Skip to main content

Cecal Ligation and Puncture

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Sepsis

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 2321))

Abstract

Cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) is referred to as the “gold standard” rodent model for abdominal sepsis. CLP creates a continuously leaking, polymicrobial infectious focus in the abdomen. The abdominal cavity is opened under general anesthesia and analgesia and the cecum is exposed, ligated underneath the ileocecal valve, and punctured with a needle. A small amount of feces is pressed out through the puncture and the cecum is repositioned into the abdomen, which is then closed with single button sutures and tissue glue. CLP severity can be influenced via the length of the ligated cecum as well as the needle size. Within 24 h, animals develop clinical signs of a systemic bacterial infection. Analgesia, wide range antibiotic treatment, and fluid resuscitation should be administered during the acute phase of sepsis to increase the clinical relevance of the CLP model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fleischmann C, Scherag A, Adhikari NK et al (2016) Assessment of global incidence and mortality of hospital-treated sepsis. Current estimates and limitations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 193:259–272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Coopersmith CM, De Backer D, Deutschman CS et al (2018) Surviving sepsis campaign: research priorities for sepsis and septic shock. Intensive Care Med 44:1400–1426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen X, Zhu W, Tan J et al (2017) Early outcome of early-goal directed therapy for patients with sepsis or septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Oncotarget 8:27510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang L, Zhu G, Han L et al (2015) Early goal-directed therapy in the management of severe sepsis or septic shock in adults: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Med 13:71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mayr FB, Yende S, Angus DC (2014) Epidemiology of severe sepsis. Virulence 5:4–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Angus DC, Van der Poll T (2013) Severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 369:840–851

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Alverdy J, Hyoju S, Weigerinck M et al (2017) The gut microbiome and the mechanism of surgical infection. Br J Surg 104:e14–e23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Taeb AM, Hooper MH, Marik PE (2017) Sepsis: current definition, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. Nutr Clin Pract 32:296–308

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dejager L, Pinheiro I, Dejonckheere E et al (2011) Cecal ligation and puncture: the gold standard model for polymicrobial sepsis? Trends Microbiol 19:198–208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wichterman KA, Baue AE, Chaudry IH (1980) Sepsis and septic shock—a review of laboratory models and a proposal. J Surg Res 29:189–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ryan NT, Blackburn GL, Clowes GH Jr (1974) Differential tissue sensitivity to elevated endogenous insulin levels during experimental peritonitis in rats. Metabolism 23:1081–1089

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zolfaghari PS, Pinto BB, Dyson A et al (2013) The metabolic phenotype of rodent sepsis: cause for concern? Intensive Care Med Exp 1:6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Singleton K, Wischmeyer P (2003) Distance of cecum ligated influences mortality, tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-6 expression following cecal ligation and puncture in the rat. Eur Surg Res 35:486–491

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rittirsch D, Huber-Lang MS, Flierl MA et al (2009) Immunodesign of experimental sepsis by cecal ligation and puncture. Nat Protoc 4:31–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kieslichova E, Rocen M, Merta D et al (2013) The effect of immunosuppression on manifestations of sepsis in an animal model of cecal ligation and puncture. Transplant Proc 45(2):770–777

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Stahl TJ, Alden PB, Ring WS et al (1990) Sepsis-induced diastolic dysfunction in chronic canine peritonitis. Am J Phys Heart Circ Phys 258:H625–H633

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zingarelli B, Coopersmith CM, Drechsler S et al (2019) Part I: minimum quality threshold in preclinical sepsis studies (MQTiPSS) for study design and humane modeling endpoints. Shock 51:10–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Libert C, Ayala A, Bauer M et al (2019) Part II: minimum quality threshold in pre-clinical sepsis studies (MQTiPSS) for types of infections and organ dysfunction endpoints. Shock 51:23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hellman J, Bahrami S, Boros M et al (2019) Part III: minimum quality threshold in preclinical sepsis studies (MQTiPSS) for fluid resuscitation and antimicrobial therapy endpoints. Shock 51:33–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. de Melo CD, de Oliveira Lopes LK, Hu H et al (2017) Alcohol fixation of bacteria to surgical instruments increases cleaning difficulty and may contribute to sterilization inefficacy. Am J Infect Control 45:e81–e86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Iskander KN, Vaickus M, Duffy ER et al (2016) Shorter duration of post-operative antibiotics for Cecal ligation and puncture does not increase inflammation or mortality. PLoS One 11:e0163005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Huet O, Ramsey D, Miljavec S et al (2013) Ensuring animal welfare while meeting scientific aims using a murine pneumonia model of septic shock. Shock 39:488–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shrum B, Anantha RV, Xu SX et al (2014) A robust scoring system to evaluate sepsis severity in an animal model. BMC Res Notes 7:233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nemzek JA, Hugunin KM, Opp MR (2008) Modeling sepsis in the laboratory: merging sound science with animal well-being. Comp Med 58:120–128

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcin Osuchowski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this protocol

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this protocol

Drechsler, S., Osuchowski, M. (2021). Cecal Ligation and Puncture. In: Walker, W.E. (eds) Sepsis. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2321. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1488-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1488-4_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-1487-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-1488-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics