In large part, language comprehension and production occur quickly and unavailable to conscious reflection. Electrophysiological methods — eventrelated brain potentials (ERPs) and other measures of electrical brain activity — afford a view of the brain in action as it supports these language processes as they unfold in real time. Moreover, ERPs can be utilized even when a comprehender's only task is to understand a word, phrase or sentence or to produce names or more elaborate utterances. Recording electrical brain activity in response to written and spoken words (as well as smaller and larger linguistic units) thus provides a means of tracking the brain's sensitivity to various linguistic inputs, revealing which factors are important to processing and the time course of their influence. As a continuous measure of processing, ERPs allow simultaneous looks at brain activity at the multiple time scales at which language processing transpires, from the first milliseconds of processing a word to the seconds required to comprehend a sentence, or even longer for a discourse. One of the greatest advantages to using ERPs, then, is that this combination of methodological features allows for investigations of aspects of language processing that are otherwise difficult if not impossible to detect via other measures. In this chapter, we will examine such instances, outlining five very different groups of ERP studies which exemplify some of the unique insights made possible by use of the methodology in the study of language-related neural processes. In particular, we will discuss the paradigms and the kinds of information that can be gathered from using ERPs to look at language processing outside the focus of attention, during language learning (before explicit knowing), for individuals in unconscious states, in determining the nature of predictive processing, and for testing how specific contextual cues may activate information in semantic memory. Our examination of these specific experimental examples makes clear the important role that ERPs have to play in studying language processing, both traditionally and as the number of neuroimaging techniques continues to grow.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bastuji, H., Perrin F., & Garcia-Larrea, L. (2002). Semantic analysis of auditory input during sleep: Studies with event related potentials. International Journal of Psychophysiology Special Issue: Event-Related Potential Measures of Information Processing during Sleep, 46, 243-255.
Brualla, J., Romero, M. F., Serrano, M., & Valdizán, J. R. (1998). Auditory event-related potentials to semantic priming during sleep. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology: Evoked Potentials, 108, 283-290.
DeLong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas. M. (2005). Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1117-1121.
Federmeier, K. D., & M. Kutas. (1999). A rose by any other name: Long-term memory structure and sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 469-495.
Ferretti, T. R., Kutas, M., & McRae, K. (2007). Verb Aspect and the Activation of Event Knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 182-196.
Ibáñez, A., López V., & Cornejo, C. (2006). ERPs and contextual semantic discrimination: Degrees of congruence in wakefulness and sleep. Brain and Language, 98, 264-275.
Kamide, Y., Altmann, G. T. M., & Haywood, S. L. (2003). The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 133-156.
Kotchoubey, B. (2005). Apallic syndrome is not apallic: Is vegetative state vegetative? Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 15, 333-356.
Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 463-470.
Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203-205.
Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307, 161-163.
Kutas, M., K. D. Federmeier, J. Staab, and R. Kluender. (In press). Language. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. Tassinary, & G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of Psychophysiology, 3rd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McCarthy, G., & Nobre, A. C. (1993). Modulation of semantic processing by spatial selective attention. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology: Evoked Potentials, 88, 210-219.
McLaughlin, J., Osterhout, L., & Kim, A. (2004). Neural correlates of second-language word learning: Minimal instruction produces rapid change. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 703-704.
Naccache, L., Puybasset, L., Gaillard, R., Serve, E., & Willer, J. (2005). Auditory mismatch negativity is a good predictor of awakening in comatose patients: A fast and reliable procedure. Clinical Neurophysiology, 116, 988-990.
Paavilainen, P., Simola, J., Jaramillo, M., Näätänen, R., & Winkler, I. (2001). Preattentive extraction of abstract feature conjunctions from auditory stimulation as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN). Psychophysiology, 38, 359-365.
Perrin, F., Bastuji, H., & García-Larrea, L. (2002). Detection of verbal discordances during sleep. Neuroreport: For Rapid Communication of Neuroscience Research, 13, 1345-1349.
Perrin, F., García-Larrea, L., Mauguière, F., & Bastuji, H. (1999). A differential brain response to the subject’s own name persists during sleep. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110, 2153-2164.
Pulvermüller, F., Shtyrov, Y., Kujala, T., & Näätänen R. (2004). Word-specific cortical activity as revealed by the mismatch negativity. Psychophysiology, 41, 106-112.
Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 849-860.
Saarinen, J., Paavilainen, P., Schöger, E., & Tervaniemi, M. (1992). Representation of abstract attributes of auditory stimuli in the human brain. Neuroreport: An International Journal for the Rapid Communication of Research in Neuroscience, 3, 1149-1151.
Sanders, L. D., & Neville, H. J. (2003). An ERP study of continuous speech processing. I. Segmentation, semantics, and syntax in native speakers. Cognitive Brain Research, 15, 228-240.
Sanders, L. D., Newport, E. L. & Neville, H. J. (2002). Segmenting nonsense: An event-related potential index of perceived onsets in continuous speech. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 700-703.
Schoenle, P. W., & Witzke, W. (2004). How vegetative is the vegetative state? Preserved semantic processing in VS patients-evidence from N400 event-related potentials. NeuroRehabilitation 19 (4), 329-34.
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1979). Mechanisms of sentence context effects in reading: Automatic activation and conscious attention. Memory & Cognition, 7, 77-85.
Stickgold, R., Scott, L., Rittenhouse, C., & Hobson, J. A. (1999). Sleep-induced changes in associative memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 182-193.
Van Berkum, J. J. A., Brown, C. M., Zwitserlood, P., Kooijman, V., & Hagoort, P. (2005). Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 443-467.
Van Petten, C., Coulson, S., Rubin, S., Plante, E., & Parks, M. (1999). Time course of word identification and semantic integration in spoken language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 394-417.
Vogel, E. K., Luck, S. J., & Shapiro, K. L. (1998). Electrophysiological evidence for a postperceptual locus of suppression during the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1656-1674.
Wicha, N. Y. Y., Moreno, E. M., & Kutas, M. (2003). Expecting gender: An event related brain potential study on the role of grammatical gender in comprehending a line drawing within a written sentence in Spanish. Cortex, 39, 483-508.
Wicha, N. Y. Y., Moreno, E. M. & Kutas, M. (2004). Anticipating words and their gender: An event-related brain potential study of semantic integration, gender expectancy, and gender agreement in Spanish sentence reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1272-1288.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kutas, M., Delong, K.A. (2008). A Sampler of Event-Related Brain Potential (ERP) Analyses of Language Processing. In: Breznitz, Z. (eds) Brain Research in Language. Literacy Studies, vol 1. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74980-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74980-8_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-74979-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-74980-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)