Abstract
Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are systematically developed statements to assist practitioners and patient to reach appropriate health-care decisions. The synthesis and translation of a large amount of evidence into practice recommendations should ultimately reduce the use of unnecessary or harmful interventions, help patients to achieve maximum benefit, and minimize risk, all at an acceptable cost.
In the past, CPGs were developed based on expert opinion, and using consensus methodology either formally or informally. Over the last 30 years, the evolution of increasingly transparent and robust methodology has led to more “evidence-based” recommendations. Clinical practice guidelines should be developed within the principles of bias minimization, systematic evidence retrieval and review, and a focus on patient relevant outcomes. Multiple nationally based and international groups now have published specific guidance for the development, dissemination, and evaluation of CPG.
This chapter describes the key principles of CPG development, including the importance of updating, disseminating, and evaluating the impact of CPG , and attempts to differentiate CPG intended for populations of patients from “evidence-based decision making” for individual patients, recognizing that the fundamental principles are the same.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Institute of Medicine (US) Committee to Advise the Public Health Service on Clinical Practice Guidelines (1990) Clinical practice guidelines: directions for a new program. National Academies Press, Washington, DC; [cited 2019 Dec 25]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK235751/
Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines (2011) Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. National Academies Press, Washington, DC; [cited 2019 Dec 18]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK209539/
Kredo T, Bernhardsson S, Machingaidze S et al (2016) Guide to clinical practice guidelines: the current state of play. Int J Qual Health Care 28:122–128
Uhlig K, Balk EM, Lau J (2008) Grading evidence-based guidelines—what are the issues? Am Kid J Dis 52:211–215
Grilli R, Magrini N, Penna A, Mura G, Liberati A (2000) Practice guidelines developed by specialty societies: the need for a critical appraisal. Lancet 355:103–106
Shaneyfelt TM, Mayo-Smith MF, Rothwangl J (1999) Are guidelines following guidelines? The methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines in the peer-reviewed medical literature. J Am Med Assoc 281:1900–1905
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, Harbour RT, Forsyth L (2008) SIGN 50: a guideline developer’s handbook. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, Edinburgh; [cited 2019 Dec 19]. http://www.sign.ac.uk/pdf/sign50.pdf
Gurevitch J, Koricheva J, Nakagawa S, Stewart G (2018) Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis. Nature 555:175–182
Rethlefsen ML, Farrell AM, Osterhaus LC et al (2019) A 24-step guide on how to design, conduct, and successfully publish a systematic review and meta-analysis in medical research. Eur J Epidem 68:617–626
Quigley JM, Thompson JC, Halfpenny NJ, Scott DA (2019) Critical appraisal of nonrandomized studies—a review of recommended and commonly used tools. J Eval Clin Pract 25:44–52
Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Brit Med J 327:557–560
Culleton B (2015) Evidence-based decision-making 4: development and limitations of clinical practice guidelines. In: Parfrey PS, Barrett BJ (eds) Clinical epidemiology: practice and methods. Springer, New York, NY, pp 443–453; [cited 2019 Dec 18]. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2428-8_26
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE et al (2008) GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Brit Med J 336:924–926
Sawaya GF, Guirguis-Blake J, LeFevre M, Harris R, Petitti D, for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2007) Update on the methods of the U.S. preventive services task force: estimating certainty and magnitude of net benefit. Ann Intern Med 147:871–875
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Schünemann HJ, Tugwell P, Knottnerus A (2011) GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the journal of clinical epidemiology. J Clin Epidem 64:380–382
Moorthi RN, Moe SM, Drüeke T, Uhlig K (2010) All research does not a guideline make! Am J Kid Dis 55:631–634
Lee DH, Vielemeyer O (2011) Analysis of overall level of evidence behind Infectious Diseases Society of America practice guidelines. Arch Intern Med 171:18–22
Vernooij RWM, García LM, Florez ID et al (2017) Updated clinical guidelines experience major reporting limitations. Implement Sci 12:120. [cited 2019 Dec 25] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5639761/
Brouwers MC, Makarski J, Kastner M, Hayden L, Bhattacharyya O, the GUIDE-M Research Team (2015) The Guideline Implementability Decision Excellence Model (GUIDE-M): a mixed methods approach to create an international resource to advance the practice guideline field. Implement Sci 10:36
Group E-BMW (1992) Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. J Am Med Assoc 268(17):2420–2425
Qaseem A, Forland F, Macbeth F et al (2012) Guidelines International Network: toward international standards for clinical practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med 156:525–531
GRADE handbook. [cited 2019 Dec 19]. https://gdt.gradepro.org/app/handbook/handbook.html#h.fueh5iz0cor4
Grading Guide. UpToDate. [cited 2019 Dec 19]. https://www.uptodate.com/home/grading-guide
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Yi, T.W., Donnellan, S., Levin, A. (2021). Evidence-Based Decision Making 4: Clinical Practice Guidelines. In: Parfrey, P.S., Barrett, B.J. (eds) Clinical Epidemiology. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2249. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1138-8_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1138-8_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-1137-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-1138-8
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols