Skip to main content

Co-evolutionary constraint satisfaction

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Parallel Problem Solving from Nature — PPSN III (PPSN 1994)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 866))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper introduces CCS, a Co-evolutionary approach to Constraint Satisfaction. Two types of objects — constraints and solutions — interact in a way modelled after predator and prey relations in nature. It is shown that co-evolution considerably focuses the genetic search. In addition, the new technique of life-time fitness evaluation (LTFE) is introduced. Its partial but continuous nature allows for efficient fitness evaluation. Moreover, co-evolution and LTFE nicely complement each other. Hence, their combined use further improves the performance of the evolutionary search.

CCS also provides a new perspective on the problems associated with high degrees of epistasis and the use of penalty functions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Davis, L., (1988), Applying Adaptive Algorithms to Epistatic Domains, Proc. IJCAI-88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillis, W.D., (1992), Co-evolving Parasites Improve Simulated Evolution as an Optimization Procedure, in Artificial Life II, Langton, C.G.; Taylor, C.; Farmer, J.D., and Rasmussen, S., (eds), Addison-Wesley, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mühlenbein, H., (1992), Parallel Genetic Algorithms in Combinatorial Optimization, Proc. Computer Science and Operations Research: New Developments in Their Interfaces, ORSA, Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paredis, J., (1993), Genetic State-Space Search for Constrained Optimization Problems, Proc. Thirteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 93), Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paredis, J., (1994a), Steps towards Co-evolutionary Classification Neural Networks, Proc. Artificial Life IV, R. Brooks, P. Maes (eds), MIT Press / Bradford Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paredis, J., (1994b), The Symbiotic Evolution of Solutions and their Representation, (in preparation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J.T.; Palmer, M.R.; Liepins, G.; Hilliard M., (1989), Some Guidelines for Genetic Algorithms with Penalty Functions. Proc. Third Int. Conf. on Genetic Algorithms, Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, D., (1989a), The Genitor Algorithm and Selection Pressure: Why Rank-Based Allocation of Reproductive Trails is Best. Proc. Third Int. Conf. on Genetic Algorithms, Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, D., (1989b), Optimizing Neural Networks using Faster, more Accurate Genetic Search. Proc. Third Int. Conf. on Genetic Algorithms, Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Yuval Davidor Hans-Paul Schwefel Reinhard Männer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Paredis, J. (1994). Co-evolutionary constraint satisfaction. In: Davidor, Y., Schwefel, HP., Männer, R. (eds) Parallel Problem Solving from Nature — PPSN III. PPSN 1994. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 866. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58484-6_249

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58484-6_249

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-58484-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49001-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics