Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

Abstract

The terms “crisis” and “disaster” are often used synonymously. In academic discourse, however, these concepts refer to different situations that prompt different questions with answers that require different theories. At the same time, the concepts are clearly related. Both deal with events that belong in the “un-ness” category: unexpected, undesirable, unimaginable, and often unmanageable situations (Hewitt, 1983).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Flin, R. (1996). Sitting in the hot seat: Leaders and teams for critical incidents. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff, I.I., & Pauchant, T.C. (1990). We’re so big and powerful nothing bad can happen to us: An investigation of America’s crisis prone corporations. Secaucus, NJ: Carol Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, G. (2001). Sources of power: How people make decisions (7th ed.). London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagan, S.D. (1993). The limits of safety: Organizations, accidents and nuclear weapons. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stallings, R.A. (2005). Disaster, crisis, collective stress and mass deprivation. In R.W. Perry & E. L. Quarantelli (Eds.), What is a disaster: New answers to old questions (pp. 237–274). Philadelphia: Xlibris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1992). Risk and blame: Essays in cultural theory. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, A. (2003). Overview: Crisis management, influences, responses and evaluation. Parliamentary Affairs, 56, 363–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, E. (1983). Political violence, crises and revolutions: Theories and research. Cambridge: Schenkman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quarantelli, E.L. (1998b). Epilogue: Where we have been and where we might go. In E.L. Quarantelli (Ed.), What is a disaster: Perspective on the question (pp. 234–273). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkland, T.A. (1997). After disaster: Agenda setting, public policy, and focusing events. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermann, C.F. (1972). International crises: Insights from behavioral research. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raphael, B. (1986). When disaster strikes: How individuals and communities cope with catastrophe. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebow, R.N. (1981). Between peace and war: The nature of international crisis. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauchant, T.C., & Mitroff, I.I. (1992). Transforming the crisis-prone organization: Preventing individual, organizational and environmental tragedies. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, T. (2000). Acts of God: The unnatural history of natural disaster in America. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, K. (1983b). The idea of calamity in a technocratic age. In K. Hewitt (Ed.), Interpretations of calamity from the perspective of human ecology (pp. 3–32). London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boin, R.A., ‘t Hart, P., Stern, E., & Sundelius, B. (2005). The politics of crisis management: Public leadership under pressure. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1975). Legitimation crisis. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boin, R.A. (2005). From crisis to disaster: Towards an integrative perspective. In R.W. Perry & E.L. Quarantelli (Eds.), What is a disaster? New answers to old questions (pp. 153–172). Philadelphia: Xlibris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, M. (2000). Ubiquity: Why catastrophes happen. New York: Three Rivers Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagadec, P. (1997). Learning processes for crisis management in complex organizations. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 5, 24–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuny, F.C. (1983). Disaster and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, W. & Thomas, D. (1928). The child in America: Behavior problems and programs. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturken, M. (1997). Tangled memories: The Vietnam War, the AIDS epidemic, and the politics of remembering. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I.L. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascos. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jervis, R. (1976). Perception and misperception in international politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drabek, T.E., & Quarantelli, E.L. (1967). Scapegoats, villains, and disasters. Transaction, 4, 12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, R.W., & Quarantelli, E.L. (2005). What is a disaster? New answers to old questions. Philadelphia: Xlibris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsti, O.R. (1979). Theories of crisis decision making. In P. G. Lauren (Ed.), Diplomacy: New approaches in history, theory, and policy (pp. 99–136). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linz, J.J., & Stepan, A.C. (1978). (Eds.). The breakdown of democratic regimes. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, G.T. (1971). Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban missile crisis. Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I., Herek, G., & Huth, P. (1987). Decision-making during international crises: Is quality of process related to outcome? Journal of Conflict Resolution, 31(3), 542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, E.C. (1946). Institutions in process. In A. McClung Lee (Ed.), New outline of the principles of sociology (pp. 236–247). New York: Barnes & Noble.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brecher, M. (1993). Crises in world politics: Theory and reality. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I.L., & Mann, L. (1977). Decision-making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice and commitment.New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, J. (1990). Human error. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. (1999). Normal accidents: Living with high-risk technologies (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildavsky, A.B. (1988). Searching for safety. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz, R.S., & Browne, W.P. (2004). Crisis management, crisis response: An introduction to the symposium. Review of Policy Research, 21, 141–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khong, Y.F. (1992). Analogies at war: Korea, Munich, Dien Bien Phu, and the Vietnam decisions of 1965. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, A.L. (Ed.). (1991). Avoiding war: Problems of crisis management. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fearn-Banks, K. (1996). Crisis communications: A casebook approach. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, E.K. (1997). Crisis and learning: A balance sheet. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 5, 69–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pidgeon, N., Kasperson, R.E., & Slovic, P. (Eds.). (2003). The social amplification of risk. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstone, J.A., & Useem, B. (1999). Prison riots as microrevolutions: An extension of state-centered theories of revolution. American Journal of Sociology, 104, 985–1029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddington, D.P. (1992). Contemporary issues in public disorder: A comparative and historical approach. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chiles, J.R. (2001). Inviting disaster: Lessons from the edge of technology. New York: Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boin, R.A., & Rattray, W.A.R. (2004). Understanding prison riots: Towards a threshold theory. Punishment & Society, 6, 47–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, U., Boin, R.A., & Comfort, L.K. (Eds.). (2001). Managing crises: Threats, dilemmas, opportunities. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K.E., & Sutcliffe, K.M. (2002). Managing the unexpected: Assuring high performance in an age of complexity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quarantelli, E.L. (2005a). A social science research agenda for the disasters of the 21st century. In R.W. Perry & E.L. Quarantelli (Eds.), What is a disaster? New answers to old questions (pp. 325–396). Philadelphia: Xlibris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almond, G.A., Flanagan, S., & Mundt, R (Eds.). (1973). Crisis, choice and change: Historical studies of political development. Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, M.J. (1977). Political language: Words that succeed and policies that fail. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, E.K., & Sundelius, B. (2002). Crisis management Europe: An integrated regional research and training program. International Studies Perspectives, 3, 771–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I.L. (1989). Crucial decisions: Leadership in policymaking and crisis management. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichengreen, B. (2002). Financial crises: And what to do about them. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B.A. (1978). Man-made disasters. London: Wykeham.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Boin, A., ‘T Hart, P. (2007). The Crisis Approach. In: Handbook of Disaster Research. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-32353-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics