Abstract
Integrated project management means that design and construction planning are interleaved with plan execution, allowing both the design and plan to be changed as necessary. This requires that the right effects of change need to be propagated through the plan and design. When this is distributed among designers and planners, no one may have all of the information to perform such propagation and it is important to identify what effects should be propagated to whom, and when. We describe a set of dependencies among plan and design elements that allow such notification by a set of message-passing software agents. The result is to provide a novel level of computer support for complex projects.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Jacome M. F. and S. W. Director, “Design Process Management for CAD Frameworks,” In 29th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference, Washington D.C. IEEE Computer Society Press (1992).
Benda, M., internal survey of Boeing managers, 1998.
Bowen J. and Bahler D., “Task Coordination in Concurrent Engineering”, Enterprise Integration Modeling, C. Petrie, ed., MIT Press, October, 1992.
Conklin, J. and M. Begeman, “gIBIS: A Hypertext Tool for Exploratory Policy Discussion,” Proceedings of CSCW’ 88 (Computer Supported Cooperative Work), September 1988.
Currie, K.W. and Tate, A. (1991) “O-Plan: the Open Planning Architecture”, Artificial Intelligence Vol 52, No. 1, pp. 49–86 Autumn 1991, Elsevier. http://www.aiai.ed.ac.uk/~oplan/oplan/oplan-doc.html
Cutkosky, M., et al., “PACT An Experiment in Integrating Concurrent Engineering Systems,”, IEEE Computer, January, 1993.
Davis, R. and Smith R., “Negotiation as a Metaphor for Distributed Problem Solving,” AI Journal 1983, 20(1): 63–109.
Dellen, B., Maurer, F., and Pews, G., “Knowledge-based techniques to increase the flexibility of workflow management,” Data & Knowledge Engineering, North-Holland, 1997. See also http://wwwagr.informatik.uni-kl.de/~comokit/.
Feldman, Allan M., Welfare Economics and Social Choice Theory, Kluwer, Boston, 1980.
Goldmann, S., “Procura: A Project Management Model of Concurrent Planning and Design,” Proc. WETICE-96, Stanford, CA., June, 1996. See also http://cdr.stanford.edu/ProcessLink/Procura/papers/procura.html.
Haddadi, A., Communication and Cooperation in Agent-Systems: A Pragmatic Theory, Springer Verlag, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, No. 1056, 1996.
Kuokka, D. and L. Harada, “A Communication Infrastructure for Concurrent Engineering,” Journal of Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing (AIEDAM), 9, 1995.
Labrou, Y. and Finin, T., “A Proposal for a new KQML Specification,” U. of Mayland CS and EE Dept. TR CS-97-03, February 1997. Also http://www.cs.umbc.edu/kqml/.
Lander, S., “AI in Design: Issues in Multiagent Design Systems,” IEEE Expert, April, 1997.
Lee, J., and Malone, T., “Partially Shared Views: A scheme for communicating between groups using different type hierarchies,” ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 8(1), 1–26, 1990.
McKinsey Quarterly, No. 1, 1997.
Park, H., “Modeling of Collaborative Design Processes for Agent-Assisted Product Design”, Dissertation, Center for Design Research, Stanford U., January, 1995.
Pea-Mora, F., esign Rationale for Computer Supported Conflict Mitigation during the Design-Construction Process of Large-Scale Civil Engineering Systems, Doctor of Science Thesis, MIT, September 1994.
Petrie, C., “Scheduling with REDUX: A Technology for Replanning,” Proc. Aerospace Applications of AI, October, 1990, Dayton. Also Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corporation TR ACT-RA-340-90, November, 1990.
Petrie, C., “The Redux’ Server,” Proc. Internat. Conf. on Intelligent and Cooperative Information Systems (ICICIS), Rotterdam, May, 1993.
Petrie, C, Webster, T., and Cutkosky, M., “Using Pareto Optimality to Coordinate Distributed Agents” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing (AIEDAM), 9, 269–281, 1995.
Petrie, C., Jeon, H., and Cutkosky, M., “Combining Constraint Propagation and Backtracking for Distributed Engineering,” ECAI-96 Workshop on Non-Standard Constraint Processing, Budapest, August, 1996, revised for AAAI-97 Workshop on Constraints and Agents, Providence, RI, July. 1997. See also http://cdr.stanford.edu/ProcessLink/papers/non-stan-const/non-stanconst.html.
Petrie, C, “Agent-Based Engineering, the Web, and Intelligence,” IEEE Expert, December, 1996. See also http://cdr.stanford.edu/NextLink/Expert.html
Raquet, A., “Dynamic Project Management for distributed Processes.” Diplom Thesis, Kaiserslautern, in progress.
Tate, A., Drabble, B. and Dalton, J. (1996) “The Open Planning Architecture and its Application to Logistics”, in “Advanced Planning Technology” (ed. A. Tate), pp. 257–264, AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA. USA. ftp://ftp.aiai.ed.ac.uk/pub/documents/1996/96-arpi-oplan-and-logistics.ps
Tate, A. (1996) “The <I-N-OVA> Constraint Model of Plans”, Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Planning Systems, (ed. B. Drabble), pp.221–228, Edinburgh, UK, May 1996, AAAI Press. ftp://ftp.aiai.ed.ac.uk/pub/documents/1996/96-aips-inova.ps
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Petrie, C., Goldmann, S., Raquet, A. (1999). Agent-Based Project Management. In: Wooldridge, M.J., Veloso, M. (eds) Artificial Intelligence Today. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1600. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48317-9_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48317-9_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66428-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48317-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive