Skip to main content

Analyzing Discourse for Cultural Complexity

  • Chapter
Finding Culture in Talk

Part of the book series: Culture, Mind and Society ((CMAS))

Abstract

There is no one right way to perform a cultural analysis of interviews and other discourse. What you choose to look at depends on your research questions. My research questions have been, “What political-economic ideologies and cultural understandings are powerful for people in the United States?” and “How do people internalize public culture, especially conflicting sets of cultural messages?” I have used a mixture of methods— some already existing, others that I made up—to answer these questions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abelson, Robert R 1968. Computers, polls, and public opinion—some puzzles and paradoxes. Transaction 5(9):20–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, Alan. 1999. Memory. In The MIT encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences, ed. Robert A. Wilson and Frank C. Keil, pp. 514–517. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1981. Discourse in the novel. In The dialogic imagination, ed. Michael Holquist, pp. 259–422. Trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Gary. 1976. The economic approach to human behavior. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellah, Robert N., Richard Madsen, William M. Sullivan, Ann Swidler, and Steven M. Tipton. 1985. Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a theory of practice. Trans. Richard Nice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press [Orig. publ. 1972].

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, David. 2003. Huah. (Review of David Lipsky, Absolutely American: four years at west point). The New York Times Book Review, July 13, 2003:9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cammisa, Anne Marie. 1998. From rhetoric to reform? Welfare policy in American politics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chafe, Wallace. 1977. Creativity in verbalization and its implications for the nature of stored knowledge. In Discourse production and comprehension, ed. Roy O. Freedle, pp. 41–55. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Andrade, Roy G. and Claudia Strauss, eds. 1992. Human motives and cultural models. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijk, Teun A. van. 1987. Communicating racism: Ethnic prejudice in thought and talk. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenreich, Barbara. 2000. Class ceiling. Independent, January 5–11, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and social change. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1972. The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. Trans. A. M. Sheridan Smith. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Syntax and semantics, ed. Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, pp. 41–58. Vol. 3. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, Michael A. K. 1976. Modality and modulation in English. In Halliday: System and function in language, ed. G. R. Kress, pp. 189–213. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, Jane. 1995. The voices of Don Gabriel. In The dialogic emergence of culture, ed. Bruce Mannheim and Dennis Tedlock, pp. 96–147. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, Robert and Gunther Kress. 1988. Social semiotics. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, Dorothy and Naomi Quinn, eds. 1987. Cultural models in language and thought. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, Edwin. 1980. Culture and inference: A Trobriand case study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kristeva, Julia. 1986. Word, dialogue and novel. In The Kristeva reader, ed. Toril Moi, pp. 34–61. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusserow, Adrie. American individualisms: Child rearing and social class in three neighborhoods. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linde, Charlotte. 1987. Explanatory systems in oral life stories. In Cultural models in language and thought, ed. Dorothy Holland and Naomi Quinn. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linde, Charlotte. 1993. Life stories: The creation of coherence. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Vol. 2. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Macaulay, Ronald. 1991. Locating dialect in discourse: The language of honest men and bonnie lasses in Ayr. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macaulay, Ronald. 2002. You know, it depends. Journal of Pragmatics 34(6):749–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mead, Lawrence. 1986. Beyond entitlement: The social obligations of citizenship. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, Kaiping and Nisbett, Richard. 1999. Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. American Psychologist 54:741–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perelman, Chaim and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. Trans. John Wilkinson and Purcell Weaver. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, Naomi. 1996. Culture and contradiction: the case of Americans reasoning about marriage. Ethos 24:391–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiffrin, Deborah. 1985. Everyday argument: The organization of diversity in talk. In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. T. Van Dijk, pp. 35–46. Vol. 3. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse markers. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schram, Sanford. 1995. Words of welfare: The poverty of social science and the social science of poverty. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, Paul. 1993. Language, ideology, and point of view. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, Milton. 1972. When a great tradition modernizes: An anthropological approach to Indian civilization. London: Pall Mall Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, Claudia. 1990. Who gets ahead? Cognitive responses to heteroglossia in American political culture. American Ethnologist 17:312–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, Claudia. 1992. What makes Tony run? Schemas as motives reconsidered. In Human motives and cultural models, ed. Roy D’Andrade and Claudia Strauss, pp. 197–224. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, Claudia. 1997. Research on cultural discontinuities. In A cognitive theory of cultural meaning, ed. C. Strauss and N. Quinn, pp. 210–251. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, Claudia. 2000. The culture concept and the individualism-collectivism debate: dominant and alternative attributions for class in the United States. In Culture, thought, and development, ed. Larry Nucci, Geoffrey B. Saxe, Elliot Turiel, pp. 85–114. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, Claudia. 2002. Not-so rugged individualists: U.S. Americans’ conflicting ideas about poverty. In Work, welfare, and politics: Confronting poverty in the wake of welfare reform, ed. Frances Fox Piven, Joan Acker, Margaret Hallock, and Sandra Morgan. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, Claudia. 2004. Cultural standing in expression of opinion. Language in Society 33:161–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, Claudia. n.d. Blaming for Columbine: cultural models of agency in the United States (available from author).

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, Claudia and Naomi Quinn. 1997. A cognitive theory of cultural meaning. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teles, Steven M. 1998. Whose welfare? AFDC and elite politics. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Robert S. 1990. Staying the course: The emotional and social lives of men who do well at work. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicka, Anna. 1994. “Cultural scripts”: A new approach to the study of cross-cultural communication. In Language contact and language conflict, ed. Martin Pütz, pp. 69–87. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Raymond. 1977. Marxism and literature. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamada, Haru. 1997. Different games, different rules: Why Americans and Japanese misunderstand each other. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Naomi Quinn

Copyright information

© 2005 Naomi Quinn

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Strauss, C. (2005). Analyzing Discourse for Cultural Complexity. In: Quinn, N. (eds) Finding Culture in Talk. Culture, Mind and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-05871-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics