Abstract
Traditionally, depictions and descriptions have been seen as complementary; depictions have been preferred to convey iconic or metaphorically iconic information whereas descriptions have been preferred for abstract information. Both are external representations designed to complement human memory and information processing. We have found the same underlying structure and semantics for route maps and route directions. Here we find that limited schematic map and direction toolkits are sufficient for constructing directions, supporting the possibility of automatic translation between them.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Clark, H. H. (1992), Arenas of language use. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Denis, M. (1997), The description of routes: A cognitive approach to the production of spatial discourse. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 16, 409–458.
Denis, M. and Briffault, X. (1997), Les aides verbales a l’orientation spatiale. In M. Denis (Editor), Langue et Cognition Spatiale.Paris: Masson.
Denis, M. Pazzaglia, F., Cornoldi, C., & Bertolo, L. (1998), Spatial discourse and navigation: An analysis of route directions in the city of Venice. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 12.
Donald, M. (1991), Origins of the modern mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Dwyer, F. M. (1978), Strategies for improving visual learning. State College, PA: Learning Services.
Gleitman, L (1999), Personal communication.
Goodman, Nelson, Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols. The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc. 1968, 127–173.
Kieras, D (1992), Diagrammatic display for engineered systems: effects on human performance in interacting with malfunctioning systems.International Journal on Man-Machine Studies, 36, 861–895.
Kirsh, D. (1995), The intelligent use of space. Artificial Intelligence, 73, 31–68.
Larkin, J. H. and Simon, H. A. (1987), Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11, 65–99.
Levie, W. H. and Lentz, R. (1982), Effects of text illustrations: A review of research. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 30, 195–232.
Levin, J. R., Anglin, G. J. & Carney, R. N. (1987), On empirically validating functions of pictures in prose. In D. M. Willows and H. A. Houghton (editors). The psychology of illustration. NY: Pp. 51–85.. Springer-Verlag.
Mayer, R. E. & Gallini, J. K. (1990), When is an illustration worth ten thousand words? Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 715–726.
Norman, D. A. (1993), Things that make us smart. NY: Addison-Wesley.
Scaife, M. and Rogers, Y. (1996), External cognition: How do graphical representations work? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45, 185–213.
Stenning, K. and Oberlander, J. (1995), A cognitive theory of graphical and linguistic reasoning: Logic and implementation. Cognitive Science, 19, 97–140.
Suwa, M. and Tversky, B. (1997), What architects and students perceive in their sketches: A protocol analysis. Design Studies, 18, 385–403.
Tappe, H. & Habel, C. (1998), Verbalization of dynamic sketch maps: Layers of representation and their interaction. Manuscript.
Tversky, B. (1995), Cognitive origins of graphic conventions. In F. T. Marchese (Editor). Understanding images. Pp. 29–53. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Tversky, B. (In press). Spatial schemas in depictions. In M. Gattis (Editors), Spatial schemas and abstract thought. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Tversky, B. and Lee, P. U. (1998), How space structures language. In C. Freksa, C. Habel, and K. F. Wender (Editors), Spatial Cognition: An interdisciplinary approach to representation and processing of spatial knowledge. Pp. 157–175. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Winn, W. (1989), The design and use of instructional graphics. In H. Mandl and J. R. Levin (Editors). Knowledge acquisition from text and pictures. Pp. 125–143. North Holland: Elsevier.
Zacks, J. and Tversky, B. (In press). Bars and lines: A study of graphic communication. Memory and Cognition.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Tversky, B., Lee, P.U. (1999). Pictorial and Verbal Tools for Conveying Routes. In: Freksa, C., Mark, D.M. (eds) Spatial Information Theory. Cognitive and Computational Foundations of Geographic Information Science. COSIT 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1661. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48384-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48384-5_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66365-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48384-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive