Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Multiobjective Optimization

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Introduction to Applied Optimization

Part of the book series: Springer Optimization and Its Applications ((SOIA,volume 22))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Benson H. P.(1991), Complete efficiency and the initialization of algorithms for multiple objective programming,Operational Research Letters,10(4), 481.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Birge J. R.(1997), Stochastic programming stochastic programming computation and applications,INFORMS Journal on Computing,9(2), 111.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Buchanan J. T.(1986), Multiple objective mathematical programmingmathematical programming: A review,New Zealand Operational Research,14(1), 1.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Carmichael D. G.(1981),Structural Modelingmodeling and Optimization, Ellis Horwood, Chichester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chankong V. and Y. Y. Haimes (1983a), Optimization-based methods for multiobjective decision-making: An overview,Large Scale Systems,5(1), 1.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Chankong V. and Y. Y. Haimes (1983b),Multiobjective decision making theory and methodology, Elsevier Science, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Chankong V., Y. Y. Haimes, J. Thadathil, and S. Zionts (1985), Multiple criteria optimization: A state of the art review inDecision Making with Multiple Objectives, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems 242, Edited by Y. Y. Haimes, V. Chankong, Springer-Verlag, New York, 36.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Charnes A. and W. Cooper (1961),Management Models and Industrial Application of Linear Programming, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cohon J. L. (1985), Multicriteria programming: Brief review and application, inDesign Optimization, J. S. Gero (ed.), Academic Press, 163.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cohon J. L.(1978),Multiobjective Programming and Planning, Academic Press, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Cohon J., G. Scavone, and R. Solanki (1988), Multicriterion optimization in resources planning inMulticriteria Optimization in Engineering and in the Sciences, W. Stadler (ed.), Plenum Press, New York, 117.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Das I. and J. E. Dennis (1998), Normal-boundary intersection: A new method for generating the Pareto Pareto surface surface in nonlinear multicriteria optimization problems,SIAM Journal on Optimization,8(3), 631.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Eschenauer H. A.(1988), Multicriteria optimization techniques for highly accurate focusing systems, inMulticriteria Optimization in Engineering and in the Sciences, W. Stadler (ed.), Plenum Press, New York, 309.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Evans G. W., An overview of techniques for solving multiobjective mathematical programs,Management Science,30(11), 1268.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fu Y. and U. Diwekar (2003), An efficient sampling approach to multiobjective optimization,Annals of Operations Research,132, 109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gass S. and T. Saaty (1955), The computational algorithm for the parametric objective function,Naval Research Logistics Quarterly,2, 39.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Gephart R. E. and R. E. Lundgren, (1995),Hanford tank clean up: A guide to understanding the technical issues, Report BNWL-645, Richland, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, WA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Gerber M. S.(1998),Historical generation of Hanford site wastes, Report WHC-SA-1224, Richland, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, WA.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Haimes Y. Y., L. S. Lasdon, and D. A. Wismer (1971), On a bicriterion formulation of the problems of integrated system identification and system optimization,IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics,1, 296.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Hopkins D. F., M. Hoza, and C. A. Lo Presti (1994),FY94 Optimal Waste Loading Models Development, Report prepared for U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-AC06-76RLO 1830.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hoza M.(1994), Multipurpose optimization models for high-level wastehigh-level waste vitrificationhazardous waste case study!vitrification,Proceedings of the International Topical Meeting on Nuclear and Hazardous Waste Management – SPECTRUM 94, La Grange Park, IL: American Nuclear Society, 1072–1077.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hrma P. R. and A. W. Bailey (1995),High level waste at Hanford: Potential for waste loading maximization, Report PNL-SA-26441, Richland, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, WA.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hwang C. L. and A. S. M. Masud (1979),Multiple objective decision making—methods and applications: A state-of-the-art survey,Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, 164, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jantzen C. M. and K. G. Brown (1993), Statistical process control of glass manufactured for nuclear waste disposal,American Ceramic Society Bulletin 72, 55.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Johnson T. and U. Diwekar (2001), Hanford nuclear waste disposal and the value of researchvalue of research,Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis,10, 87.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Johnson T. and U. Diwekar (1999), The value of design research: Stochastic optimization as a policy tool, inFoundations of Computer-Aided Design, AIChE Symposium Series, Vol. 96, Malone et al.(eds.) 454.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kacker R. S.(1985), Off-line quality control, parameter design, and the TaguchiTaguchi method,Journal of Quality Technology,17, 176.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kuhn H. W. and A. W. Tucker (1951), Nonlinear programmingnonlinear programming inProceedings of Second Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probabilityprobability, J. Neyman (ed.), University of California Press, Berkeley, 481.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kumar P., N. Singh, and N. K. Tewari (1991), A Nonlinear goal programminggoal programming model for multistage, multiobjective decision problems with application to grouping and loading problem in a flexible manufacturing system,European Journal of Operational Research,53(2), 166.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Lieberman E. R.(1991), Soviet multiobjective mathematical programmingmathematical programming methods: An overview,Management Science,37(9), 1147.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Mendel J. E., W. A. Rawest, R. P. Turcotte, and J. L. McElroy (1980), Physical properties of glass for immobilization of high-level radioactive waste,Nuclear and Chemical Waste Management,1, 17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Miettinen K. M.(1999),Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization, Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Narayan V., U. Diwekar, and M. Hoza (1996), Synthesizing optimal waste blends,Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research,35, 3519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ohkubo S., P. B. R. Dissanayake, and K. Taniwaki (1998), An approach to multicriteria fuzzy optimization of a prestressed concrete bridge system considering cost and aesthetic feeling,Structural Optimization,15(2), 132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Olson D. L.(1993), TchebycheffTchebycheff Norms in multiobjective linear programming,Mathematical and Computer Modeling,17(1), 113.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Osyczka A.(1984),Multicriterion Optimization in Engineering with FORTRAN programs, Ellis Horwood, London.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Painton L. A. and U. M. Diwekar (1995), Stochastic annealingstochastic annealing under uncertainty,European Journal of Operations Research,83, 489.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Pareto V.(1964),Cours d’Economie Politique, Libraire Droz, Gen\’eve.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Pareto V.(1971),Manual of Political Economy, MacMillan Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ravindran A., D. T. Phillips, and J. J. Solberg (1987),Operations Research: Principles and Practice, (Second Edition), John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Rosenthal R. E.(1985), Principles of multiobjective optimization,Decision Sciences,16(2), 133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Schulz W. W. and N. Lombado (Eds.) (1998), Science and technology for disposal of radioactive tank wastes, inProceedings of the American Chemical Society Symposium on Science and Technology for Disposal of Radioactive Tank Waste (1997: Las Vegas, Nevada). Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Schy A. A. and D. P. Giesy (1988), Multicriteria optimization methods for design of aircraft control systems, inMulticriteria Optimization in Engineering and in the Sciences, W. Stadler (ed.), Plenum Press, New York, 225.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Silverman J., R. E. Steuer, and A. W. Whisman (1988), A multi-period, multiple criteria optimization system for manpower planning,European Journal of Operational Research,34(2), 160.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  45. Sobol I. M.(1992), A global search for multicriterial problems, inMultiple Criteria Decision Making: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference, A. Goicoechea, L. Duckstein and S. Zionts (eds.), Springer-Verlag, New York, 401.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Sobol I. M. and R. B. Statnikov (1982),Nailuchshie Resheniyagde Ikh Iskat’ (The Best Decisions - Where to Seek Them), Mathematics/Cybernetics Series, No. 1, Znanie, Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Stadler W.(ed.) (1988),Multicriteria Optimization in Engineering and in the Sciences, Plenum Press, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. Starkey J. M., S. Gray, and D. Watts (1988), Vehicle performance simulation and optimization including tire slid,ASME 881733.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Steuer R. E.(1986),Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation, and Applications, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  50. Steuer R. E. and M. Sun (1995), The parameter space investigation method of multiple objective nonlinear programmingnonlinear programming: A computational investigation,Operations Research,43(4), 641.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  51. Stewart T. J.(1992), A critical survey on the status of multiple criteria decision making theory and practice,OMEGA,20(5–6), 569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Tamiz M. and D. D. Jones (1996), An overview of current solution methods and modelingmodeling practices in goal programminggoal programming, inMultiobjective Programming and goal programminggoal programming: Theories and Applications, M. Tamiz (ed.), Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems 432, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 198.

    Google Scholar 

  53. VanLaarhoven P. J. M. and E. H. Aarts (1987),Simulated Annealingsimulated annealing Theory and Applications, D. Reidel, Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Wood E., N. P. Greis, and R. E. Steuer (1982), Linear and nonlinear applications of the Tchebycheff metric to the multi criteria water allocation problem, inEnvironmental Systems Analysis and Management, S. Rinaldi (ed.), North-Holland, 363.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Yu P. L.(1985),Multiple-Criteria Decision Making Concepts, Techniques, and Extensions, Plenum Press, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. Zadeh L.(1963), Optimality and non-scalar-valued performance criteria,IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control,8, 59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Zeleny M.(1974),Linear multiobjective programming, in Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems 95, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Zeleny M.(1982),Multiple Criteria Decision Making, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  59. Zionts S.(1989), Multiple criteria mathematical programmingmathematical programming: An updated overview and several approaches, inMultiple Criteria Decision Making and Risk Analysis Using Microcomputers, B. KarpakKarpak, S. Zionts (eds.), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Illinois at Chicago, IL, USA

    Urmila Diwekar

Authors
  1. Urmila Diwekar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Diwekar, U. (2008). Multiobjective Optimization. In: Introduction to Applied Optimization. Springer Optimization and Its Applications(), vol 22. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-76635-5_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation