Abstract
The most prevalent sense of ‘analogy’ in cognitive science and AI literature, which I refer to as predictive analogy, is the process of inferring further similarities between two given situations based on some existing similarities. Though attempts to validate predictive analogy on logical grounds have been singularly unsuccessful, it is claimed that all the empirical evidence points to the usefulness of predictive analogy in cognition. In this article I critically analyze this claim. I argue that the classroom experiments by cognitive psychologists to demonstrate predictive analogy as a problem-solving heuristic do not really do so. Moreover, the few studies of real-world problem-solving situations definitely point away from predictive analogy. I present some examples where predictive analogy prevents one from seeing things as they are, thereby hindering cognition. Having exposed its ‘dark side’, I argue for a balanced perspective where predictive analogy is best seen as a psychological process that is as likely to be a liability as an asset to cognition.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allwood C.M. and Eliasson M., 1987, “Analogy and Other Sources of Difficulty in Novices' Very First Text-Editing,” International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 27, pp. 1–22.
Andersen M., 1967, “An Impression,” in S. Rozental (ed.) Niels Bohr: His life and work as seen by his friends and colleagues, North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 321–324.
Clement C.A. and Gentner D., 1991, “Systematicity as a Selectional Constraint in Analogical Mapping,” Cognitive Science 15, pp. 89–132.
Feynman R., 1986, “Personal Observations on the Reliability of the Shuttle” by Richard Feynman, Appendix F to the Report to the President by the Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident, Washington D.C. (1986); reprinted in What do you care what other people think? by Richard Feynman, W.W. Norton and Co. (1988), New York, pp. 220–237.
Galbraith J.K., 1991, “Recession: Parallels With the 30s,” The Boston Globe, December 17, 1991, p. 23.
Gentner D., 1983, “Structure-Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy,” Cognitive Science 7, pp. 155–170.
Gentner D., 1989, “The Mechanisms of Analogical Learning,” in S. Vosniadou and A. Ortony (eds.) Similarity and Analogical Reasoning, Cambridge University Press, London, U.K., pp. 199–241.
Gentner D. and Jeziorski M., 1989, “Historical Shifts in the Use of Analogy in Science,” in B. Gholson et al. (eds.) The Psychology of Science: Contributions to Metascience, Cambridge University Press, London, U.K. pp. 296–325.
Gick M.L. and Holyoak K.J., 1980, “Analogical Problem Solving,” Cognitive Psychology 12, pp. 306–355.
Gick M.L. and Holyoak K.J., 1983, “Schema Induction and Analogical Transfer,” Cognitive Psychology 15, pp. 1–38.
Gordon W.J.J., 1961, Synectics: The Development of Creative Capacity, Harper and Row, New York, NY.
Gruber H.E., 1978, “Darwin's ‘Tree of Nature’ and Other Images of Wide Scope,” in J. Wechsler (ed.) On Aesthetics in Science, MIT Press (1978), Cambridge, Mass., pp. 121–40.
Halasz F. and Moran T.P., 1982, “Analogies Considered Harmful,” ACM Proc. of Human Factors in Computer Systems, pp. 383–386.
Hart C., 1985, The Prehistory of Flight, University of California Press, Berkeley, Calif.
Indurkhya B., 1989, “Modes of Analogy,” in K. P. Jantke (ed.) Analogical and Inductive Inference, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 397, Springer-Verlag (1989), Berlin, GDR, pp. 217–230.
Indurkhya B., 1990, “On the Role of Interpretive Analogy in Learning,” Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Algorithmic Learning Theory, Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 174–189; reprinted in New Generation Computing 8, (1991), pp. 385–402.
Indurkhya B., 1992, Metaphor and Cognition: An Interactionist Approach, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Koestler A., 1964, The Act of Creation, Hutchinsons of London; 2nd Danube ed., 1976.
Kolers P.A., 1972, Aspects of Motion Perception, Pergamon Press, Oxford, U.K.
Miller A.I., 1978, “Visualization Lost and Regained: The Genesis of the Quantum Theory in the Period 1913–27,” in J. Wechsler (ed.) On Aesthetics in Science, MIT Press (1978), Cambridge, Mass., pp. 73–102.
Miller R.M., 1976, “The Dubious Case for Metaphors in Educational Writing,” Educational Theory 26, (Spring 1976), pp. 174–181.
Newman J.R., 1956, The World of Mathematics, Volume 2, Simon and Schuster, New York.
Popper K.R., 1959, The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Hutchinson, London.
Popper K.R., 1962, Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, Basic Books, New York; 2nd ed. 1965; Harper and Row: 1968.
Robbins J., 1991, “Echoes of 1939 on Capitol Hill,” Wall Street Journal, January 14, 1991, p. A12.
Schön D.A., 1963, Displacement of Concepts, Humanities Press, New York, NY.
Shurkin J., 1984, Engines of the Mind: A History of the Computer, W.W. Norton and Co., New York, NY.
Stillman J.M., 1924, The Story of Early Chemistry, D. Appleton and Company, New York, NY; republished as The Story of Alchemy and Early Chemistry, Dover Publications (1960), New York, NY.
Weitzenfeld J.S., 1984, “Valid Reasoning by Analogy,” Philosophy of Science 51, pp. 137–149.
Weizenbaum J., 1976, Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgment to Calculation, W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, NY.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1992 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Indurkhya, B. (1992). Predictive analogy and cognition. In: Jantke, K.P. (eds) Analogical and Inductive Inference. AII 1992. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 642. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-56004-1_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-56004-1_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-56004-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47339-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive