Abstract
Several issues raised in this study are of heightened importance at the upper secondary level. There are many tensions at this level of schooling contributing to a reluctance by teachers to teach mathematics by modelling and a scepticism by many students that modelling is central to their mathematical learning. Several of these tensions are raised as the issues are discussed in this chapter. The challenge is for modelling to be seen as an essential embedded element of mathematics, mathematics teaching and assessment whether students are in academic, technical or general education courses.
Valued contributions to a discussion provided by: Michèle Artaud, Ferdinando Arzarello, Olive Chapman, Dirk De Bock, Solomon Garfunkel, Jerry Legé, Vimolan Mudaly, Geoffrey Roulet, Akihiko Saeki, and Rudolf Strässer.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Antonius, S. (2004). Validity and competencies in modelling based project examination. In H.-W. Henn & W. Blum (Eds.), ICMI Study 14: Applications and Modelling in Mathematics Education, (pp. 9–16). Dortmund: University of Dortmund.
Artaud, M. (2004). Contributions from the anthropological theory of didactics. In H.-W. Henn & W. Blum (Eds.), ICMI Study 14: Applications and Modelling in Mathematics Education, (pp. 17–22). Dortmund: University of Dortmund.
Arzaello, F., Pezzi, G., & Robutti, O. (2004). Modelling body motion: An approach to functions using measure instruments. In H.-W. Henn & W. Blum (Eds.), ICMI Study 14: Applications and Modelling in Mathematics Education, (pp. 23–28). Dortmund: University of Dortmund.
Burkhardt, H. (2004). Establishing modelling in the curriculum: Barriers and levers. In H.-W. Henn & W. Blum (Eds.), ICMI Study 14: Applications and Modelling in Mathematics Education, (pp. 53–58). Dortmund: University of Dortmund.
Chapman, O. (2004). Teachers’ conceptions and teaching strategies that facilitate mathematical modelling. In H.-W. Henn & W. Blum (Eds.), ICMI Study 14: Applications and Modelling in Mathematics Education, (pp. 65–70). Dortmund: University of Dortmund.
Clatworthy, N.J. & Galbraith, P.J. (1989). Mathematical modelling: An attack on conformity. Australian Senior Mathematics Journal 3(2), 88–106.
Henning, H. & Keune, M. (2004). Levels of modelling competencies. In H.-W. Henn & W. Blum (Eds.), ICMI Study 14: Applications and Modelling in Mathematics Education, (pp. 115–120). Dortmund: University of Dortmund.
Kadijevich, D. (2004). How to attain a wider implementation of mathematical modelling in everyday mathematics education?. In H.-W. Henn & W. Blum (Eds.), ICMI Study 14: Applications and Modelling in Mathematics Education, (pp. 133–138). Dortmund: University of Dortmund.
Kutzler, B. (2000). The algebraic calculator as a pedagogical tool for teaching mathematics. In A. Gagatsis & G. Makrides (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2 nd Mediterranean Conference on Mathematics Education, (pp. 142–160). Nicosia, Cyprus.
Lakoma, E. (2004). Modelling in mathematics education — The case of probability and statistics teaching. In H.-W. Henn & W. Blum (Eds.), ICMI Study 14: Applications and Modelling in Mathematics Education, (pp. 139–144). Dortmund: University of Dortmund.
Lamon, S., Parker, W., & Houston, K. (2003). Mathematical modelling: A way of life. In S. Lamon, W. Parker, & K. Houston (Eds.), Mathematical Modelling: A Way of Life, (pp. ix–x). Chichester: Horwood Publishing.
Legé J. (2004). “To model, or let them model?” That is the question! In H.-W. Henn & W. Blum (Eds.), ICMI Study 14: Applications and Modelling in Mathematics Education, (pp. 145–150). Dortmund: University of Dortmund.
Ontario Ministry of Education (2000). The Ontario curriculum: Grades 11 and 12 Mathematics 2000. Toronto.
Palm, T. (2002). The Realism of Mathematical School Tasks — Features and Consequences (Research reports, No. 2, in Mathematics Education). Umeå, Sweden: Department of Mathematics.
Palm, T. & Burman, L. (2004). Reality in mathematics assessment: An analysis of task-reality concordance in Finnish and Swedish national assessments. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education 9(3), 1–33.
Roulet, G. & Suurtamm, C. (2004). Modelling: Subject images and teacher practice. In H.-W. Henn & W. Blum (Eds.), ICMI Study 14: Applications and Modelling in Mathematics Education, (pp. 229–234). Dortmund: University of Dortmund.
Stillman, G. (2001). The impact of school-based assessment on the implementation of a modelling/applications-based curriculum: An Australian example. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications 20(3), 101–107.
Stillman, G. (2002). Assessing Higher Order Mathematical Thinking through Applications. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Queensland, Australia.
Stillman, G. (2004). Sustained curriculum change: The example of the implementation of applications and modelling curricula in two Australian states. In H.-W. Henn & W. Blum (Eds.), ICMI Study 14: Applications and Modelling in Mathematics Education, (pp. 261–266). Dortmund: University of Dortmund.
Strässer, R. (2004). Everyday instruments: On the use of mathematics. In H.-W. Henn & W. Blum (Eds.), ICMI Study 14: Applications and Modelling in Mathematics Education, (pp. 267–272). Dortmund: University of Dortmund.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stillman, G. (2007). Upper Secondary Perspectives on Applications and Modelling. In: Blum, W., Galbraith, P.L., Henn, HW., Niss, M. (eds) Modelling and Applications in Mathematics Education. New ICMI Study Series, vol 10. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-29822-1_52
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-29822-1_52
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-29820-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-29822-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)