Skip to main content

Tumors of the Kidney and the Male Urogenital System

  • Chapter
Cancer Grading Manual

Abstract

Urogenital tumors are among the most common human tumors. Malignant tumors predominate, and the most important malignant neoplasms in this group are renal cell carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder, testicular carcinoma, and prostatic carcinoma. Testicular cancer is not generally assigned a microscopic grade, but the other 3 tumors are routinely graded according to well-established principles (Mostofi et al., 1998; Amin et al., 2004; Eble et al., 2004; Foster and Ross, 2004).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

Books and Monographs

  • Amin MB, Grignon DJ, Humphrey PA, Srigley JR. Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer: A Contemporary Approach. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eble JN, Sauter G, Epstein JE, Sesterhenn IA, eds. World Health Organization Classification of Tumors: Pathology and Genetics. Tumors of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs. Lyon: IARC; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster CS, Ross JS, eds. Pathology of the Urinary Bladder. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mostofi FK, Davis CJ. Histologic Typing of Kidney Tumors. 2nd edition. Berlin: Springer; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy WM, Grignon DJ, Perlman EJ. Atlas of Tumor Pathology. Tumors of the Kidney, Bladder, and Related Urinary Structures. 4th series. Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidner N, Cote RJ, Suster S, Weiss LM, eds. Modern Surgical Pathology, Philadelphia: Saunders, Elsevier; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

Articles

  1. Fuhrman SA, Lasky LC, Lima C. Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1982;6:655–663.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Al-Aynati M, Chen V, Salama S, et al. Interobserver and intraobserver variability using the Fuhrman grading system for renal cell carcinoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2003; 127:593–596.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Minardi D, Lucarini G, Mazzucchelli R, et al. Prognostic role of Fuhrman grade and vascular endothelial growth factor in pT1a clear cell carcinoma in partial nephrectomy specimens. J Urol. 2005;174:1208–1212.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Delahunt B, Eble JN. Papillary renal cell carcinoma: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 105 tumors. Mod Pathol. 1997;10:537–544.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rubin MA, Bismar TA, Curti S, Montie JE. Prostate needle biopsy reporting. How are the surgical members of the Society of Urologic Oncology using pathology reports to guide treatment of prostate cancer patients? Am J Surg Pathol. 2004;28:946–952.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gleason DF. Histologic grading of prostate cancer: a perspective. Hum Pathol. 1992;23:273–279.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Humphrey PA. Gleason grading and prognostic factors in carcinoma of the prostate. Mod Pathol. 2004;17:292–306.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lopez-Beltran A, Mikuz G, Luque RJ, Mazzucchelli R, Montironi R. Current practice of Gleason grading of prostate carcinoma. Virchows Arch. 2006;448:111–118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Epstein JI, Allsbrook WC Jr, Amin MB, Egevad LL. ISUP Grading Committee. The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005; 29:1228–1242.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Srigley JR, Amin MB, Boccon-Gibod L, et al. Prognostic and predictive factors in prostate cancer: historical perspectives and recent international consensus initiatives. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 2005;216:8–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Epstein JI, Amin MB, Reuter VR, Mostofi FK. The World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology consensus classification of urothelial (transitional cell) neoplasms of the urinary bladder. Bladder Consensus Conference Committee. Am J Surg Pathol. 1998;22:1435–1448.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Montironi R, Lopez-Beltran A. The 2004 WHO classification of bladder tumors: a summary and commentary. Int J Surg Pathol. 2005;13:143–153.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Amin MB, McKenney JK. An approach to the diagnosis of flat intraepithelial lesions of the urinary bladder using the World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology consensus classification system. Adv Anat Pathol. 2002;9:222–232.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Damjanov, I., Mikuz, G. (2007). Tumors of the Kidney and the Male Urogenital System. In: Damjanov, I., Fan, F. (eds) Cancer Grading Manual. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-33751-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-33751-7_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-33750-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-33751-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics