Skip to main content

Treatment of Hypertension: Which Goal for Which Patient?

  • Chapter
Hypertension: from basic research to clinical practice

Part of the book series: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology ((AIM,volume 956))

Abstract

Hypertension remains the most important risk factor for cardiovascular disease. If antihypertensive drugs choice is well guided today, blood pressure (BP) target still a subject of controversies. Residual risk is matter of debate and the lower- the better dogma is come back again regarding to data reported from recent trials. The J curve, reason for European Society of Hypertension Guidelines reappraisal in 2009, is criticized by recent data. The one goal (<140/90 mmHg) fit 90 mmg 90 mmHg) fit all should be adapted as a personalized goal guided by evidence generated by randomized controlled trials. Target controversy is back because of the results of ACCORD and SPRINT trials challenging the common systolic BP target less 140 mmHg to less than 120 mmHg. The first was performed in diabetic patients and the second in patients at high cardiovascular risk; elderly aged of 75 years and above, or patients with chronic kidney disease, or with pre-existing subclinical or clinical cardiovascular disease or a Framingham 10-year cardiovascular disease risk score of 15 % or above, however non diabetic. If the first trial was negative, SPRINT reports a huge reduction of the composite primary outcome, which included myocardial infarction, other acute coronary syndromes, stroke, heart failure or death from cardiovascular causes by 25 %, and the risk of death from all causes by 27 %, when target systolic BP is lower than 120 mmHg compared to lower than 140 mmHg. However, BP was measured by automated office BP technique which correlates more with home BP measurement than auscultatory office BP measurement. Also, only significant less heart failure in the intensive arm was driving the difference in mortality favoring the intensive arm in SPRINT. The greater use of diuretics may have demasked latent heart failure in hypertensive patients with rather high cardiovascular risk.

More convincing data suggest that BP should be diagnosed early and treatment should be started at BP level of 140 mmHg and above, based on an office BP measurement, confirmed by an out-of-office BP measurement. Target systolic BP should be less than 140 mmHg if BP is measured by classic auscultatory method, less than 120 mmHg in high risk patients if BP is measured by automated office BP measurement. These targets are relevant in elderly patients if no orthostatic hypotension occurred, patients with non proteinuric chronic kidney disease (eGFR < 60 ml/mn/1.73 m2) and patients with cardiovascular disease or a Framingham score more than 15 %. However attention should be taken on diastolic BP if lower than 70 mmHg because of an increasing risk of ischemic heart event and on renal function since acute renal failure is more frequently reported at these low targets.

In diabetic patients, SBP target should be less than 140 mmHg according to ACCORD trial. However, for patients with protein-creatinine ratio >500 mg/g (albumin-creatinine ratio > 300 mg/g), with or without diabetes, lower SBP target should be proposed for renal protection aiming SBP < 130 mmHg as recommended by KDIGO guidelines.

In patients at low or intermediate risk, without cardiovascular disease, SBP should start to be treated when SBP is above 140 mmHg, and when treated, target BP should be less than 140 mmHg as reported by HOPE-3 trial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • [no authors listed] (1967) Effects of treatment on morbidity in hypertension. Results in patients with diastolic blood pressure averaging 115 through 129mmhg. JAMA 202:1028–1034

    Google Scholar 

  • [no authors listed] (1970) Effects of treatment on morbidity in hypertension. II. Results in patients with diastolic blood pressure averaging 90 through 114mmhg. JAMA 213:1143–1052

    Google Scholar 

  • ACCORD Study Group, Cushman WC, Evans GW, Byington RP et al (2010) Effects of intensive blood-pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 362:1575–1585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakris GL, Williams M, Dworkin L et al (2000) Preserving renal function in adults with hypertension and diabetes: a consensus approach. National Kidney Foundation Hypertension and Diabetes Executive Committees Working Group. Am J Kidney Dis 36:646–661

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beckett NS, Peters R, Fletcher AE, et al. for the HYVET Study Group (2008) Treatment of hypertension in patients 80 years of age or older. N Engl J Med 358:1887–1898

    Google Scholar 

  • Blacher J, Halimi JM, Hanon O et al (2013) Prise en charge de l’hypertension artérielle de l’adulte. Recommandations 2013 de la Société française d’hypertension artérielle. Presse Med 42:819–825

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration (2014) Blood pressure-lowering treatment based on cardiovascular risk: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet 384:591–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure, National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating Committee et al (2003) The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA 289:2560–2572

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen DL, Townsend RR (2016) Which patients does the SPRINT study not apply to and what are the appropriate blood pressure goals in these populations? J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 18:477–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper-DeHoff RM, Gong Y, Handberg EM et al (2010) Tight blood pressure control and cardiovascular outcomes among hypertensive patients with diabetes and coronary artery disease. JAMA 304:61–68

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan E, Stanton A, Thijs L et al (2005) Superiority of ambulatory over clinic blood pressure measurement in predicting mortality: the Dublin outcome study. Hypertension 46:156–161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott WJ (2003) The economic impact of hypertension. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 5(3 Suppl 2):3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ESH-ESC Task Force on the Management of Arterial Hypertension (2007) Guidelines 2007 ESH-ESC practice guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. J Hypertens 25:1751–1762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaede P, Vedel P, Larsen N et al (2003) Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 348:383–393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gaede P, Lund-Andersen H, Parving HH et al (2008) Effect of a multifactorial intervention on mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 358:580–591

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • GBD 2013 Risk Factors Collaborators (2015) Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 386:2287–2323

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hajem S, Hsairi M (2013) Le système national d’information sur les causes de décès: Diagnostic de situation et principaux résultats. National Institute of Public Health, Ministry of Heath, Tunisia

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson L, Zanchetti A, Carruthers SG et al (1998) Effects of intensive bloodpressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: principal results of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomised trial. HOT Study Group. Lancet 351:1755–1762

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jarraya F, Lakhdar R, Kammoun K et al (2013) Microalbuminuria: a useful marker of cardiovascular disease. Iran J Kidney Dis 7:178–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Julius S, Kjeldsen SE, Weber M et al (2004) Outcomes in hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk treated with regimens based on valsartan or amlodipine: the VALUE randomized trial. Lancet 363:2022–2031

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kannel WB, Dawber TR, Kagan A et al (1961) Factors of risk in the development of coronary heart disease–six year follow-up experience. The Framingham Study. Ann Intern Med 55:33–50

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Blood Pressure Work Group (2012) KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the management of blood pressure in chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int (Suppl.) 2:337–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjeldsen SE, Narkiewicz K, Hedner T et al (2016a) The SPRINT study: outcome may be driven by difference in diuretic treatment demasking heart failure and study design may support systolic blood pressure target below 140 mmHg rather than below 120 mmHg. Blood Press 25:63–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kjeldsen SE, Berge E, Bangalore S et al (2016b) No evidence for J-shaped curve in treated hypertensive patients with increased cardiovascular risk: the VALUE trial. Blood Press 25:83–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, Prospective Studies Collaboration et al (2002) Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet 360:1903–1913

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis O (1994) Stephen Hales and the measurement of blood pressure. J Hum Hypertens 8:865–871

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Clarke WR et al (2001) Renoprotective effect of the angiotensin-receptor antagonist irbesartan in patient with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 345:851–860

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lonn EM, Bosch J, Lopez‑Jaramillo P, et al. for the HOPE-3 Investigators (2016) Blood-pressure lowering in intermediate-risk persons without cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1600175. [Epub ahead of print]

    Google Scholar 

  • Mancia G, Laurent S, Agabiti-Rosei E et al (2009) Reappraisal of European guidelines on hypertension management: a European Society of Hypertension Task Force document. J Hypertens 27:2121–2158

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mancia G, Kjeldsen SE, Zappe DH et al (2016) Cardiovascular outcomes at different on-treatment blood pressures in the hypertensive patients of the VALUE trial. Eur Heart J 37:955–964

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Messerli F, Mancia G, Conti R et al (2006) Dogma disputed: can aggressively lowering blood pressure in hypertensive patients with coronary artery disease be dangerous? Ann Intern Med 144:884–893

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Myers MG, Godwin M, Dawes M et al (2012) Conventional versus automated measurement of blood pressure in the office (CAMBO) trial. Fam Pract 29:376–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (2015) Landmark NIH study shows intensive blood pressure management may save lives. Available from http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/news/pressreleases/2015/landmark-nih-study-showsintensive-blood-pressure-management-may-save-lives.webpage. Accessed 11 Sept 2015

  • Neaton JD, Wentworth D (1992) Serum cholesterol, blood pressure, cigarette smoking, and death from coronary heart disease. Overall findings and differences by age for 316 099 white men. Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial Research Group. Arch Intern Med 152:56–64

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • New York Times (2015) Lower blood pressure guidelines could be “lifesaving”, federal study says. Available from http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/12/health/bloodpressure-study.html. Webpage accessed 8 Oct 2015

  • Nilsson PM (2016) Blood pressure strategies and goals in elderly patients with hypertension. Exp Gerontol. doi:10.1016/j.exger.2016.04.018 [Epub ahead of print]

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perkovic V, Rodgers A (2015) Redefining blood-pressure targets — SPRINT starts the marathon. N Engl J Med 373:2175–2178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson JC, Adler S, Burkart JM et al (1995) Blood pressure control, proteinuria and the progression of renal disease. Ann Intern Med 123:754–762

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pohl MA, Blumenthal S, Cordonnier DJ, et al. for the Collaborative Study Group (2005) Independent and additive impact of blood pressure control and angiotensin II receptor blockade on renal outcomes in the Irbesartan diabetic nephropathy trial: clinical implications and limitations. J Am Soc Nephrol 16:3027–3037

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose G (1980) Epidemiology. In: Marshall AJ, Barrett DW (eds) The hypertensive patient. Pitman Medical, Kent, pp 1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggenenti P, Perna A, Loriga G et al (2005) Blood-pressure control for renoprotection in patients with non-diabetic chronic renal disease (REIN-2): multicentre randomized controlled trial. Lancet 365:939–946

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schrier RW, Abebe KZ, Perron RD, et al. for the HALT-PKD Trial Investigators (2014) Blood pressure in early autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. N Engl J Med 371:2255–2266

    Google Scholar 

  • Sega R, Facchetti R, Bombelli M et al (2005) Prognostic value of ambulatory and home blood pressures compared with office blood pressure in the general population: follow-up results from the Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate e Loro Associazioni (PAMELA) study. Circulation 111:1777–1783

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SPRINT Research Group, Wright JT Jr, Williamson JD, Whelton PK et al (2015) A randomized trial of intensive versus standard blood-pressure control. N Engl J Med 373:2103–2116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taler SJ (2016) How does SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) direct hypertension treatment targets for CKD? Am J Kidney Dis. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.02.045. [Epub ahead of print]

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension and the European Society of Cardiology (2013) 2013 ESH/ESC practice Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. J Hypertens 31:1281–1357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The SPS3 Study Group (2013) Effects of blood pressure targets in patients with recent lacunar strokes. Lancet 382:507–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoma G, Nally JV, Pohl MA (2016) Interpreting SPRINT: how low should you go? Cleve Clin J Med 83:187–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomopoulosa C, Parati G, Zanchetti A (2014) Effects of blood pressure lowering on outcome incidence in hypertension: 2. Effects at different baseline and achieved blood pressure levels – overview and meta-analyses of randomized trials. J Hypertens 32:2296–2304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuomilehto J, Rastenyte D, Birkenhager WH et al (1999) Effects of calcium-channel blockade in older patients with diabetes and systolic hypertension. Systolic hypertension in Europe Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med 340:677–684

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vasan RS, Larson MG, Leip EP et al (2001) Impact of high-normal blood pressure on the risk of cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med 345:1291–1297

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verdecchia P, Reboldi G, Angeli F et al (2015) Systolic and diastolic blood pressure changes in relation with myocardial infarction and stroke in patients with coronary heart disease. Hypertension 65:108–114

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Xie X, Atkins E, Lv J et al (2016) Effects of intensive blood pressure lowering on cardiovascular and renal outcomes: updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 387:435–443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zanchetti A, Grassi G, Mancia G (2009) When should antihypertensive drug treatment be initiated and to what levels should systolic blood pressure be lowered? A critical reappraisal. J Hypertens 27:923–934

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zanchetti A, Liu L, Mancia G, ESH-CHL-SHOT trialinvestigators et al (2016) Continuation of the ESH-CHL-SHOT trial after publication of the SPRINT: rationale for further study on blood pressure targets of antihypertensive treatment after stroke. J Hypertens 34:393–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Faiçal Jarraya .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jarraya, F. (2016). Treatment of Hypertension: Which Goal for Which Patient?. In: Islam, M.S. (eds) Hypertension: from basic research to clinical practice. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology(), vol 956. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/5584_2016_97

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/5584_2016_97

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44250-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44251-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics