Skip to main content

Predictive analogy and cognition

  • Submitted Papers
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Analogical and Inductive Inference (AII 1992)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 642))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The most prevalent sense of ‘analogy’ in cognitive science and AI literature, which I refer to as predictive analogy, is the process of inferring further similarities between two given situations based on some existing similarities. Though attempts to validate predictive analogy on logical grounds have been singularly unsuccessful, it is claimed that all the empirical evidence points to the usefulness of predictive analogy in cognition. In this article I critically analyze this claim. I argue that the classroom experiments by cognitive psychologists to demonstrate predictive analogy as a problem-solving heuristic do not really do so. Moreover, the few studies of real-world problem-solving situations definitely point away from predictive analogy. I present some examples where predictive analogy prevents one from seeing things as they are, thereby hindering cognition. Having exposed its ‘dark side’, I argue for a balanced perspective where predictive analogy is best seen as a psychological process that is as likely to be a liability as an asset to cognition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allwood C.M. and Eliasson M., 1987, “Analogy and Other Sources of Difficulty in Novices' Very First Text-Editing,” International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 27, pp. 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andersen M., 1967, “An Impression,” in S. Rozental (ed.) Niels Bohr: His life and work as seen by his friends and colleagues, North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 321–324.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clement C.A. and Gentner D., 1991, “Systematicity as a Selectional Constraint in Analogical Mapping,” Cognitive Science 15, pp. 89–132.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Feynman R., 1986, “Personal Observations on the Reliability of the Shuttle” by Richard Feynman, Appendix F to the Report to the President by the Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident, Washington D.C. (1986); reprinted in What do you care what other people think? by Richard Feynman, W.W. Norton and Co. (1988), New York, pp. 220–237.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Galbraith J.K., 1991, “Recession: Parallels With the 30s,” The Boston Globe, December 17, 1991, p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gentner D., 1983, “Structure-Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy,” Cognitive Science 7, pp. 155–170.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gentner D., 1989, “The Mechanisms of Analogical Learning,” in S. Vosniadou and A. Ortony (eds.) Similarity and Analogical Reasoning, Cambridge University Press, London, U.K., pp. 199–241.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gentner D. and Jeziorski M., 1989, “Historical Shifts in the Use of Analogy in Science,” in B. Gholson et al. (eds.) The Psychology of Science: Contributions to Metascience, Cambridge University Press, London, U.K. pp. 296–325.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gick M.L. and Holyoak K.J., 1980, “Analogical Problem Solving,” Cognitive Psychology 12, pp. 306–355.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gick M.L. and Holyoak K.J., 1983, “Schema Induction and Analogical Transfer,” Cognitive Psychology 15, pp. 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gordon W.J.J., 1961, Synectics: The Development of Creative Capacity, Harper and Row, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gruber H.E., 1978, “Darwin's ‘Tree of Nature’ and Other Images of Wide Scope,” in J. Wechsler (ed.) On Aesthetics in Science, MIT Press (1978), Cambridge, Mass., pp. 121–40.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Halasz F. and Moran T.P., 1982, “Analogies Considered Harmful,” ACM Proc. of Human Factors in Computer Systems, pp. 383–386.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hart C., 1985, The Prehistory of Flight, University of California Press, Berkeley, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Indurkhya B., 1989, “Modes of Analogy,” in K. P. Jantke (ed.) Analogical and Inductive Inference, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 397, Springer-Verlag (1989), Berlin, GDR, pp. 217–230.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Indurkhya B., 1990, “On the Role of Interpretive Analogy in Learning,” Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Algorithmic Learning Theory, Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 174–189; reprinted in New Generation Computing 8, (1991), pp. 385–402.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Indurkhya B., 1992, Metaphor and Cognition: An Interactionist Approach, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Koestler A., 1964, The Act of Creation, Hutchinsons of London; 2nd Danube ed., 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kolers P.A., 1972, Aspects of Motion Perception, Pergamon Press, Oxford, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Miller A.I., 1978, “Visualization Lost and Regained: The Genesis of the Quantum Theory in the Period 1913–27,” in J. Wechsler (ed.) On Aesthetics in Science, MIT Press (1978), Cambridge, Mass., pp. 73–102.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Miller R.M., 1976, “The Dubious Case for Metaphors in Educational Writing,” Educational Theory 26, (Spring 1976), pp. 174–181.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Newman J.R., 1956, The World of Mathematics, Volume 2, Simon and Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Popper K.R., 1959, The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Hutchinson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Popper K.R., 1962, Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, Basic Books, New York; 2nd ed. 1965; Harper and Row: 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Robbins J., 1991, “Echoes of 1939 on Capitol Hill,” Wall Street Journal, January 14, 1991, p. A12.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Schön D.A., 1963, Displacement of Concepts, Humanities Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shurkin J., 1984, Engines of the Mind: A History of the Computer, W.W. Norton and Co., New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Stillman J.M., 1924, The Story of Early Chemistry, D. Appleton and Company, New York, NY; republished as The Story of Alchemy and Early Chemistry, Dover Publications (1960), New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Weitzenfeld J.S., 1984, “Valid Reasoning by Analogy,” Philosophy of Science 51, pp. 137–149.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Weizenbaum J., 1976, Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgment to Calculation, W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Klaus P. Jantke

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Indurkhya, B. (1992). Predictive analogy and cognition. In: Jantke, K.P. (eds) Analogical and Inductive Inference. AII 1992. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 642. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-56004-1_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-56004-1_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-56004-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47339-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics