Skip to main content

APPEAL: A multi-agent approach to interactive learning environments

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Distributed Software Agents and Applications (MAAMAW 1994)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1069))

Abstract

In this paper an agent-based approach to interactive learning environments (ILE) is proposed. It is argued that current interactive learning systems, especially the intelligent tutoring systems, do not satisfy the minimal requirements of an ILE. A specification is given of an agent-based approach to ILE in which situated agents are associated with different aspects of the teacher's behaviour. It is argued that the interaction between these teacher agents and the student agent results in a highly adaptive and interactive learning system that satisfies the requirements of an ILE.The most promising is perhaps that the behaviour of the teacher seems already fairly complex even with a very limited amount of simple behaviours of the agents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agre, P.E., & Chapman, D. (1987). Pengi: An implementation of a theory of activity. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference (pp. 268–272). Seattle, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hoe, R., Masthoff, J., Appelo, L., Harkema, H., De Pijper, J.R., & Rous, J. (1995). APPEAL: a multimedia environment for adaptive learning. In: IPO annual progress report 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appelo, L., Leermakers, M., & Rous, J. (1994). Language exercise generation in an interactive learning environment. IPO Manuscript 1012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouwhuis, D., & Bunt, H. (in press). Interactive instructional systems as dialogue systems. In L. Verhoeven (Ed.), Training for literacy. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R. (1986). A robust layered control system for a mobile robot. IEEE Journal on Robotics and Automation, 2, 14–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R. (1991). Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence, 47, 139–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbonell, J.R. (1970). Mixed initiative man-computer instructional dialogues. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, D. (1991). Vision, instruction, and action. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connah, D.M. (1993). The design of interacting agents for use in interfaces. In M.D. Brouwer-Janse & T.L. Harrington (Eds.), Human-machine communication for educational systems design (pp. 197–206). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, J.G., Chi, M.T.H., Clancey, W.J., & Elman, J. (Eds.) (1993). Situated Agents [Special issue]. Cognitive Science, 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • McArthur, D., Statz, C., Hotta, J., Peter, O., & Burdorf, C. (1988). Skill-oriented task-sequencing in an intelligent tutor for basic algebra. Instructional Science, 17, 281–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D.A. (1981). Categorization of Action Slips. Psychological Review, 88, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D.A., & Draper, S.W. (Eds.) (1986). User centered system design. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, S., & Squibb, H. (1990). Algebra mal-rules and cognitive accounts of error. Cognitive Science, 14, 445–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roschelle, J. (1990). Designing for conversations. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Self, J.A. (1974). Student models in computer-aided instruction. International Journal of Man-Machine studies, 6, 261–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Shea, T. (1979). A self-improving quadratic tutor. International Journal of Man-Machine studies, 11, 97–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoham, Y. (1993). Agent-oriented programming. Artificial Intelligence, 60, 51–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, R.E., & Swanson, J. (1992). Instructional psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 583–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L.A. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steels, L. (1989). Cooperation between distributed agents through self-organisation. Journal on Robotics and Autonomous systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wavish, P.R., & Connah, D.M. (1990). Representing multi-agent worlds in ABLE. Technical Note, Philips Research Laboratories.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D., Wood, H., & Middleton, D. (1978). An experimental evaluation of four face-to-face teaching strategies. International Journal of behavioral Development, 1, 131–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1987). Artificial Intelligence and Tutoring Systems. Los Altos, California: Morgan Kaufmann

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

John W. Perram Jean-Pierre Müller

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Masthoff, J., van Hoe, R. (1996). APPEAL: A multi-agent approach to interactive learning environments. In: Perram, J.W., Müller, JP. (eds) Distributed Software Agents and Applications. MAAMAW 1994. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1069. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61157-6_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61157-6_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-61157-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68335-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics