Abstract
We propose that mental representations of extrapersonal space are largely determined by the information that is required for actions within that space. Three different aspects of mental representations of space are briefly discussed. First, the physical size of a space restricts the set of behaviors that can be performed within the space. Mental representations of space therefore should differ in important respects depending on the perceived physical size of the referent space. Second, different reference systems can be used to code spatial information. Third, the demands on accuracy of representing spatial information differ between tasks. We posit that specialized mental representations are best suited to accomodate the different demands posed by actions within a given space. The benefit of different formats of mental representations, especially of analog representation, is addressed from a theoretical perspective. We argue that although different representational systems can be constructed that possess similar behavioral characteristics, analog representations in some cases lend themselves to more directly testable predicitions than other representations.
We wish to thank Jörn Diedrichsen, Gerhard Strube and Nicole Wellman for their helpful comments on earlier versions of this article. We also thank Jörn Diedrichsen, Jörg Gehrke, Friederike Lux, Meret Neumann and Stefanie Wolf for their help in conducting the studies reported herein. This work was funded by a grant by the German Research Foundation (We 1973/3-1).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aglioti, S., Goodale, M.A., & DeSouza, J.F.X. (1995). Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Curr. Biology, 5, 679–85.
Anderson, J.R. (1978). Arguments concerning representations for mental imagery. Psychological Review, 85, 249–277.
Berthoz, A. (1991). Reference frames for the perception and control of movement. In J. Paillard (Ed.), Brain and Space (pp. 81–111). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Boer, L.C. (1991). Mental rotation in perspective problems. Acta Psychologica, 76, 1–9.
Block, N. (1981). Imagery. Cambridge: MIT-Press.
Bryant, D.J. & Tversky, B. (1992). Assessing spatial frameworks with object and direction probes. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30, 29–32.
Claus, B., Eyferth, K., Gips, C., Hörnig, R., Schmid, U., Wiebrock, S., & Wysotzki, F. (this volume). Reference frames for spatial inference in text understanding.
Easton, R.D. & Sholl, M.J. (1995). Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 483–500.
Elliott, D. & Madalena, J. (1987). The influence of premovement visual information on manual aiming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39 A, 541–559.
Franklin, N. & Tversky, B. (1990). Searching imagined environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 63–76.
Funt. B.V. (1980). Problem-solving with diagrammatic representations. Artificial Intelligence, 13, 201–230.
Gardin, F. & Meltzer, B. (1989). Analogical representation of naive physics. Artificial Intelligence, 38, 139–170.
Georgopoulos, A.P. & Pellizzer, G. (1995). The mental and the neural: Psychological and neural studies of mental rotation and memory scanning. Neuropsychologia, 33, 1531–1547.
Georgopoulos, A.P., Lurito, J.T., Petrides, M., Schwartz, A.B., & Massey, J.T. (1989). Mental rotation of the neuronal population vector. Science, 243, 234–236.
Gibson, J.J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Gigerenzer, G. (1988). Woher kommen Theorien über kognitive Prozesse? Psychologische Rundschau, 39, 91–100.
Glasgow, J. & Papadias, D. (1992). Computational imagery. Cognitive Science, 16, 355–394.
Goodale, M.A., Milner, A.D., Jakobson, L.S., & Carey, D.P. (1991). A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them. Nature, 349, 154–156.
Graziano, M.S.A. & Gross, C.G. (1995). The representation of extrapersonal space: A possible role for bimodal, visual-tactive neurons. In M.S. Gazzaniga, (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 1021–1034). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Grüsser, O.-J. (1983). Multimodal structure of the extrapersonal space. In A. Hein & M. Jeannerod (Eds.), Spatially oriented behavior (pp. 327–352). New York: Springer.
Hintzman, D.L., O’Dell, C.S., & Arndt, D.R. (1981). Orientation in cognitive maps. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 149–206.
Hirtle, S.C. & Jonides, J. (1985). Evidence of hierarchies in cognitive maps. Memory and Cognition, 13, 208–217.
Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L.V., & Duncan, S. (1991). Categories and particulars: Prototype effects in estimating spatial location. Psychological Review, 98, 352–376.
Kosslyn, S.M. & Pomerantz, J.R. (1977). Imagery, propositions, and the form of internal representations. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 52–76.
Kosslyn, S.M. (1980). Image and mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Kosslyn, S.M. (1994). Image and brain. Cambridge. MIT-Press.
Krieg-Brückner, G., Röfer, T., Carmesin, H.-O., & Müller, R. (this volume). A taxonomy of spatial knowledge for navigation and its application to the Bremen autonomous wheelchair.
Kuipers, B. (1982). The “map in the head” metaphor. Environment and Behavior, 14, 202–220.
Loomis, J.M., Da Silva, J.A., Fujita, N., & Fukusima, S.S. (1992). Visual space perception and visually directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 906–921.
Lüer, G., Werner, S. & Lass, U. (1995). Repräsentation analogen Wissens im Gedächtnis. In E. van der Meer and D. Dörner (Hrsg.), Das Gedächtnis. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
McDonald, T.P. & Pellegrino, J.W. (1993). Psychological perspectives on spatial cognition. In T. Gärling & R.G. Golledge (Eds.), Behavior and environment: Psychological and geographical approaches. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
McNamara, T.P., Hardy, J.K., & Hirtle, S.C. (1989). Subjective hierarchies in spatial memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 211–227.
Milner, A.D. & Goodale, M.A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Montello, D.R. (1993). Scale and multipe psychologies of space. In A.U. Frank & I. Campari (Eds.), Spatial information theory: A theoretical basis for GIS (pp. 312–321). Berlin: Springer.
O’Regan, J.K. (1992). Solving the real mysteries of visual perception: The world as an outside memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 461–488.
Palmer, S.E. (1978). Fundamental Aspects of cognitive representation. E. Rosch & B.B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 259–303). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Poucet, B. (1993). Spatial cognitive maps in animals: New hypotheses on their structure and neural mechanisms. Psychological Review, 100, 163–182.
Presson, C.C. & Hazelrigg, M.D. (1984). Building spatial representations through primary and secondary learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 723–732.
Presson, C.C., DeLange, N., & Hazelrigg, M.D. (1989). Orientation specificity in spatial memory: What makes a path different from a map of the path? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 887–897.
Pylyshyn, Z.W. (1979). Validating computational models: A critique of Anderson’s indeterminacy of representation claim. Psychological Review, 86, 383–394.
Rieser, J.J. (1989). Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1157–1165.
Rieser, J.J., Ashmead, D.H., Talor, C.R., & Youngquist, G.A. (1990). Visual pereption and the guidance of locomotion without vision to previously seen targets. Perception, 19, 675–689.
Sadalla, E.K., Burroughs, W.J., & Staplin, L.J. (1980). Reference points in spatial cognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 516–528.
Schölkopf, B. & Mallot, H.A. (1995). View-based cognitive mapping and path planning. Adaptive Behavior, 3, 311–348.
Shelton, A.L. & McNamara, T.P. (1997). Multiple views of spatial memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 102–104.
Shepard, R.N. & Cooper, L.A. (1982). Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge: MIT-Press.
Shepard, R.N. & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701–703.
Sholl, M.J. & Nolin, T.L. (in press). Orientation specificity in representations of place. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.
Sholl, M.J. (1987). Cognitive maps as orienting schemata. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 615–628.
Sholl, M.J. (1995). The representation and retrieval of map and environment knowledge. Geographical Systems, 2, 177–195.
Siegel, A.W. & White, S.H. (1975). The development of spatial representations of largescale environments. In H.W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 10). New York: Plenum Press.
Siegel, A.W. (1981). The externalization of cognitive maps by children and adults: In search of ways to ask better questions. In L.S. Liben, A. Patterson, & N. Newcombe (Eds.), Spatial representations and behavior across the life span: Theory and application (pp. 167–194). New York: Academic.
Sloman, A. (1985). Why we need many knowledge representation formalisms. In M. Bramer (Ed.), Research and development in expert systems (pp. 163–183). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sloman, A. (1995). Musings on the roles of logical and nonlogical representations in intelligence. In J. Glasgow, N.H. Narayanan, & B. Chandrasekaran (Eds.), Diagrammatic reasoning: Cognitive and computational perspectives (pp. 7–32). Cambridge: MIT-Press.
Stevens, A. & Coupe, P. (1978). Distortions in judged spatial relations. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 422–437.
Thomson, J.A. (1983). Is continuous visual monitoring necessary in visually guided locomotion? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 427–443.
Tversky, B. (1981). Distortions in memory for maps. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 407–433.
v. Wolff, A. (1997). Der Einfluß von Raumachsen auf das egozentrische Umraummodell. In W. Krause, U. Kotkamp, & R. Goertz (Eds.), KogWis97: Proceedings der 3. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Kognitionswissenschaft (241–243). Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena.
Werner, S., Krieg-Brückner, B., Mallot, H.A., Schweizer, K. & Freksa, C. (1997). Spatial cognition: The role of landmark, route, and survey knowledge in human and robot navigation. In M. Jarke, K. Pasedach, & K. Pohl (Eds.), Informatik’ 97 (41–50). Berlin: Springer.
Werner, S. & Wolf, S. (in preparation). The effects of egocentric and allocentric frames of reference on the mental representation of extrapersonal space.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Werner, S., Saade, C., Lüer, G. (1998). Relations between the mental representation of extrapersonal space and spatial behavior. In: Freksa, C., Habel, C., Wender, K.F. (eds) Spatial Cognition. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1404. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-69342-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-69342-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-64603-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69342-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive