Skip to main content

Belief revision: A vade-mecum

  • Invited Papers
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Meta-Programming in Logic (META 1992)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 649))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper contains a brief survey of the area of belief revision and its relation to updating of logical databases as it has developed during the last years. A set of rationality postulates for revisions are presented. A couple of semi-algorithmic models of revision and updating are introduced. The models are connected to the postulates via some representation theorems. Finally, the relation between belief revision and nonmonotonic logic is explored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alchourrón, C.E., P. Gärdenfors, and D. Makinson (1985): “On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions”, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 50, 510–530.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fuhrmann, A. (1991): “Theory contraction through base contraction” Journal of Philosophical Logic 20, 175–203.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gabbay, D. (1985): “Theoretical foundations for nonmonotonic reasoning in expert systems”, in Logic and Models of Concurrent Systems, K. Apt ed. (Berlin: Springer-Verlag).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gärdenfors P. (1988): Knowledge in Flux: Modeling the Dynamics of Epistemic States (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, Bradford Books).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gärdenfors, P. and D. Makinson. (1988): “Revisions of knowledge systems using epistemic entrenchment”, in Proceedings of the Second Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Knowledge, M. Vardi ed. (Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gärdenfors, P. and D. Makinson. (1992): “Nonmonotonic inferences based on expectations”, manuscript, Cognitive Science, Lund University.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kraus, S., D. Lehmann, and M. Magidor, (1990): “Nonmonotonic reasoning, preferential models and cumulative logics”, Artificial Intelligence 44, 167–207.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Makinson, D. (1991): “General patterns in nonmonotonic reasoning”, to appear as chapter 2 of Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming, Volume II: Non-Monotonic and Uncertain Reasoning. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Makinson, D. and P. Gärdenfors (1991): “Relations between the logic of theory change and nonmonotonic logic”, The Logic of Theory Change, ed. by A. Fuhrmann and M. Morreau (Berlin: Springer-Verlag), 185–205.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pearl, J. (1988): Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems (Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Poole, D. (1988): “A logical framework for default reasoning”, Artificial Intelligence 36, 27–47.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Reiter R. (1980): “A logic for default reasoning”, Artificial Intelligence 13, 81–132.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shoham, Y. (1988): Reasoning about Change. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

A. Pettorossi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gärdenfors, P. (1992). Belief revision: A vade-mecum. In: Pettorossi, A. (eds) Meta-Programming in Logic. META 1992. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 649. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-56282-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-56282-6_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-56282-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47505-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics