Abstract
This paper examines the key lines of inquiry that have been used in research focused on the identity, dynamics, and diffusion of MIS, as well as the strengths and weaknesses associated with each approach. We present five primary means: (1) citation analysis, (2) classification analysis, including rneta-analysis, (3) editorials and opinion pieces, (4) historical surveys of previous work, and (5) forums. We use the term “line of inquiry” since this allows us some latitude in considering dissimilar approaches—methods as well as communication channels. Using examples from the published literature on the status of MIS, we define and illustrate the five approaches. Subsequently, we discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each. Where possible, we extend the discussion to consider the implications of these lines of inquiry for future research.
The authors are listed in alphabetical order but have contributed equally to the article.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alavi, M., and Carlson, P. “A Review of MIS Research and Disciplinary Development,” Journal of Management Information Systems (8:4), Spring 1992, pp. 45–62.
Alter, S. “18 Reasons Why IT-Reliant Work Systems Should Replace ‘The IT Artifact’ as the Core Subject Matter of the IS Field,” Communications of the AIS (12), 2003, pp. 365–394.
Applegate, L. M., Cash, Jr., J. I., and Mills, Q. “Information Technology and Tomorrow’s Manager,” Harvard Business Review, November-December 1988, pp. 128–136.
Avison, D. E. “Is IS an Intellectual Subject?,” European Journal of Information Systems (12:3), September 2003, pp. 229–230.
Baskerville, R. L., and Meyers, M. D. “Information Systems as a Reference Discipline,” MIS Quarterly (26:1), March 2002, pp. 1–14.
Benbasat, I., and Weber, R. “Research Commentary: Rethinking ‘Diversity’ in Information Systems Research,” Information Systems Research (7:4), December 1996, pp. 389–399.
Benbasat. I., and Zmud, R. W. “Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance,” MIS Quarterly, 23(1), March 1999, pp. 3–16.
Benbasat, I., and Zmud, R. W. “The Identity Crisis Within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline’s Core Properties,” MIS Quarterly (27:2), June 2003, pp. 183–194.
Beniger, J. R. The Control Revolution: Technological and Economic Origins of the Information Society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986
Briggs, R. O., Nunamaker Jr., J. F., and Sprague, R. “Exploring the Outlands of the MIS Discipline,” Journal of Management Information Systems (16:3), Winter 1999–2000, pp. 5–9.
Carr, N. G. “IT Doesn’t Matter,” Harvard Business Review (81:5), May 2003, pp. 41–49.
Checkland, P., and Holwell, S. Information, Systems and Information Systems: Making Sense of the Field, Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 1998.
Crane, D. Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1972.
Culnan, M. “The Intellectual Development of Management Information Systems, 1972–1982: A Co-Citation Analysis,” Management Science (32:2), 1986, pp. 156–172.
Culnan, M. “Mapping the Intellectual Structure of MIS, 1980–1985: A Co-Citation Analysis,” MIS Quarterly (11:3), September 1987, pp. 340–352.
Culnan, M. J., and Swanson, E. B. “Research in Management Information Systems, 1980–1984: Points of Work and Reference,” MIS Quarterly (10:3), September 1986, pp. 289–302.
Currie, W., and Galliers, B. (eds.). Rethinking Management Information Systems: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Davis, G. B. “Information Systems Conceptual Foundations: Looking Backward and Forward,” in R. Baskerville, J. Stage, and J. DeGross (eds.), The Social and Organizational Perspective on Research and Practice in Information Technology, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000, pp. 61–82.
De Solla Price, D. Little Science, Big Science, New York: Columbia University Press, 1963.
Dutton, J. E., and Ashford, S. J. “Selling Issues to Top Management,” Academy of Management Review (18:3), 1993, pp. 231–244.
Fitzgerald, G. “Information Systems: A Subject with a Particular Perspective, No More, No Less (Response to Paul 2002),” European Journal of Information Systems (12), 2003, pp. 225–228.
Fjermestad, J., and Hiltz, S. R. “An Assessment of Group Support Systems Experimental Research: Methodology and Results,” Journal of Management Information Systems (15:3), Winter 1998–1999, pp. 7–149.
Fjermestad, J., and Hiltz, S. R. “Group Support Systems: A Descriptive Evaluation of Case and Field Studies,” Journal of Management Information Systems, (17:3), Winter 2000–2001, pp. 115–159.
Goles, T., and Hirschheim, R. “The Paradigm is Dead, the Paradigm is Dead...Long Live the Paradigm: The Legacy of Burell and Morgan,” Omega 28(3), 2000, pp. 249–268.
Hirschheim, R., and Klein, H. K. “Crisis in the IS Field?,” Journal of the Association for Information Systems (4:5), 2003, pp. 237–293.
Hunt, J. G. and Newell, P. F. “Management in the 1980’s Revisited,” Personnel Journal (50:1), January 1971, pp. 35–43, 71.
Ives, B., Parks, M. S., Porra, J., and Silva, L. “Phylogeny and Power in the IS Domain: A Response to Benbasat and Zmud’s Call for Returning to the IT Artifact,” Journal of the Association for Information Systems (5:3), March 2004, pp.108–124.
Katerattanakul, P., Han, B., and Rea, A. “Is Information Systems a Reference Discipline?,” Communications of the ACM (49:5), May 2006, pp. 114–118.
Katerattanakul, P., and Hong, S. “Quality and Knowledge Contribution of MISQ: A Citation Analysis,” Communications of the Association for Information Systems (11), 2003, pp. 271–288.
King, J. L. “Editorial Notes,” Information Systems Research (4:4), December 1993, pp. 291–298.
Kock, N., and Davison, R. “Dealing with Plagiarism in the Information Systems Research Community: A Look at Factors That Drive Plagiarism and Ways to Address Them,” MIS Quarterly (27:4), December 2003, pp. 511–532.
Kuhn, T. S. The Structure of Scientific Revolution (2nd ed.), Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 1970.
Kurtzweil, R. The Age of Spiritual Machines: When Computers Exceed Human Intelligence, New York: Penguin Books, 1999.
Larsen, T. J., and Levine, L. with Land, F., Myers, M. D., and Zmud, R. “The Identity and Dynamics of MIS,” panel presentation in D. Avison, S. Elliot, J. Krogstie, and J. Pries-Heje (eds.), The Past and Future of Information Systems: 1976–2006 and Beyond, IFIP 19th World Computer Congress, and TC8 Information System Stream, New York: Springer Science and Business Media, 2006, pp. 101–106.
Larsen, T. J., and Levine, L. “Searching for MIS: Coherence and Change in the Discipline,” Information Systems Journal (15), 2005, pp. 357–381.
Leavitt, H. J. and Whisler, T. L. “Management in the 1980’s,” Harvard Business Review (36:6), November-December 1958, pp. 41–48.
Lyytinen, K., and King, J. L. “Nothing at the Center? Academic Legitimacy in the Information Systems Field,” Journal of the Association for Information Systems (5:6), June 2004, pp. 220–246.
McLuhan, M., and Lapham, L. H. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man, Boston, MA.: The MIT Press, 1994.
Monarch, I. “Information Science and Information Systems: Converging or Diverging?,” in A. Kublik (ed.), Proceedings of the 28 th Annual Conference of the Canadian Association for Information: Dimensions of a Global Information Science, 2000 (available online at http://www.slis.ualberta.ca/cais2000/monarch.htm).
Myers, M. D. “The IS Core—VIII. Defining the Core Properties of the IS Discipline: Not Yet, Not Now,” Communications of the Association for Information Systems (12), 2002, pp. 582–587.
Nambisan, S. “Information Systems as a Reference Discipline for New Product Development,” MIS Quarterly (27:1), March 2003, pp. 1–18.
Nurminen, M. I., and Eriksson, I. V. “Information Systems Research: The ‘Infurgic’ Perspective,” International Journal of Information Management (19), 1999, pp. 87–94.
Orlikowski, W. J., and Baroudi, J. J. “Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions,” Information Systems Research (2:1), March 1991, pp. 1–28.
Orlikowski, W. J., and Iacono, C. S. “Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the ‘IT’ in IT Research-A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact,” Information Systems Research (12:2), June 2001, pp. 121–134.
Paul, R. J. “Is Information Systems an Intellectual Subject?,” European Journal of Information Systems (11), 2002, pp. 174–177.
Pfeffer, J. “Barriers to the Advance of Organizational Science: Paradigm Development as a Dependent Variable,” Academy of Management Review (18:4), 1993, pp. 599–620.
Pfeffers, K., and Ya, T. “Identifying and Evaluating the Universe of Outlets for Information Systems Research: Ranking the Journals,” Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application (5:1), 2003, pp. 63–84.
Robey. D. “Research Commentary: Diversity in Information Systems Research: Threat, Promise, and Responsibility,” Information Systems Research (7:4), December 1996, pp. 400–408.
Robey, D., and Markus, M. L. “Beyond Rigor and Relevance: Producing Consumable Research about Information Systems,” Information Resources Management Journal (11:1), Winter 1998, pp. 7–15.
Small, H. “Cited Documents as Concept Symbols,” Social Studies of Science (8:3), August 1978, pp. 327–340.
Small, H. “Co-citation Context Analysis and the Structure of Paradigms,” The Journal of Documentation (36:3), 1980, pp. 183–196.
Small, H. “Co-citation in the Scientific Literature: A New Measure of the Relationship Between Two Documents,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science, July–August 1973, pp. 265–269.
Stork, D. G. HAL’s Legacy: 2001’s Computer as Dream and Reality, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1997.
Vessey, I., Ramesh, V., and Glass, R. L. “Research in Information Systems: An Empirical Study of Diversity in the Discipline and ts Journals,” Journal of Management Information Systems (19:2), Fall 2002, pp. 129–174.
Vessey, I., Ramesh, V., and Glass, R. L. “A Unified Classification System for Research in the Computing Disciplines,” Information & Software Technology (47:4), March 2005, pp. 245–255.
Walstom, K. A., and Hardgrave, B. C. “Forums for Information Systems Scholars: III,” Information & Management (39), 2001, pp. 117–124.
Weber, R. “Toward a Theory of Artifacts: A Paradigmatic Base for Information Systems Research,” Journal of Information Systems (1:2), Spring 1987, pp. 3–19.
Weber, R. “Still Desperately Seeking the IT Artifact,” MIS Quarterly (27:2), June 2003, pp. iii–xi.
Westfall, R. D. “An IS Research Relevance Manifesto,” Communications of the Association for Information Systems (2:paper#14), September 1999 (available online at http://cais.aisnet.org/articles/2-14/article.htm).
Westin, S. M., Roy, M., and Kim, C. K. “Cross-Fertilization of Knowledge: The Case of MIS and its Reference Disciplines,” Information Resources Management Journal (7:2), 1994, pp. 24–34.
Whitley, R. The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences, Oxford, England: Clarendon Press, 1984.
Yates, J., and Orlikowski, W. “Genre Systems: Structuring Interaction Through Communicative Norms,” The Journal of Business Communication (39:1), January 2002, pp. 13–35.
Zmud, R. W. (ed.). Framing the Domains of IT Management: Projecting the Future Through the Past, Cincinnati, OH: Pinnaflex Educational Resources, Inc., 2000.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Larsen, T.J., Levine, L. (2007). The Identity, Dynamics, and Diffusion of MIS. In: McMaster, T., Wastell, D., Ferneley, E., DeGross, J.I. (eds) Organizational Dynamics of Technology-Based Innovation: Diversifying the Research Agenda. TDIT 2007. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, vol 235. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72804-9_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72804-9_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-72803-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-72804-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)