Skip to main content

STDs comprise a wide variety of pathogens, including viruses, bacteria, fungi, and protozoa, along with an equally broad range of clinical manifestations, from mild infections localized to the genitalia to more serious diseases affecting reproductive health, the central nervous system, heart, or the immune system. The fundamental reason for placing these diverse biological agents and their sequelae under the same category of STDs is that they share a common mode of transmission—that is, a common human behavior. Given that the category of STDs is defined according to a common behavior rather than a common biological pathogen or sequela, one would expect behavioral interventions to have been at the center of historical and current strategies to prevent and control STDs. Historically, however, the opposite has been true: compared with epidemic infectious diseases such as plague and cholera, which garnered significant public health attention, STD control was relegated to private physicians and largely ignored by public health officials, except for behavioral efforts aimed largely at “marginal” groups such as prostitutes or military personnel. This chapter explains why behavioral interventions for STD control have been a relatively neglected area of public health programs.

It should be noted that the term “behavioral interventions” has come into use relatively recently (since the 1980s), while behavioral science itself is a 20th-century creation. To avoid the anachronistic practice of imposing modern categories onto the past, it is important to explain past practices within their own historical context. The categories that people in the past used to describe and explain their STD prevention and control activities often developed from fundamentally different conceptions of disease transmission, public health, and human behavior. I have retained the original language (the “pox” instead of syphilis, if that was the term commonly used) to underscore the need to understand disease control efforts in context. Similarly, depending on the context, I will refer to the historic terminology used to characterize populations, groups, behaviors, and diseases, such as prostitutes rather than commercial sex workers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arrizabalaga J, Henderson J, French R. The Great Pox: The French Disease in Renaissance Europe. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nutton V. The seeds of disease: an explanation of contagion and infection from the Greeks to the Renaissance. Medical History. 1983;27:1–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Gentilcore D. Healers and Healing in Early Modern Italy, Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pomata G. Contracting a Cure: Patients, Healers, and the Law in Early Modern Bologna. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carmichael A. Contagion theory and contagion practice in fifteenth-century Milan. Renaissance Quarterly. 1991; 44:213–225.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schleiner W. Moral attitudes toward syphilis and its prevention in the Renaissance. Bull. Hist. Med. 1994;68:389–410.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McGough LJ. Quarantining beauty: the French disease in early modern Venice. In: Siena K P, ed. Sins of the Flesh: Responding to Sexual Disease in Early Modern Europe. Toronto: Centre for Reformation and Renaissance Studies; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schleiner W. Infection and cure through women: Renaissance constructions of syphilis. Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies. 1994;24:499–517.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Siena KP. Venereal Disease, Hospitals, and the Urban Poor: London's ‘Foul Wards,’ 1600–1800. Rochester: University of Rochester Press; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Corbin A. Women for Hire: Prostitution and Sexuality in France after 1850 (trans. Sheridan A). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bernstein L. Sonia's Daughters: Prostitutes and their Regulation in Imperial Russia. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gibson M. Prostitution and the State in Italy, 1860–1915. Columbus: Ohio State University Press; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Walkowitz J. Prostitution and Victorian Society: Women, Class and the State. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1980.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaminsky AP. Morality legislation and British troops in late nineteenth-century India. Military Affairs. 1979;43:78–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Levine P. Rereading the 1890s: venereal disease as “constitutional crisis” in Britain and British India. Journal of Asian Studies. 1996;55:585–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hershatter G. Dangerous Pleasures: Prostitution and Modernity in Twentieth-Century Shanghai. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Brandt AM. No Magic Bullet: A Social History of Venereal Disease in the United States since 1880, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gorchov L. Sexual Science and Sexual Politics: American Sex Research, 1920– 1956. Ph.D. Dissertation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Davidson R, Hall LA, eds. Sex, Sin and Suffering: Venereal Disease and European Society since 1870. New York: Routledge; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Haller M. Eugenics: Hereditarian Attitudes in American Thought. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tone A. Devices and Desires: A History of Contraceptives in America. New York: Hill and Wang; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  22. National Academies Archives, Washington, DC: Committee for Research in Problems of Sex, 1920–1965.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lord A. Models of masculinity: sex education, the United States Public Health Service, and the YMCA, 1919–1924. Journal of the History of Medicine. 2003;58:123–152.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lyons M. Medicine and morality: a review of responses to sexually transmitted diseases in Uganda in the twentieth century. In: Setel PW, Lewis M, Lyons M, eds. Histories of Sexually Transmitted Diseases and HIV/AIDS in Sub-Saharan Africa. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jochelson K. The Colour of Disease: Syphilis and Racism in South Africa, 1880– 1950. New York: Palgrave; 2001.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. McCulloch J. The management of venereal disease in a settler society: colonial Zimbabwe, 1900–1930. In: Setel PW, Lewis M, Lyons M, eds. Histories of Sexually Transmitted Diseases and HIV/AIDS in Sub-Saharan Africa. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sacco L. Sanitized for your protection: medical discourse and the denial of incest in the United States, 1890–1940. Journal of Women's History. 2000;14: 80–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. National Archives, College Park, MD, Record Group 90.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hegarty M. Patriots, prostitutes, patriotutes: the mobilization and control of female sexuality in the U.S. during World War II. Ph.D. Dissertation. Columbus: Ohio State University; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  30. National Archives, College Park, MD, Record Group 112.

    Google Scholar 

  31. National Archives, Southeast Region, East Point, GA, Record Group 442.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Angell M. A behavioral science action program in a venereal disease clinic. In: Proceedings of World Forum on Syphilis and Other Treponematoses. Atlanta: Communicable Disease Center, Venereal Disease Branch; 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Evans D. Sexually transmitted disease policy in the English National Health Service, 1948–2000: continuity and social change. In: Davidson R, Hall LA, eds. Sex, Sin and Suffering: Venereal Disease and European Society since 1870. New York: Routledge; 2001:237–252.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Greene JA. Therapeutic infidelities: ‘noncompliance’ enters the medical literature, 1955–1975. Social History of Medicine. 2004;17:327–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Spencer J. Personal Interview: February 22, 2005, Atlanta, GA and February 24, 2005, Gainesville, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Martich, F. Personal Interview: February 10, 2005, Atlanta, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Naehr, J. Personal Interview: January 18, 2005, Atlanta, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Johnson DK. The Lavender Scare: The Cold War Persecution of Gays and Lesbians in the Federal Government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Aral SO and Douglas JM. Personal Interviews: March 25, 2005, Atlanta, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Smith S. Sick and Tired of Being Sick and Tired: Black Women's Health Activism in America, 1890–1950. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1995.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  41. Jones JH. Bad Blood: The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment, 2nd ed., New York: Free Press; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Gamble VN. Under the shadow of Tuskegee: African Americans and health care. American Journal of Public Health. 1997;87:1773–1778.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. DeLeon PH, Pallak MS. Public health and psychology: an important, expanding interaction. American Psychologist. 1982;37:934–935.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Singer JE, Krantz DS. Perspectives on the interface between psychology and public health. American Psychologist. 1982;37:955–960.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Matarazzo JD. Behavioral health's challenge to academic, scientific, and professional psychology. American Psychology. 1982;37:1–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Matarazzo JD. (1980). Behavioral health and behavioral medicine: frontiers for a new health psychology. American Psychology. 1980;35:807–817.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McGough, L.J., Handsfield, H.H. (2007). History of Behavioral Interventions in STD Control. In: Aral, S.O., Douglas, J.M. (eds) Behavioral Interventions for Prevention and Control of Sexually Transmitted Diseases. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-48740-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-48740-3_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-85768-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-48740-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics