Abstract
This paper investigates Walley’s concepts of irrelevance and independence, as applied to the theory of closed convex sets of probability measures. Walley’s concepts are analyzed from the perspective of axioms for conditional independence (the so-called semi-graphoid axioms). Two new results are demonstrated in discrete models: first, Walley’s concept of irrelevance is an asymmetric semi-graphoid; second, Walley’s concept of independence is an incomplete semi-graphoid. These results are the basis for an understanding of irrelevance and independence in connection to the theory of closed convex sets of probability measures, a theory that has received attention as a powerful representation for uncertainty in beliefs and preferences.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. Berger and E. Moreno. Bayesian robustness in bidimensional model: Prior independence. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 40:161–176, 1994.
J. O. Berger. Robust Bayesian analysis: Sensitivity to the prior. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 25:303–328, 1990.
L. Chrisman. Independence with lower and upper probabilities. XII Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence Conference, pages 169–177, 1996.
A. P. Dawid. Conditional Independence. To appear, Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences, Update Volume 3, Wiley, New York, 1999.
A. P. Dawid and M. Studený. Conditional Products: An Alternative Approach to Conditional Independence. Uncertainty99: The Seventh International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 1999.
L. de Campos and S. Moral. Independence concepts for convex sets of probabilities. XI Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 108–115, 1995.
F. J. Giron and S. Rios. Quasi-Bayesian behaviour: A more realistic approach to decision making? In J. M. Bernardo, J. H. DeGroot, D. V. Lindley, and A. F. M. Smith, editors, Bayesian Statistics, pages 17–38. University Press, Valencia, Spain, 1980.
J. B. Kadane. Robustness of Bayesian Analyses, volume 4 of Studies in Bayesian econometrics. Elsevier Science Pub. Co., New York, 1984.
H. E. Kyburg and M. Pittarelli. Set-based Bayesianism. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics A, 26(3):324–339, May 1996.
I. Levi. The Enterprise of Knowledge. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1980.
J. Pearl. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. Morgan Kauffman, San Mateo, CA, 1988.
P. Walley. Statistical Reasoning with Imprecise Probabilities. Chapman and Hall, New York, 1991.
P. Walley and T. L. Fine. Towards a frequentist theory of upper and lower probability. The Annals of Statistics, 10(3):741–761, 1982.
L. Wasserman. Recent methodological advances in robust Bayesian inference. In J. M. Bernardo, J. O. Berger, A. P. Dawid, and A. F. M. Smith, editors, Bayesian Statistics 4, pages 483–502. Oxford University Press, 1992.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Cozman, F.G. (1999). Irrelevance and Independence Axioms in Quasi-Bayesian Theory. In: Hunter, A., Parsons, S. (eds) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty. ECSQARU 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1638. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48747-6_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48747-6_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66131-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48747-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive