Skip to main content

Many-Valued Logics and Holographic Proofs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Automata, Languages and Programming

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1644))

Abstract

We reformulate the subject of holographic proof checking in terms of three-valued logic. In this reformulation the recursive proof checking idea of Arora and Safra gets an especially elegant form. Our approach gives a more concise and accurate treatment of the holographic proof theory, and yields easy to check proofs about holographic proofs. A consequence of our results is that for any > 0 MAX3SAT instances cannot be approximated in TIME(2n1- ) within a factor which tends to 1 when n tends to infinity, unless 3SAT can be solved in TIME(2n1-) for some > 0.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S. Arora and C. Lund, Hardness of approximations. In Approximation Algorithms for NP-hard problems, D. Hochbaum, ed. PWS Publishing, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Arora, C, Lund, R. Motwani, M. Sudan, and M. Szegedy, Proof verification and the intractability of approximation problems. Proceedings of the 33rd Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, IEEE 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Arora and S. Safra. Probabilistic checking of proofs: a new characterization of NP. To appear Journal of the ACM. Preliminary version in Proceedings of the Thirty Third Annual Symposium on the Foundations of Computer Science, IEEE, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. Babai, L. Fortnow, and C. Lund, Non-deterministic exponential time has two-prover interactive protocols. Computational Complexity, 1:3–40, 1991.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. L. Babai, L. Fortnow, L. Levin, and M. Szegedy, Checking computations in polylogarithmic time. Proceedings of the Twenty Third Annual Symposium on the Theory of Computing, ACM, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  6. L. Babai and K. Friedl, On slightly superlinear transparent proofs. Univ. Chicago Tech. Report, CS-93-13, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  7. U. Feige, S. Goldwasser, L. Lovász, S. Safra, and M. Szegedy, Interactive proofs and the hardness of approximating cliques. Journal of the ACM, 43(2):268–292, March 1996.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. L. Fortnow, J. Rompel, and M. Sipser, On the power of multi-prover interactive protocols. Theoretical Computer Science, 134(2):545–557, November 1994.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. S. Goldwasser, S. Micali, and C. Rackoff, The knowledge complexity of interactive proof-systems. SIAM J. on Computing, 18(1):186–208, February 1989.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Polishchuk and D. Spielman, Nearly Linear Sized Holographic Proofs. Proceedings of the Twenty Sixth Annual Symposium on the Theory of Computing, ACM, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Raz, A parallel repetition theorem. Proceedings of the Twenty Seventh Annual Symposium on the Theory of Computing, ACM, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Sudan, Efficient Checking of Polynomials and Proofs and the Hardness of Approximation Problems. Ph.D. Thesis, U.C. Berkeley, 1992. Also appears as ACM Distinguished Theses, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, no. 1001, Springer, 1996.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Szegedy, M. (1999). Many-Valued Logics and Holographic Proofs. In: Wiedermann, J., van Emde Boas, P., Nielsen, M. (eds) Automata, Languages and Programming. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1644. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48523-6_64

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48523-6_64

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66224-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48523-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics