Skip to main content

Geographical Units of Analysis and the Analysis of Crime

  • Chapter
Putting Crime in its Place

Abstract

When spatial analysis of crime is conducted, the analyst should not ignore the spatial units that data are aggregated into and the impact of this choice on the interpretation of findings. Just as several independent variables are considered to determine whether they have statistical significance, a consideration of multiple spatial units of analysis should be made as well, in order to determine whether the choice of aggregation level used in a spatial analysis can result in biased findings. This chapter considers four classes of problems that can arise when data bounded in space are analyzed. These problems, inherent in most studies of space, include: issues associated with politically bounded units of aggregation, edge effects of bounded space, the modifiable aerial unit problem (MAUP), and ways in which the results of statistical analyses can be manipulated by changes in the level of aggregation. Techniques that can be used to alleviate each of the methodological difficulties described in this chapter are then discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Boots, B., & Getis, A. (1988). Point pattern analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chainey, S., & Ratcliffe, J. (2005). GIS and crime mapping. London: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dacey, M. (1975). Evaluation of the Poisson approximation to measures of the random pattern in a square. Geographical Analysis, 7, 351–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, K. (1978). Simulations to determine the variance and edge effects of total nearest-neighbor distance. In: I. Hodder (Ed.), Simulation methods in archaeology (pp. 91–95). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, D., & Amrheim, C. (1983). An evaluation of correction techniques for boundary effects in spatial statistical analysis: Traditional methods. Geographical Analysis, 15, 352–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reboussin, R., Warren, J., & Hazelwood, R. (1995). Mapless mapping in analyzing the spatial distribution of serial rapes. In: C. Block, M. Dabdoub, & S. Fregley (Eds.), Crime analysis through computer mapping (pp. 69–74). Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rengert, G. (1996). The geography of illegal drugs. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rengert, G., Ratcliffe, J., & Chakravorty, S. (2005). Policing illegal drug markets: Geographic approaches to crime reduction. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roncek, D., & Maier, P. (1991). Bars, blocks and crimes revisited: Linking the theory of routine activities to the empiricism of ‘hot spots.’ Criminology, 29(4), 725–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, C., & McKay, H. (1942). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas: A study of rates of delinquents in relation to different characteristics of local communities in American cities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snijders, T., & Bosker, R. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobler, W. (1970). A computer model simulation of urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography, 46(2), 234–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeates, M. (1974). An introduction to quantitative analysis in human geography. New York: McGraw Hill Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zorn, C. (1998). An analytic and empirical examination of zero-inflated and hurdle Poisson specifications. Sociological Methods and Research, 26(3), 368–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rengert, G.F., Lockwood, B. (2009). Geographical Units of Analysis and the Analysis of Crime. In: Weisburd, D., Bernasco, W., Bruinsma, G.J. (eds) Putting Crime in its Place. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09688-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics