Skip to main content

Abstract

All countries conduct international trade, their governments choose international trade policies, and general theories explain the sources of comparative advantage that underlie the gains from freer international trade, while theories of endogenous policy explain trade-policy decisions. The theories encompass in their generality those countries that have a socialist past and have only in the 1990s embarked on the path to private-property market economies. Are there, however, required modifications, or special aspects of the general theories that merit stressing in application to the transition economies?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baldwin, Richard. (1994). Towards an Integrated Europe. London: Centre for Policy Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, Richard. (1997). “Comment on Gros and Gonciarz (A note on the trade potential of Central and Eastern Europe).” European Journal of Political Economy, 13: 187–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati, Jagdish N., Richard A. Brecher, Elias Dinopoulo, and T.N. Srinivasan. (1987). “Quid Pro Quo Foreign Investment and Welfare: A Political-Economy-Theoretic Model.” Journal of Development Economics, 27: 127–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogetić, Željko, and Arye L. Hillman (eds.). (1995). Financing Government in Transition, Bulgaria: The Political Economy of Tax Policies, Tax Bases, and Tax Evasion. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Stuart, and Misha Belkindas. (1993). “Whose Feeding Whom? An Analysis of Soviet Interrepublic Trade.” In Former Soviet Union in Transition, Joint Economic Committee, U.S. Congress. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassing, James. (1996). “Protectionist Mutual Funds.” European Journal of Political Economy, 12: 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelb, Alan, Arye L. Hillman, and Heinrich W. Ursprung. (1997). “Rents as Distractions: Why the Exit from Transition Is Prolonged.” In Nicolas Baltas, George Demopoulos, and Joseph Hassid (eds.), Economic Interdependence and Cooperation in Europe. Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gros, Daniel, and Andrzej Gonciarz. (1996). “A Note on the Trade Potential of Central and Eastern Europe.” European Journal of Political Economy, 12: 709–721; rejoinder European Journal of Political Economy (1997), 13: 195–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, Arye L. (1991). “Liberalization Dilemmas.” In Arye L. Hillman (ed.), Markets and Politicians: Politicized Economic Choice. Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, Arye L. (1994a). The Political Economy of Protection (2nd ed.). New York: Harwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, Arye L. (1994b). “The Transition from Socialism: An Overview from a Political-Economy Perspective.” European Journal of Political Economy, 10: 191–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, Arye L., and Adi Schnytzer. (1992). “Creating the Reform-Resistant Dependent Economy: Socialist Comparative Advantage, Enterprise Restructuring, and the CMEA.” In Arye L. Hillman and Branko Milanovic (eds.), The Transition from Socialism in Eastern Europe: Domestic Restructuring and Foreign Trade. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, Arye L., and Heinrich Ursprung. (1988). “Domestic Politics, Foreign Interests and International Trade Policy.” American Economic Review, 78: 729–745. Reprinted in J. Peter Neary (ed.), (1996), International Library of Critical Writings in Economics: International Trade. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, Arye L., and Heinrich Ursprung. (1993). “The Multinational Firm, Political Competition, and International Trade Policy.” International Economic Review, 34: 347–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, Arye L., and Heinrich Ursprung. (1996). “The Political Economy of Trade Liberalization in the Transition.” European Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Congress of the European Economic Association, 40: 783–794.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellman, Mitchell. (1997). “Comment on Gros and Gonciarz (A note on the trade potential of Central and Eastern Europe).” European Journal of Political Economy, 13: 189–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marrese, Michael, and Jan Vanous. (1983). Soviet Subsidization of CMEA Trade with Eastern Europe. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalopoulos, Costantine, and David Tarr. (1994). Trade in the New Independent States. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, Douglass. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potters, Jan, Randolh Sloof, and Frans van Winden. (1997). “Campaign Expenditures, Contributions, and Direct Endorsements: The Strategic Use of Information and Money to Influence Voter Behavior.” European Journal of Political Economy, 13: 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, Dani. (1995). “Political Economy of Trade Policy.” In Gene Grossman and Kenneth Rogoff (eds.), Handbook of International Economics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrenk, Martin. (1992). “The CMEA System of Trade and Payments.” In Arye L. Hillman and Branko Milanovic (eds.), The Transition from Socialism in Eastern Europe: Domestic Restructuring and Foreign Trade. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siebert, Horst. (1993). “The Big Bang with the Big Brother: German Unification in Its Third Year.” Discussion paper 211, Kiel Institute für Weltwirtshaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarr, David. (1992). “Problems in the Transition from the CMEA: Implications for Eastern Europe.” Communist Economies and Economic Transformation, 4: 23–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarr, David. (1994). “The Terms of Trade Effects of Moving to World Prices on Countries of the Former Soviet Union.” Journal of Comparative Economics, 18: 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winters, Alan, and Zhen Kun Wang. (1994). Eastern Europe’s International Trade. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Mario I. Blejer Marko Škreb

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hillman, A.L., Ursprung, H. (1999). What is Special about Endogenous International Trade Policy in Transition Economies?. In: Blejer, M.I., Škreb, M. (eds) Balance of Payments, Exchange Rates, and Competitiveness in Transition Economies. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-31346-7_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-31346-7_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-8422-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-585-31346-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics