Skip to main content

From Confusion to Common Sense: Using Political Ethnography to Understand Social Mobilization in the Brazilian Northeast

  • Chapter
New Perspectives in Political Ethnography

The decade of the 1990s was a difficult one for the sugarcane region of northeastern Brazil. Local producers were hurt by falling international prices for sugar: from a high of almost one dollar per pound in the early 1980s, the price fell to an average of 10–12 cents a pound throughout the 1990s (World Bank Report No. 20754-BR 2002, p. 34). Price decreases were exacerbated by changes in the nature of state support: in 1989, the newly democratic Brazilian government began dismantling and progressively withdrawing its generous safety net for northeastern sugarcane producers (de Andrade and de Andrade 2001). Subsidies that had previously (since 1975) allowed northeastern producers to compete with their more efficient counterparts in the South were cut by more than 60% in 1989 (Buarque 1997). By 1995, 15 of 26 sugarcane distilleries in Pernambuco – the state responsible for a majority of the total sugarcane produced in the Northeast at that time – were either shut down or on the verge of bankruptcy (Lins 1996, p. 2). Production in the state had fallen from 20 million tons in 1989 to 14 million in 2000–2001 (de Andrade and de Andrade 2001, p. 147), and plantation and distillery owners were leaving their land for healthier industries elsewhere (particularly tourism on the coast). Common laborers were badly hurt by the crisis: in an industry heavily dependent on manual labor, an estimated 350,000 workers were unemployed in 1996 and considered unlikely to find work even during the harvest season.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abu-Lughod, L. (2000). Locating ethnography. Ethnography, 1, 261–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auyero, J. (2003). Contentious lives: Two Argentine women, two protests, and the quest for recognition. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1991). The weight of the world: Social suffering in contemporary society. Translated by Pricilla Parkhurst Ferguson. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branford, S., & Rocha, J. (2002). Cutting the wire: The story of the landless movement in Brazil. London: Latin American Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buarque, S. C. (1997). Proposta de reestruturação do setor sucro-alcooleiro e negociação de divida por terra para assentamentos de reforma agrária. Paper prepared for the workshop, Reestruturação do Setor Sucro-Alcooleiro e Reforma Agrária na Zona da Mata de Pernambuco, Recife.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burdick, J. (1995). Uniting theory and practice in the ethnography of social movements: Notes toward a hopeful realism. Dialectical Anthropology, 20, 361–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cazella, A. A. (1992). Assentamentos rurais e cooperação agrícola: Políticas conflitantes. Master’s Thesis in the Center for Research in Agriculture and Development with the Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro: Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Andrade, M. C. (1988). Área Ddo sistema canavieiro. Recife: Superintendencia do Desenvolvimento do Nordeste.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Andrade, M. C., & de Andrade, S. C. (2001). As usinas de pernambuco e a crise atual. Recife: UNTEPPE.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Soto, H. (1989). The other path: The invisible revolution in the third world. London: I.B. Tauris and Company Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diani, M., & McAdam, D. (2003). Social movements and networks: Relational approach to collective action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, M. (2001). Social movements: Changing paradigms and forms of politics. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 285–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, P. (1974). The sugar industry in São Paulo: Modernization without change, 1840–1910. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes, B. M. (1999). MST, movimento dos trabalhadores rurais sem terra: Formação e territorialização. São Paulo: Editora Hucitec.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freyre, G. (1978). The masters and the slaves. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, G., & Jasper, J. (1999). Caught in a winding, snarling vine: The structural bias of political process theory. Sociological Forum, 14, 27–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. (1998). Postcolonial developments: Agriculture in the making of modern India. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A., & Ferguson, J. (1997). Anthropological locations: Boundaries and grounds of a field science. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasper, J. (2004). A strategic approach to collective action: Looking for agency in social movement choices. Mobilization, 9(1): 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Julião, F. (1972). Cambão–the yoke: The hidden face of Brazil. Translated from the Portuguese by John Butt. Hammondsworth: Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, G. (2004). Geography and development: Critical ethnographies. Progress in Human Geography, 28, 91–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurzman, C. (2004). Can understanding undermine explanation? Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 34, 328–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lins, C. (1996). Programa de ação para o desenvolvimento da Zona da Mata do Nordeste. Recife, PE: Superintendent for the Development of the Northeast.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins, J. D. S. (1998). O cativeiro da terra. São Paulo: Editora Hucitec.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of contention. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MEPF (Ministério Extraordinário da Política Fundiária). (1998). Programa integrado de reforma na Zona da Mata Nordestina. Recife.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navarro, Z. (2000). Breaking new ground: Brazil’s MST. NACLA Report on the Americas, 33, 36–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortner, S. B. (1995). Resistance and the problem of ethnographic refusal. Comparative Studies of Society and History, 37, 173–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paige, J. (1975). Agrarian revolution: Social movements and export agriculture in the underdeveloped world. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulilo, M. (1996). Terra a vista.…e ão longe. Florianopolis, SC: Editora da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, A. (1997). The end of the peasantry: The rural labor movement in northeast Brazil, 1961–1988. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petras, J. (1997). Latin America: The resurgence of the left, New Left Review, 223, 17–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robles, W. (2001). The landless rural workers movement MST in Brazil. Journal of Peasant Studies, 282, 146–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, J. (2004). Meanings and mobilizations: A cultural politics approach to social movements and states. Latin American Research Review, 39(3): 106–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigaud, L. (1979). Os clandestinos e os direitos. São Paulo: Editora Duas Cidades.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stedile, J. P., & Fernandes, B. M. (1999). Brava gente: A trajetória do MST e a Luta Pela Terra no Brasil. São Paulo: Editora Fundação Perseu Abramo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51, 273–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, M. (2001). Development ethnographies. Ethnography, 2, 283–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolford, W. (2003). Families, fields, and fighting for land: The spatial dynamics of contention in rural Brazil. Mobilization, 8, 201–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolford, W. (2005, January 21). Every monkey has its own head: Rural sugarcane workers and the politics of becoming a peasant in northeastern Brazil. Paper presented at the Yale Agrarian Studies colloquium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, E. (2003). Insurgent collective action and civil war in El Salvador. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank Report No. 20754-BR. (2002). Growth and poverty reduction in Pernambuco: Developing a sustainable policy framework. Brazil Country Management Unit of the World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, A., & Wolford, W. (2003). To inherit the earth: The landless movement and the struggle for a new Brazil. Oakland, CA: Food First! Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wolford, W. (2007). From Confusion to Common Sense: Using Political Ethnography to Understand Social Mobilization in the Brazilian Northeast. In: Joseph, L., Mahler, M., Auyero, J. (eds) New Perspectives in Political Ethnography. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72594-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics