A. McClelland Thomas J. Fararo

Copyright information

© 2006 Kent A. McClelland and Thomas J. Fararo

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fararo, T.J., Skvoretz, J. (2006). Institutionalized Social Action: Control at the Program Level. In: McClelland, K.A., Fararo, T.J. (eds) Purpose, Meaning, and Action. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-10809-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics