Skip to main content

Argumentation in Higher Education: Examples of Actual Practices with Argumentation Tools

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Argumentation and Education

Abstract

This practice oriented chapter presents one case of using interactive media for supporting collaborative argumentation by university students. The discussion is descriptive, focusing on the scenario and the tools that are used, and on examples of actual discussion by students. Some basic mechanisms of employing argumentation are illustrated, by students using computer tools (chat, forums, graphical tools) for producing an argumentative essay. The chapter shows some of the characteristic constraints that are involved in implementing argumentative learning in university practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    1 http://edugate.fss.uu.nl/∼crocicl/index.html

  2. 2.

    2 http://scale.emse.fr/pws/

References

  • Andriessen, J. (2006). Arguing to Learn. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Handbook of the Learning sciences (pp. 443–460). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andriessen, J., Baker, M., Suthers, D. (2003). Argumentation, computer support, and the educational context of confronting cognitions. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker, D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to learn: confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments (pp. 1–25). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andriessen, J., Baker, M., van der Puil, C. (in press). Socio-cognitive tension in collaborative working relations. In: S. Ludvigsen, A. Lund, I. Rasmussen, R. Saljo (Eds.), Learning across sites: new tools, infrastructures, and practices. London: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M., Andriessen, J., Lund, K., van Amelsvoort, M., Quignard, M. (2007). Rainbow: a framework for analysing computer-mediated pedagogical debates. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2, 315–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M.H.T., and Van Lehn, K.A. (1991). The Content of Physics Self-Explanations Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol. 1, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Amelsvoort, M. (2006). A space for debate: How diagrams support collaborative argumentation-based learning. Enschede: Print Partners Ipskamp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jerry E. B. Andriessen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Andriessen, J.E.B. (2009). Argumentation in Higher Education: Examples of Actual Practices with Argumentation Tools. In: Muller Mirza, N., Perret-Clermont, AN. (eds) Argumentation and Education. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98125-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics