Skip to main content

Regime Shifts and the Term Structure of Interest Rates

  • Chapter
Handbook of Quantitative Finance and Risk Management

Abstract

Since the seminal paper of Duffie and Kan (1996), most empirical research on the term structure of interest rates has focused on a class of linear models, generally referred to as “affine term structure models.” Since these models produce such a closed-form solution for the entire yield curve, they become very tractable in empirical applications. Nonlinearity can be introduced into dynamic models of the term structure of interest rates either by generalizing the affine specification to a quadratic form or by including a Poisson jump component as an additional state variable. In our paper, we survey some recent studies of dynamic models of the term structure of interest rates that incorporate Markov regimes shifts. We not only summarize an early literature of regime-switching models that mainly focus on the short-term interest rate, but also the recent studies considering regime-switching models in discrete-time and continuous-time, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 869.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    OAPEC is an abbreviation for Organization of Arab Petroleum Exporting Countries consisting of the Arab members of OPEC plus Egypt and Syria.

  2. 2.

    Engle (1982) shows that a possible cause of the leptokurtosis in the unconditional distribution is conditional heteroskedasticity.

  3. 3.

    See Chan et al. (1992) and Gray (1996) for more details.

  4. 4.

    Markov property argues that the process of s t depends on the past realizations only through s t − 1.

  5. 5.

    See Kim and Nelson (1999).

  6. 6.

    Garcia and Perron (1996) employs Hamilton’s (1989) regime-switching model to explicitly account for regime shifts in an autoregressive model with three-state regime-switching mean and variance.

  7. 7.

    For simplicity, the following analysis is based only on one industry. We thus omit the symbol i.

  8. 8.

    The following derivations are mainly from Shen (1994).

  9. 9.

    f(.) and p(.) denote the continuous and discrete density function, respectively.

  10. 10.

    In the case of stochastic volatility, affine models assume that the product of the market price of risk and the volatility term is a linear function of the state variable X t . In other words, it is assumed that, under the risk-neutral probability measure, X t follows a linear mean-reverting process

  11. 11.

    Of course, some regularity conditions need to be imposed on the parameters so that the term inside the square root is non-negative and the process is well defined. See Dai et al. (2006) for more details.

  12. 12.

    This is the approximation used in Bansal and Zhou (2002).

  13. 13.

    See Last and Brandt (1995) for detailed discussion on marked point process, stochastic intensity kernel, and related results.

References

  • Ahn, D.-H, R. F. Dittmar, and A. R. Gallant. 2002. “Quadratic term structure models: theory and evidence.” The Review of Financial Studies 15, 243–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahn, C and H. Thompson. 1988. “Jump diffusion processes and the term structure of interest rates.” Journal of Finance 43, 155–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ang, A. and G. Bekaert. 2002. “Regime switches in interest rates.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 20(2), 163–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, R. and H. Zhou. 2002. “Term structure of interest rates with regime shifts.” Journal of Finance 57, 1997–2043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekaert, G., R. J. Hodrick, and D. A. Marshall. 2001. “‘Peso problem’ explanations for term structure anomalies.” Journal of Monetary Economics 48(2), 241–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bielecki, T. and M. Rutkowski. 2000. “Multiple ratings model of defaultable term structure.” Mathematical Finance 10, 125–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bielecki, T. and M. Rutkowski. 2001. Modeling of the defaultable term structure: conditional Markov approach, Working paper, The Northeastern Illinois University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chacko, G. and S. Das. 2002. “Pricing interest rate derivatives: a general approach.” Review of Financial Studies 15, 195–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K. C., G. A. Karolyi, F. A. Longstaff, and A. B. Sanders. 1992. “An empirical comparison to alterative models of the short-term interest rate.” Journal of Finance 47, 1209–1227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cecchetti, S. J., P. Lam, and N. C. Mark. 1993. “The equity premium and the risk-free rate: matching the moments.” Journal of Monetary Economics 31, 21–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheridito, P., D. Filipovic, and R. Kimmel. 2007. “Market price of risk specifications for affine models: theory and evidence.” Journal of Financial Economics 83, 123–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, J., J. Ingersoll, and S. Ross. 1985a “An intertemporal general equilibrium model of asset prices.” Econometrica 53, 363–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, J., J. Ingersoll, and S. Ross. 1985b “A theory of the term structure of interest rates.” Econometrica 53, 385–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, S. 2002. “The surprise element: jumps in interest rates.” Journal of Econometrics 106, 27–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai, Q. and K. Singleton. 2000 “Specification analysis of affine term structure models.” Journal of Finance 55, 1943–1978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai, Q. and K. Singleton. 2003. “Term structure dynamics in theory and reality.” The Review of Financial Studies 16, 631–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai, Q., A. Le, and K. Singelton. 2006. Discrete-time dynamic term structure models with generalized market prices of risk, working paper, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai, Q., K. Singleton, and W. Yang. 2007. “Regime shifts in dynamic term structure model of the U.S. treasury bond yields.” Review of Financial Studies 20, 1669–1706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diebold, F. and G. Rudebusch. 1996. “Measuring business cycles: a modern perspective.” Review of Economics and Statistics 78, 67–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duiffie, G. 2002. “Term premia and interest rate forecasts in affine models.” Journal of Finance 57, 405–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffie, D. and R. Kan. 1996. “A yield-factor model of interest rates.” Mathematical Finance 6, 379–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffie, D., J. Pan, and K. Singleton. 2000 “Transform analysis and asset pricing for affine jump-diffusions.” Econometric 68, 1343–1376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, R. J. et al. 1995. Hidden Markov models: estimation and control, New York, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, R. J. and R. S. Mamon. 2001. “A complete yield curve descriptions of a Markov interest rate model.” International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance 6, 317–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. F. 1982. “Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity with estimates of the variance of U.K. inflation.” Econometrica 50, 987–1008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M. D. and K. Lewis. 1995. “Do expected shifts in in?ation affect estimates of the long-run fisher relation?” The Journal of Finance 50(1), 225–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, R. and P. Perron. 1996. “An analysis of the real interest rate under regime shifts” The Review of Economics and Statistics 78(1), 111–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, S. F. 1996. “Modeling the conditional distribution of interest rates as a regime-switching process.” Journal of Financial Economics 42, 27–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, J. D. 1988. “Rational-expectations econometric analysis of changes in regime: an investigation of the term structure of interest rates.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 12, 385–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, J. 1989. “A new approach to the economic analysis of nonstationary time series and the business cycle.” Econometrica 57, 357–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, J. D. 1994. Time series analysis, Princeton University Press, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, M. and D. Kreps. 1979. “Martingales and arbitrage in multiperiod security markets.” Journal of Economic Theory 20, 381–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, C. J. and C. Nelson. 1999. “A Bayesian approach to testing for Markov switching in univariate and dynamic factor models,” Discussion Papers in Economics at the University of Washington 0035, Department of Economics at the University of Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landen, C. 2000. “Bond pricing in a hidden Markov model of the short rate.” Finance and Stochastics 4, 371–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Last, G. and A. Brandt. 1995. Marked point processes on the real line, Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, K. 1991. “Was there a ‘Peso problem’ in the U.S. term structure of interest rates: 1979–1982?” International Economic Review 32(1), 159–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piazzesi, M. 2005. “Bond yields and the federal reserve.” Journal of Political Economy 113, 311–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, C. H. 1994. “Testing efficiency of the Taiwan–US forward exchange market – a Markov switching model.” Asian Economic Journal 8, 205–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sola, M. and J. Driffill. 1994. “Testing the term structure of interest rates using a vector autoregression with regime switching.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 18, 601–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, S. and Y. Zeng. 2004. “Affine regime-switching models for interest rate term structure,” in Mathematics of Finance, G. Yin and Q. Zhang (Eds). American Mathematical Society Series – Contemporary Mathematics, Vol. 351, pp. 375–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, S. and Y. Zeng. 2005. “A general equilibrium model of the term structure of interest rates under regime-switching risk.” International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance 8, 839–869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, S. and Y. Zeng. 2006. “The term structure of interest rates under regime shifts and jumps.” Economics Letters 93, 215–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, S. and Y. Zeng. 2007. “An exact solution of the term structure of interest rate under regime-switching risk.” in Hidden Markov models in finance, Mamon, R. S. and R. J. Elliott (Eds). International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, G. G. and Q. Zhang. 1998. Continuous-time Markov chains and applications. A singular perturbation approach, Springer, Berlin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chien-Chung Nieh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nieh, CC., Wu, S., Zeng, Y. (2010). Regime Shifts and the Term Structure of Interest Rates. In: Lee, CF., Lee, A.C., Lee, J. (eds) Handbook of Quantitative Finance and Risk Management. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77117-5_72

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics