Skip to main content

Abstract:

Qualitative research refers to the group of inquiry approaches developed to produce knowledge about the experiential realm of human beings. The focus of these approaches is on describing and understanding the meanings people attach to their encounters with other people, their cultural environment, and material objects. Qualitative research holds that the organization and content of the human experiential realm more closely resembles that of natural language rather than numbers. Qualitative studies generate data in the form of participant descriptions of their experiences and use literary analytic procedures to produce higher-order descriptions and understandings of the investigated experience. Qualitative studies produce a different kind of knowledge than quantitative studies. Its studies are concerned to examine the depth and fullness of its topic of interest. Because of the kind of knowledge produced by qualitative research, it is grounded in a different ontological and epistemological base than quantitative research. Understanding and practicing qualitative research requires that students do not simply transfer quantitative research principles to qualitative studies, but approach gaining competency in qualitative research from within its own perspective. There are two levels of competency in qualitative research – the basic level and the expert level. Basic level competency includes knowledge about qualitative research including its philosophy of knowledge, its area of study, the tools and techniques it uses, and its traditions. A student who achieves a basic level competency should be able to read and understand a qualitative research report. Expert level competency is an advance beyond the basic level in that, in addition to understanding, it concerns mastery of the skills needed to conduct a qualitative study. These are practice skills and include mastery of in-depth qualitative interviewing and observation, mastery of analytic skills of data in linguistic form, and mastery of communicating results transparently. Mastery of expert competency is achieved by advancement through various stages of skill development to reach a level of expertise. A student who has achieved expert competency should be able to conduct a worthy qualitative study.

The term qualitative research refers to a collection of linguistically based social science research approaches that focus on the study of the human experiential realm. The modern-day practice of qualitative research can be traced to its emergence in the 1970s as part of a reform movement in the social sciences (Schwandt, 2000). The reformers were interested in studying the meanings and values through which people understood and made sense of their encounters with the world, with others, and with themselves. They held that the then current mainstream social science methods, with their commitment to a numeric form of data and to statistical analyses, were inadequate for understanding human existence as it was experienced by persons. The reformers proposed that a research approach that was language-based, rather than numeric-based, would allow for deeper and more nuanced knowledge of human experience. In their development of language-based research, the reformers retrieved and revised earlier attempts at such a research, for example, anthropological field studies and University of Chicago symbolic interaction studies. In the decades since 1970, qualitative- or linguistic-based research has become an important component in the repertoire of social science inquiry methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 949.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th, text revision ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, P. D., Giorgi, A., & de Koning, A. J. J. (Eds.). (1986). Qualitative research in psychology. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azar, B. (2008). Qualitative research is gaining ground and respect. gradPSYCH, 6(1), Retrieved from http://gradpsych.apags.org/jan08/upclose.html.

  • Banister, P., Burman, E., Parker, I., Taylor, M., & Tindall, C. (1994). Qualitative methods in psychology: A research guide. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, R. S., & Kitzinger, J. (Eds.). (1999). Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman, C. (1987). Codifying the social scientific style: The APA Publication Manual as a behaviorist rhetoric. In Nelson, J. S., Megill, A., & McCloskey, D. N. (Eds.), The rhetoric of the human sciences: Language and argument in scholarship and public affairs (pp. 125–144). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benner, P. (1984). From novice to expert: Excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benner, P. (Ed.). (1994). Interpretative phenomenology: Embodiment, caring, and ethics in health and illness. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brentano, F. (1874/1995). Psychology from an empirical standpoint. (Rancurello, A. C., Terrel, D. B., & McAlister, L. L. Trans.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (2007a). Grounded theory in historical perspective: An epistemological account. In Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K., (Eds.), The Sage handbook of grounded theory (pp. 31–57). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (2007b). The sage handbook of grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camic, P. M., Rhodes, J. E., & Yardley, L. (Eds.). (2003). Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, J. W. (2006). A phenomenal topology of positive interpersonal emotions (Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, 2006). Dissertation Abstracts International, 68, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln Y. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 509–535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charon, J. M. (2004). Symbolic interactionsim (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clandinin, D. J. (Ed.). (2007). Handbook of narrative inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. (1994). Decartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Avon.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, G., Gough, B., & Parker, M. (Eds.). (2003–2008). Qualitative research in psychology. Philadelphia: Taylor-Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1990/2003). The problem of genesis in Husserl’s philosophy. (Hobson, M. trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dey, I. (1993). Qualitative data analysis: A user-friendly guide for social scientists. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, S. E., & Dreyfus, H. L. (1980). A five-stage model of the mental activities involved in directed skill acquisition. University of California at Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fechner, G. T. (1860/1966). Elements of psychophysics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fieldling, N. G., & Lee, R. M. (1998). Computer analysis and qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1895/1966). Studies in hysteria. New York: Avon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1985). The mind’s new science. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1973). Interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelso, C. J., & Hayes, J. A. (1998). The psychotherapy relationship: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi, A. (1970a). Psychology as a human science. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi, A. (1970b). Toward a phenomenologically based research in psychology. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 1(1), 75–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1965). Awareness of dying. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1964). I never promised you a rose garden. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffen, C., & Bengry-Howell, A. (2008). Ethnography. In Willig, C., & Stainton-Rogers, W. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 15–31). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A. (Eds.). (2002). Handbook of interview research: Context and method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C. G. (1965). Aspects of scientific explanation and other essays in the philosophy of science. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hergenhahn, B. R. (1997). An introduction to the history of psychology (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holton, J. A. (2007). The coding process and its challenges. In Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of grounded theory (pp. 265–310). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1925/1977). Phenomenological psychology (Scanlon, J. Trans.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1937/1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental psychology (Carr, D. Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1890/1950). The principles of psychology: Vol. 1. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1902). The varieties of religious experience. New York: Longmans, Green & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonas, H. (1966). The phenomenon of life: Toward a philosophical biology. Westwood, CT: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen, D. L. (1989). Participant observation: A methodology for human studies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1781/1965). Critique of pure reason (Smith, N. K. Trans. Unabridged ed.). New York: St. Martin’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubler-Ross, E. (1969). On death and dying. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, D. M. (Ed.). (1993). Modernity and the hegemony of vision. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewins, A., & Silver, C. (2007). Using software in qualitative research: A step-by-step guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M., Sadlo, G., & Stew, G. (2006). The phenomenon of boredom. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 193–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, M. (2003). The paradox of loss: Toward a relational theory of grief. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeker, M. A. (2004). Surrogate decision-making at the end of life. Qualitative Health Care Research, 13(1), 100–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945/1962). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). New York: Humanities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishler, E. G. (1986). Research interviewing: Context and narrative. Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. L. (1997). The focus group kit. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, J. M. (2007). Sampling in grounded theory. In Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (Eds.), The sage handbook of grounded theory (pp. 229–244). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T. (1970). What is it like to be a bat? Philosophical Review, 79, 394–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pak, J. H. (2006). Korean American women stories of acculturation and changing selfs. New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, I. (2005). Qualitative psychology: Introducing radical research. Berkshire, England: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (1980). Qualitative evaluation methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petitot, J., Varela, F. J., Pachoud, B., & Roy, J.-M. (Eds.). (1999). Naturalizing phenomenology: Issues in contemporary phenomenology and cognitive science. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child (M. Cook, Trans.). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polkinghorne, D. E. (1983). Methodology for the human sciences: Systems of inquiry. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polkinghorne, D. E. (1989). Phenomenological research methods. In Valle, R. S., & Halling, S. (Eds.), Existential-phenomenological perspectives in psychology (pp. 41–60). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polkinghorne, D. E. (2005). Language and meaning: Data collection in qualitative research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 137–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polkinghorne, D. E. (2007). Validity in narrative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(2), 471–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, W. J. (1996). An analysis of thinking and research about qualitative methods. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramesh, S. (2005). Integration of science and practice: A collective case study of scientist-practitioner programs in counseling psychology (Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, 2004). Dissertation Abstracts International, 66, 2116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (2004). Memory, history, forgetting. (Blamey, K., & Pellauer, D. Trans.). Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2005). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saussure, F. D. (1907–1911/1966). Course in general linguistics. (Baskin, W. Trans.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwandt, T. A. (2000). Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry: Interpretation, hermeneutics, and social construction. In Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 189–213). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwandt, T. A. (2007). The Sage dictionary of qualitative inquiry (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seale, C., Gobo, G., Gubrium, J. F., & Silverman, D. (Eds.). (2004). Qualitative research practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavelson, R. J., & Towne, L. (Eds.). (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. A. (Ed.). (2003). Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. D. (1986). Behaviorism and logical positivism: A reassessment of the alliance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. New York: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titchener, E. B. (1896). An outline of psychology. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Kaam, A. (1969). Existential foundations of psychology. Garden City, NY: Image Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosniadou, S., & Ortony, A. (Eds.). (1989). Similarity and analogical reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, R. S. (1994). Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1988). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willig, C. (2001). Introducing qualitative research in psychology: Adventures in theory and method. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willig, C., & Stainton-Rogers, W. (Eds.). (2008). The sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolcott, H. F. (1994). Transforming qualitative data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolcott, H. F. (2001). Writing up qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wundt, W. (1900–1920). Völkerpsychologie [group psychology]: Vol. 1–10. Leipzig, Germany: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Polkinghorne, D.E. (2010). Qualitative Research. In: Thomas, J.C., Hersen, M. (eds) Handbook of Clinical Psychology Competencies. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09757-2_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09757-2_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-09756-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-09757-2

  • eBook Packages: Behavioral Science

Publish with us

Policies and ethics