Abstract
The investigation reported here is part of a project to design navigational aids for the Paris subway system. Users of the subway were asked to describe the route to be followed from the platforms of subway stations to specific buildings in the city of Paris. The descriptions thus included two parts: one underground (from the train platform to the exit) and the other in the urban environment (from the exit to the building). Most studies of route directions have been conducted in open environments (campus, city, etc.). The aim here was to contrast the types of description specific to the two contexts. Forty-eight participants (24 male, 24 female) took part in the experiment. Verbal descriptions were analyzed using the procedure proposed by Denis (1997). The results showed that participants relied extensively on signs for the underground part of the route. This was true for subway stations displaying either newly designed or older signs. The paths were rarely referred to in the subway environment, but they were frequently used in the urban environment. The patterns of landmark distribution along the routes were similar in both environments, in that they were more frequent at the nodes where reorientation was needed.
This research was conducted with the support of the RATP (Régie Autonome des Transports Parisiens).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Chown, E., Kaplan, S., & Kortenkamp, D. (1995), Prototypes, location and associative networks (PLAN): Towards a unified theory of cognitive mapping. Cognitive Science, 19, 1–51.
Denis, M. (1997), The description of routes: A cognitive approach to the production of spatial discourse. Current Psychology of Cognition, 16, 409–458.
Denis, M., Pazzaglia, F., Cornoldi, C., & Bertolo, L. (in press). Spatial discourse and navigation: An analysis of route directions in the city of Venice. Applied Cognitive Psychology.
De Vega, M., Rodrigo, M.J., & Zimmer, H.D. (1996), Pointing and labelling directions in egocentric frameworks. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 821–839.
Galea, L. A. M., & Kimura, D. (1993), Sex differences in route learning. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 53–65.
Gapp, K.-P., & Maass, W. (1994), Spatial layout identification and incremental description. Proceedings of the Twelfth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-94), Workshop “Integration of Natural Language and Vision Processing” (pp. 145–152), Seattle, WA, August 1994.
Glasgow, J. I., & Papadias, D. (1992), Computational imagery. Cognitive Science, 16, 355–394.
Gryl, A. (1995), et modé des processus discursifs mis en oeuvre dans la description d’itéraires. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Université de Paris-Sud, Orsay.
Klein,. (1982), Local deixis in route directions. In R. J. Jarvella & W. Klein (Eds.), Speech, place, and action (pp. 161–182). Chichester: Wiley.
McNeill, D. (1992), Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Montello, D. R., & Pick, H. L., Jr. (1993), Integrating knowledge of vertically aligned large-scale spaces. Environment and Behavior, 25, 457–484.
Pearce, P. L. (1981), Route maps: A study of travellers’ perceptions of a section of countryside. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 1, 141–155.
Shanon, B. (1984), Room descriptions. Discourse Processes, 7, 225–255.
Taylor, H. A., & Tversky, B. (1992), Spatial mental models derived from survey and route descriptions. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 261–292.
Tversky, B. (1995), Cognitive origins of graphic productions. In F. T. Marchese (Ed.), Understanding images: Finding meaning in digital imagery (pp. 29–53). New-York: Springer-Verlag.
Wright, P., Lickorish, A., Hull, A., & Ummelen, N. (1995), Graphics in written directions: Appreciated by readers but not writers. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 41–59.
Wunderlich, D., & Reinelt, R. (1982), How to get there from here. In R. J. Jarvella & W. Klein (Eds.), Speech, place, and action (pp. 183–201). Chichester: Wiley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fontaine, S., Denis, M. (1999). The Production of Route Instructions in Underground and Urban Environments. In: Freksa, C., Mark, D.M. (eds) Spatial Information Theory. Cognitive and Computational Foundations of Geographic Information Science. COSIT 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1661. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48384-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48384-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66365-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48384-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive