Abstract
A clarification of the heuristic concept of decoherence requires a consistent description of the classical behavior of some quantum systems. We adopt algebraic quantum mechanics since it includes not only classical physics, but also permits a judicious concept of a classical mixture and explains the possibility of the emergence of a classical behavior of quantum systems. A nonpure quantum state can be interpreted as a classical mixture if and only if its components are disjoint. Here, two pure quantum states are called disjoint if there exists an element of the center of the algebra of observables such that its expectation values with respect to these states are different. An appropriate automorphic dynamics can transform a factor state into a classical mixture of asymptotically disjoint final states. Such asymptotically disjoint quantum states lead to regular decision problems while exactly disjoint states evoke singular problems which engineers reject as improperly posed.
Compare for example BOHR (1949), p.209.
For example, Bohr argued that the description of a meauring instrument cannot be included in the realm of quantum mechanics. Most clearly Bohr stated his view in a letter of October 26, 1935 to Schrödinger: “Das Argument its ja dabei vor allem, dass die Messinstrumente, wenn sie als solche dienen sollen, nicht in den eigentlichen Anwendungsbereich der Quantenmechanik einbezogen werden konnen.” Quoted on p.510 in Kalckar (1996).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bell, J. S. (1975): On wave packet reduction in the Coleman-Hepp model. Helvetica Physica Acta 48, 93–98.
Bhattacharyya, A. (1943): On a measure of divergence between two statistical populations defined by their probability distributions. Bulletin of the Calcutta Mathematical Society 35, 99–109.
Bohr, N. (1949): Discussion with Einstein on epistemological problems in atomic physics. In: P. A. Schilpp (ed.): Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist. Evanston, Illinois: Library of Living Philosophers. Pp.199–241.
Cushen, C. D. & R. L. Hudson (1971): A quantum-mechanical central limit theorem. Journal of Applied Probability 8, 454–469.
Eddington, A. S. (1946): Fundamental Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hahn, H. (1912): Über die Integrate des Herrn Hellinger und die Or-thogonalinvarianten der quandratischen Formen von unendlich vielen Veränderlichen. Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik 23, 161–224.
Hegerfeldt, G. C. & O. Melsheimer (1969): The form of representations of the canonical commutation relations for Base fields and connection with finitely many degrees of freedom. Communications in Mathematical Physics 12, 304–323.
Hellinger, E. (1909): Neue Begründung der Theorie quadratischer Formen von unendlich vielen Veränderlichen. Journal für die reine and angewandte Mathematik 36, 210–271.
Hepp, K. (1972): Quantum theory of measurement and macroscopic ob-servables. Helvetica Physica Acta 45, 237–248.
Hida, T. (1980): Brownian Motion. New York: Springer.
Husimi, K. (1940): Some formal properties of the density matrix. Proceedings of the Physico Mathematical Society of Japan 22, 264–314.
Kakutani, S. (1948): On equivalence of infinite product measures. Annals of Mathematics 49, 214–224.
Kalckar, J. (1996): Niels Bohr. Collected Works. Volume 7. Foundations of Quantum Physics II (1933-1958). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Kraft, C. (1955): Some conditions for consistency and uniform consistency of statistical procedures. In: Neyman, J., LeCam, L. M. & Scheffe, H. (eds.): University of California Publications in Statistics. Volume 2. No.6. pp.125–141.
Landsman, N. P. (1995): Observation and superselection in quantum mechanics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 26, 45–73.
Leggett, A. J., S. Chakravarty, A. T. Dorseyet, M. P. A. Fisher, A. Garg & W. Zwerger (1987): Dynamics of the dissipative two-state system. Reviews of Modern Physics 59, 1–85.
Lighthill, M. J. (1958): Introduction to Fourier Analysis and Generalized Functions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Loomis, L. H. (1952): Note on a theorem by Mackey. Duke Mathematical Journal 19, 641–645.
Mackey, G. W. (1949): A theorem of Stone and von Neumann. Duke Mathematical Journal 16, 313–326.
Mackey, G. W. (1963): The Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. New York: Benjamin.
Mandelbrot, B. (1967): Some noises with 1/f spectrum, a bridge between direct current and white noise. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory IT-13, 289–298.
Mandelbrot, B. B. & J. W. v. Ness (1968): Fractional Brownian motions, fractional noises and applications. SIAM Review 10, 422–437.
Matusita, K. (1951): On the theory of statistical decision functions. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 3, 17–35.
McKenna, J. & R. Klauder (1964): Continuous-representation theory. IV Structure of a class of function spaces arising from quantum mechanics. Journal of Mathematical Physics 5, 878–896.
Mehta, C. L. & E. C. G. Sudarshan (1965): Relation between quantum and semiclassical description of optical coherence. Physical Review 138, B274–B280.
Middleton, D. (1960): Statistical Communication Theory. New York: MacGraw-Hill.
Minlos, R. A. (1959): Genereralized random processes and their extension to a measure. (In Russian). Trudy Moskovskogo Matematiceskogo Obscestva 9, 3127–518. English translation: Selected Translations in Mathematical Statistics and Probability 3, 291-313 (1963).
Neumann, J. v. (1931): Die Eindeutigkeit der Schrödingerschen Opera-toren. Mathematische Annalen 104, 570–578.
Neumann, J. v. (1932): Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik. Berlin: Springer.
Root, W. L. (1963): Singular Gaussian measures in detection theory. In: M. Rosenblatt (ed.): Proceedings of the Symposium on Time Series Analysis. New York: Wiley. Pp.292–315.
Root, W. L. (1964): Stability in signal detection problems. In: R. Bellman (ed.): Stochastic Processes in Mathematical Physics and Engineering. Providence, Rhode Island: American Mathematical Society. Pp.247–263.
Root, W. L. (1968): The detection of signals in Gaussian noise. In: A. V. Balakrishnan (ed.): Communication Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill. Pp.160–191.
Rényi, A. (1966): On the amount of missing information and the Neyman-Pearson lemma. In: F. N. David (ed.): Research Papers in Statistics. Festschrift for J. Neyman. London: Wiley. Pp.281–288.
Rényi, A. (1967): Statistics and information theory. Studia Scientiarum Mathematicarum Hungarica 2, 249–256.
Slepian, D. (1958): Some comments on the detection of Gaussian signals in Gaussian noise. IRE Transactions on Information Theory 4, 56–68.
Stone, M. H. (1930): Linear transformations in Hilbert space. III. Operational methods and group theory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 16, 172–175.
Takesaki, M. (1979): Theory of Operator Algebras I. New York: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Primas, H. (2000). Asymptotically Disjoint Quantum States. In: Blanchard, P., Joos, E., Giulini, D., Kiefer, C., Stamatescu, IO. (eds) Decoherence: Theoretical, Experimental, and Conceptual Problems. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol 538. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46657-6_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46657-6_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66899-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46657-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive