Abstract
Hundreds of epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) have been performed, successfully identifying replicated epigenomic signals in processes such as aging and smoking. Despite this progress, it remains a major challenge in EWAS to detect both cell type-specific and cell type confounding effects impacting study results. One way to identify these effects is through eFORGE (experimentally derived Functional element Overlap analysis of ReGions from EWAS), a published tool that uses 815 datasets from large-scale mapping studies to detect enriched tissues, cell types, and genomic regions. Here, I show that eFORGE analysis can be extended to EWAS differentially variable positions (DVPs), identifying target cell types and tissues. In addition, I also show that eFORGE tissue-specific enrichment can be detected for sites below EWAS significance threshold. I develop on these and other analysis examples, extending our knowledge of eFORGE cell type- and tissue-specific enrichment results for different EWAS.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Visscher PM, Wray NR, Zhang Q et al (2017) 10 years of GWAS discovery: biology, function, and translation. Am J Hum Genet 101:5–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.06.005
Maurano MT, Humbert R, Rynes E et al (2012) Systematic localization of common disease-associated variation in regulatory DNA. Science 337:1190–1195. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1222794
ENCODE Project Consortium (2012) An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 489:57–74. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11247
Roadmap Epigenomics Consortium, Kundaje A, Meuleman W et al (2015) Integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes. Nature 518:317–330. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14248
Stunnenberg HG, Abrignani S, Adams D et al (2016) The International Human Epigenome Consortium: a blueprint for scientific collaboration and discovery. Cell 167:1145–1149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.007
Claussnitzer M, Dankel SN, Kim K-H et al (2015) FTO obesity variant circuitry and adipocyte browning in humans. N Engl J Med 373:895–907. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1502214
Dunham I, Kulesha E, Iotchkova V et al (2014) FORGE: a tool to discover cell specific enrichments of GWAS associated SNPs in regulatory regions. bioRxiv:013045. https://doi.org/10.1101/013045
Breeze CE, Paul DS, van Dongen J et al (2016) eFORGE: a tool for identifying cell type-specific signal in epigenomic data. Cell Rep 17:2137–2150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2016.10.059
Eckhardt F, Lewin J, Cortese R et al (2006) DNA methylation profiling of human chromosomes 6, 20 and 22. Nat Genet 38:1378–1385. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1909
Benjamini Y, Yekutieli D (2001) The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Ann Stat 29:1165–1188. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1013699998
Liu Y, Aryee MJ, Padyukov L et al (2013) Epigenome-wide association data implicate DNA methylation as an intermediary of genetic risk in rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Biotechnol 31:142–147. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2487
Lowe R, Rakyan VK (2014) Correcting for cell-type composition bias in epigenome-wide association studies. Genome Med 6:23. https://doi.org/10.1186/gm540
Tsai P-C, Glastonbury CA, Eliot MN et al (2018) Smoking induces coordinated DNA methylation and gene expression changes in adipose tissue with consequences for metabolic health. Clin Epigenetics 10:126. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-018-0558-0
Teschendorff AE, Menon U, Gentry-Maharaj A et al (2009) An epigenetic signature in peripheral blood predicts active ovarian cancer. PLoS One 4:e8274. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008274
Phipson B, Maksimovic J, Oshlack A (2016) missMethyl: an R package for analyzing data from Illumina’s HumanMethylation450 platform. Bioinformatics 32:286–288. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv560
Ecker S, Chen L, Pancaldi V et al (2017) Genome-wide analysis of differential transcriptional and epigenetic variability across human immune cell types. Genome Biol 18(1):18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-017-1156-8
Wang X, Tucker NR, Rizki G et al (2016) Discovery and validation of sub-threshold genome-wide association study loci using epigenomic signatures. eLife 5:e10557. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10557
Teixeira VH, Pipinikas CP, Pennycuick A et al (2019) Deciphering the genomic, epigenomic, and transcriptomic landscapes of pre-invasive lung cancer lesions. Nat Med 25(3):517–525. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0323-0
van Dongen J, Nivard MG, Willemsen G et al (2016) Genetic and environmental influences interact with age and sex in shaping the human methylome. Nat Commun 7:11115. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11115
Altorok N, Coit P, Hughes T et al (2014) Genome-wide DNA methylation patterns in naive CD4+ T cells from patients with primary Sjögren’s syndrome. Arthritis Rheumatol 66:731–739. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.38264
Breeze CE, Reynolds AP, van Dongen J et al (2019) eFORGE v2.0: updated analysis of cell type-specific signal in epigenomic data. Bioinformatics 35(22):4767–4769. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz456
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Breeze, C.E. (2022). Cell Type-Specific Signal Analysis in Epigenome-Wide Association Studies. In: Guan, W. (eds) Epigenome-Wide Association Studies. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2432. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1994-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1994-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-1993-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-1994-0
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols