Skip to main content

Recent Perspectives on the Regression Discontinuity Design

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Quantitative Criminology

Abstract

The regression discontinuity design was originally proposed in 1960 as a powerful alternative to randomized experiments. It has been little used since. Over the past decade, however, the design has been increasingly and successfully employed by economists in a variety of studies. In this paper, the fundamentals of the regression-discontinuity are discussed. Recent advances are emphasized.

Even in these early formulations, the design was simple and powerful. However, there were few applications and apparently only four published studies with significant crime and justice content (Berk and Rauma 1983; Berk and de Leeuw 1999; Chen and Shapiro 2007; Berk et al. 2010). Over the past 15 years, a number of economists have extended the design (Imbens and Lemieux 2008b; Imbens and Kalyanaraman 2009) and applied it in a wide variety of settings (Imbens and Lemieux 2008a; Lee and Lemieux 2009). An account of how and why interest in the regression discontinuity design has varied over the years can be found in recent paper by Thomas Cook (Cook 2008).

In this chapter, the fundamentals of the regression discontinuity design are considered. Some recent advances are highlighted. The discussion begins with brief introduction to the ways in which statisticians think about causal inference. Then, the classic regression discontinuity design is examined. Newer material follows.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Sometimes the ratio rather than the difference is used, but that too is unobservable.

  2. 2.

    One can construct special cases in which the assumptions are violated, and there is no bias. But in practice, such scenarios would be extremely rare.

  3. 3.

    Fit quality was evaluated using the AIC, but the adjusted proportion of deviance accounted for by the model is reported for ease of exposition.

  4. 4.

    The treatment effect estimate is not exactly 10.0 because of random sampling error.

References

  • Berk RA (2008a) Statistical learning from a regression perspective. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Berk RA (2008b) Forecasting methods in crime and justice. In: Hagan J, Schepple KL, Tyler TR (eds) Annual review of law and social science. Annual reviews, Palo Alto

    Google Scholar 

  • Berk RA, de Leeuw J (1999) An evaluation of California’s inmate classification system using a generalized regression discontinuity design. J Am Stat Assoc 94(448):1045–1052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berk RA, Rauma D (1983) Capitalizing on nonrandom assignment to treatments: a regression discontinuity evaluation of a crime control program. J Am Stat Assoc 78(381):21–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berk RA, Brown L, Zhao L (2009) Statistical inference after model selection. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, forthcoming, University of Pennsylvania, Department of Statistics, Working Paper (under review)

    Google Scholar 

  • Berk RA, Barnes G, Ahlman L, Kurtz E (2010) When second best is good enough: a comparison between a true experiment and a regression discontinuity quasiexperiment. University of Pennsylvania, Department of Statistics. Working Paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman AW, Pope R, Ismail B (2004) Detecting discontinuities in nonparametric regression curves and surfaces. Stat Comput 16:377–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (2005) Microeconometrics: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DT, Stanley JC (1963) Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Houghton Miffin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen MK, Shapiro JM (2007) Do harsher prison conditions reduce recidivism? A discontinuity-based approach. Am Law Econ Rev 9(1):1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook TD (2008) ’Waiting for life to arrive:’ A history of the regression-discontinuity design in psychology, statistics, and economics. J Econom 142:636–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook RD, Weisberg S (1999) Applied regression analysis including computing and graphics. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fan J, Gijbels I (1996) Local polynomial regression modeling and its applications. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman DA (2008) Diagnostics cannot have much power against general alternatives. http://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~freedman/

  • Goldberger AS (1972) Selection bias in evaluating treatment effects: some formal illustrations. Madison, WI. Unpublished manuscript

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastie TJ, Tibshirani RJ (1990) Generalized additive models. Chapman and Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastie TJ, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2009) The elements of statistical learning, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holland P (1986) Statistics and causal inference. J Am Stat Assoc 8:945–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoenig JM, Heisey DM (2001) The abuse of power: the pervasive fallacy of power calculation for data analysis. Am Stat 55:19–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imbens G, Kalyanaraman K (2009) Optimal bandwidth choice for the regression discontinuity estimator. Harvard University, Department of Economics, Working Paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Imbens G, Lemieux T (2008a) Special issue editors’ introduction: The regression discontinuity design – theory and applications. J Econom 142:615–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imbens G, Lemieux T (2008b) Regression discontinuity designs: a guide to practice. J Econom 142:611–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee DS, Lemieux T (2009) Regression discontinuity designs in economics. National Bureau of Economic Research: working paper #14723

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeb H, Pötscher BM (2006) Can one estimate the conditional distribution of post-model-selection estimators? Ann Stat 34(5):2554–2591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neyman J (1923) Sur Les Applications de la Thorie des Probabilits aux Experiences Agricoles: Essai des Principes. Roczniki Nauk Rolniczych10:151. In Polish

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin D (1974) Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. J Educ Psychol 66:688–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thistlewaite DL, Campbell DT (1960) Regression-discontinuity analysis: an alternative to the ex-post facto design. J Educ Psychol 51:309–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trochim WMK (1984) Research design for program evaluation. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills

    Google Scholar 

  • Trochim WMK (2001) Regression discontinuity design. In: Smelser NJ, Bates PB (eds) International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences, vol 19. 12940–12945, Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Westfall PH, Young SS (1993) Resampling based multiple testing. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Work on this paper was funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation: SES-0437169, “Ensemble methods for Data Analysis in the Behavioral, Social and Economic Sciences.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Berk, R. (2010). Recent Perspectives on the Regression Discontinuity Design. In: Piquero, A., Weisburd, D. (eds) Handbook of Quantitative Criminology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77650-7_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics